NSCrip69If the plastic is so much less durable as you claim, why do you think harlaut and other skiers who use plastic bindings, trust it enough to crash or land on 50 foot big air jumps without any issue with the binding breaking?
if these guys can trust it at that level of skiing I’m pretty sure the average joe doing black diamonds and regular park features will be fine.
Pro skiers at the level of HH are the last people to look to for durability tbh. They have a line of fresh skis/bindings when things go wrong. You see bindings break fairly consistently at that level if you watch comps, and guess what, they are on a fresh pair of sticks next run. Not to mention they aren't using the same pair of bindings year after year. They are set into the next colorway so they really aren't putting that many days onto their gear.
I also think you are severely underestimating how many bindings break even just at your local ripper level.
There is a reason that full metal bindings like sth steels/16/18 and pivot 15/18s are sought out so much by actual people trying to get years and years of 100 day seasons out of their gear. They last forever. Plastic degrades over time due to stress, cold, UV etc. It is just a factor to take in on the material and it's not dogging the gear. And like you said, the average joe skiing 12 days a year is never going to notice a difference.
That doesn't mean that bindings like the pivot 14 are bad in any way, shape, or form. But it is why they are cheaper, and why you don't see many rippers skiing around on fully functional 15 year old attacks or griffons. IMO If you can get them for a prodeal, I would always argue to go for the longer lasting equipment. If you are paying full price, then i can understand the thought of "hey i can get 2 sets of attack 13s for the same price as pivot 15s".