Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
tomPietrowskiBoth have there place in my opinion. I’ll ski an overlap boot for nearly everything but for park you just can’t beat that linear 3 piece flex in my opinion.
deadhead420Enlighten me, genuinely curious why people like the linear flex of 3 piece for park? for landings? for the pop? what is it?
I've skied dabellos and a lilttle FT and I could never go back. when I skied the dabello 3 peice "130" I hated the feeling of being able to bottom out my boot on landings. I feel like I would bottom out my achilles before the boot, that was a gross feeling. I want my boot to catch me from too much dorsiflexion. and they just were a little sloppy all around even while having a tight shell fit
Maybe if there is a 95mm last 150 flex K2/FT/Dabello I would try again lmao
eheathDo you have no leg muscles? Boots aren't supposed to absorb all of your landing lol I think you're misunderstanding what flex is for...
deadhead420Bruh. Obviously not on average landings, but when I fuck up and land too far forward especially freeriding I want my boot to stay composed for the next turn and not over flex and bottom out. Landing on my shins will always beat landing on my heels
or what about this video
https://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/1105608/--YouTubeif Thall was wearing stiffer boots in this clip he probably wouldn’t have snapped his Achilles. He more or less claims that in his interview
deadhead420Enlighten me, genuinely curious why people like the linear flex of 3 piece for park? for landings? for the pop? what is it?
I've skied dabellos and a lilttle FT and I could never go back. when I skied the dabello 3 peice "130" I hated the feeling of being able to bottom out my boot on landings. I feel like I would bottom out my achilles before the boot, that was a gross feeling. I want my boot to catch me from too much dorsiflexion. and they just were a little sloppy all around even while having a tight shell fit
Maybe if there is a 95mm last 150 flex K2/FT/Dabello I would try again lmao
deadhead420Enlighten me, genuinely curious why people like the linear flex of 3 piece for park? for landings? for the pop? what is it?
I've skied dabellos and a lilttle FT and I could never go back. when I skied the dabello 3 peice "130" I hated the feeling of being able to bottom out my boot on landings. I feel like I would bottom out my achilles before the boot, that was a gross feeling. I want my boot to catch me from too much dorsiflexion. and they just were a little sloppy all around even while having a tight shell fit
Maybe if there is a 95mm last 150 flex K2/FT/Dabello I would try again lmao
tomPietrowskiSo what our athletes mainly say is it’s the consistent flex which makes sense. 3piece boots have a much more linear flex than an overlap boot. What that means is that the stiffness when the cuff begins to move will be basically the same as at the end of the flex. An overlap boot in comparison will start soft but then really stiffen up as you go further into the flex.
For the park (and I generally exclude pipe in this) having that consistent flex allows our athletes to use there legs much more in landings and have more control on where they are balancing their weight in the landing. For example if you know a boot is the same flex all the way through you can anticipate how much you need to flex your knees and ankles into a landing and where to put your weight to balance. In an overlap boot with the flex stiffening suddenly it can throw them off as they can not get as deep into the flex as they expect and they can be thrown off balance. For the most part the very best are not using the flex of the boot to support them on landings as much as using it to help control the landing.
I probably explained that badly but basically a linear flex is preferred over a progressive flex by most of our athletes.
But this is generally not the case out of the park. For everything else the dampness and stiffening is really preferred. That is why we continue to offer both options as there really is no right or wrong but just different styles which certain people prefer.
deadhead420Is the flex of 3 peice boots less thermo-reactive than an overlap boot? Is that a part of the consistency that your athletes report? Like WorldCup ski racers will use different boots for different air temperatures. I could imagine for World Cup slopestyle that boot consistency between 0°F Colorado type shit and a 40°F big air setup in a city would be major
tomPietrowskiWell temp stability could be easily resolved by changing the tongue out, which is another big benefit of a 3 piece boot, but no most our guys don’t mess with the flex of the boot and will stick to one flex for everything. We use pebax for the tongue which is much more temp stable than pu so the boots don’t suffer from temp changes all that much anyway.
deadhead420I know pebax is becoming more common in backcountry stuff but has it ever been used a low volume and stiff overlap boot? The lack of temp stablity in my PU race boots is the only thing I don't like about them
deadhead420That's cool I didn't know pebax was used in the k2 tounges
I know pebax is becoming more common in backcountry stuff but has it ever been used a low volume and stiff overlap boot? The lack of temp stablity in my PU race boots is the only thing I don't like about them