It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Ok so I made a thread a couple weeks about Canon 60D vs. Panasonic GH2, and I did some research and now I think a GH3 is a better choice. So really my question is, is it really worth it to sell the 60D and invest in a nice GH3 setup with maybe a Voigtlander 17.5? Thanks NS
Unless I had a lot of good glass I wouldn't even consider the gh3 over the 2. Question is, do you really need the gh2 over the 60d? this is just gonna turn into another debate about how a new camera doesn't make your videos better(technically it could but you know what I mean)
If you have the money to do so, and are not too invested in canon glass then I would say yes. I just sold my 7D for a GH3 and I already like the GH3 more than the 7D.
The only to answer this question is: is there something about your 60D setup that is holding you back, and does the GH3 + lens combo solve this problem effectively and cost-efficiently?