Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
weatcoastDam it only took on3p 20 years to realize that heavily rockered skis suck for anything but those 5 days of powder we all get per season.
muffMan.Saw some videos, but no reviews. Honestly so hyped for it.
I probably will keep the normal shape, but interested in a woodsman ripper as a freeride chargy ski. Cool they are adding new shapes and experimenting
KyguyyReal question: I wanna size up to 181 jeff 92, but after seeing more edge contact, should I stay with 176?
skiP.E.I.It's awesome that they are so established that kids think they've been around for 20 years.
KalmarJalmarJeffrey 108 with the ripper could be my cup of tea, I enjoy carving so camber is always welcome in my skis. With the price tag I will rather stay with my wooden skis though.
KimJongTrillI have a custom ripper 108 inbound. Will report back.
KimJongTrillI have a custom ripper 108 inbound. Will report back.
weatcoastGood job wasting money on a normal camber ski that you could have bought for 1/3 the price from any other manufacturer
weatcoastGood job wasting money on a normal camber ski that you could have bought for 1/3 the price from any other manufacturer
tyauerUnbelievably tragic that the wrenegade got taken away before ripper rocker. Ripper rocker wren ti’s would’ve had me straight lining Headwall real nice
mattytruWhile it's undoubtably humorous that they have just added a standard camber profile option to their skis, it's still a good call. Camber is usually a good thing for anyone who doesn't ski fresh snow 100% of the time.
Once the new profile has been around for a little while I'll be excited to come across a used pair and try em out. I know they will ski like most other mid fat lightly rockered freestyle skis but their construction is solid and I wouldn't mind continuing to support them.
Voyage86I don’t think you are supporting them if you buy second hand used..
mattytruhah, valid point.
i've been pretty vocal to anyone i ski with about my positive experience on on3ps though and have definitely influenced others to buy so i think it still helps them.
i never buy skis new because i'm not loaded. does support come purely from buying gear new from a company? does positive word of mouth influence count? seems to imply you have to be rich to matter.
weatcoastIf you think people need to be rich to afford $500 skis you’re either retarded or 14 years old. Probably both.
**This post was edited on Jul 11th 2024 at 8:08:10pm
Voyage86I don’t think you are supporting them if you buy second hand used..
KimJongTrillFor science. 100 ripper vs regular 110.
VzxHas anyone tried them on snow yet? if so how were there.
weatcoastWe’re in the middle of summer, sport.
KimJongTrillCustom sale my guy.
KimJongTrillCustom sale my guy.
weatcoastWe’re in the middle of summer, sport.
zack1416Hey, I am probably one of few people who has skied the new rocker, on a pair of Jeffrey 100s. I don’t have a much experience on ON3P skis meaning can’t compare them to their previous rocker.
This was on thin early season conditions, a mix of groomers and crud, but not icy.
Honestly they were among the funnest skis I’ve ever been on. Great edge control and very poppy, and among the most responsive skis I’ve ever strapped to my feet. I felt a lot of confidence whether carving on groomers, charging in the crud, or just doing small jibs.
I’m about to put an order in as I tested a few different skis last year and these were by far my favorite.
NSCrip69ON3P marketing department strikes again