SPLIFF | A Video by Dylan Siggers and Liam Morgan

Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

1000 Skis

profile picture
Steezy.Stephen
Posts: 28 - Karma: 58
Does anybody actually wear these? I think it's because of the all red where there is no topsheet. But I just don't understand how they have all this money to have such a huge team when i've seen nobody ride them.
Jan 23 2024 3:03PM
6 1
profile picture
KungKalmar
Posts: 1596 - Karma: 13,279
Nobody buys 1000skis because they are so expensive. Team is so huge because they have like 3 athletes and the rest of the team are owners of 1000skis.
Jan 23 2024 3:09PM
18 0
profile picture
Rock_Inhabitant
Posts: 1070 - Karma: 11,105
1000 skis are as durable as a dry spaghetti noodle
Jan 23 2024 3:14PM
9 1
profile picture
Steezy.Stephen
Posts: 28 - Karma: 58
Rock_Inhabitant1000 skis are as durable as a dry spaghetti noodle


Yeah. You would expect them to be somewhat durable because didn't the guy that made them leave and try and copy ON3P.
Jan 23 2024 3:23PM
1 9
profile picture
Christian_Bale
Posts: 1883 - Karma: 21,186
Steezy.StephenYeah. You would expect them to be somewhat durable because didn't the guy that made them leave and try and copy ON3P.

"the guy that made them" lmao its multiple people and you should definitely know their names, especially if you're thinking of Magnus. And they don't seem similar to on3ps so I'm calling bs on the claim that they're copying on3p
Jan 23 2024 3:36PM
13 2
profile picture
Steezy.Stephen
Posts: 28 - Karma: 58
Christian_Bale"the guy that made them" lmao its multiple people and you should definitely know their names, especially if you're thinking of Magnus. And they don't seem similar to on3ps so I'm calling bs on the claim that they're copying on3p


I meant to say guys, but hackel and magnus made good skis with on3p so I would assume that they would know something with durability.
Jan 23 2024 3:43PM
0 8
profile picture
Christian_Bale
Posts: 1883 - Karma: 21,186
JalmarKalmarNobody buys 1000skis because they are so expensive. Team is so huge because they have like 3 athletes and the rest of the team are owners of 1000skis.

It seems like they a good missed opportunity, unless I'm missing something. I imagine they would sell so many more skis if
(a) they didn't make a hard pivot away from street, and park to an extent, considering how many of their followers/potential clientele ride park/street
(b) the skis were more affordable, or they at least offered a more affordable park ski
(c) they didn't go overboard with reels, trending audio, engagement bait, etc

At the end of the day, I want to buy skis from a company that puts out team street videos, supports street skiers, doesn't make unaffordable skis, and doesn't have a cringe instagram. (technically speaking there's only 2 companies I can think of that meet this criteria lol). Don't want to sound overly critical, I do wish them all the best with their company.
Jan 23 2024 3:44PM
10 1
profile picture
Christian_Bale
Posts: 1883 - Karma: 21,186
Steezy.StephenI meant to say guys, but hackel and magnus made good skis with on3p so I would assume that they would know something with durability.

yeah for sure, I imagine they definitely learned a lot and applied some of it to the way they make their skis but I think it's a bit of a reach to say they copied on3p. Plenty of valid criticism for 1000skis apart from this
Jan 23 2024 3:46PM
1 0
profile picture
sampli
Posts: 84 - Karma: 669
Rock_Inhabitant1000 skis are as durable as a dry spaghetti noodle

At least they look pretty cool
Jan 23 2024 3:47PM
1 3
profile picture
ChaseingSkiing
Posts: 14 - Karma: 157
Christian_BaleIt seems like they a good missed opportunity, unless I'm missing something. I imagine they would sell so many more skis if
(a) they didn't make a hard pivot away from street, and park to an extent, considering how many of their followers/potential clientele ride park/street
(b) the skis were more affordable, or they at least offered a more affordable park ski
(c) they didn't go overboard with reels, trending audio, engagement bait, etc

At the end of the day, I want to buy skis from a company that puts out team street videos, supports street skiers, doesn't make unaffordable skis, and doesn't have a cringe instagram. (technically speaking there's only 2 companies I can think of that meet this criteria lol). Don't want to sound overly critical, I do wish them all the best with their company.


What 2 companies are you thinking of?
Jan 23 2024 4:24PM
1 0
profile picture
deac
Posts: 774 - Karma: 3,271
its mostly just shitty tik toks kids on em with their strive 13s thinking they the shit
Jan 23 2024 4:30PM
2 1
profile picture
SlushSeason
Posts: 850 - Karma: 6,593
Yeah, even on3p doesn't really make affordable skis (though i still buy them)
ChaseingSkiingWhat 2 companies are you thinking of?
Jan 23 2024 4:33PM
5 1
profile picture
Christian_Bale
Posts: 1883 - Karma: 21,186
ChaseingSkiingWhat 2 companies are you thinking of?

I thought about and there's maybe 4. This probably falls into the unpopular ski opinion category and is just a personal opinion, but Vishnu and jetskis for sure, and also armada and line. Armada doesn't make team street videos (they do support some of the best street skiers obviously.) Line does sponsor a lot of cringe influencers unfortunately but otherwise solid company imo. on3p: too expensive. Surface: too social media focused with their daily posts, but good team videos. k2, salomon, and black crows could be focusing a lot more on team videos.
Jan 23 2024 6:37PM
2 3
profile picture
Celery
Posts: 2002 - Karma: 24,588
1000s are far more similar in design to something like a blend then they are to a magnus
Steezy.StephenYeah. You would expect them to be somewhat durable because didn't the guy that made them leave and try and copy ON3P.
Jan 23 2024 8:59PM
4 0
profile picture
Headache
Posts: 104 - Karma: 1,140
Christian_BaleIt seems like they a good missed opportunity, unless I'm missing something. I imagine they would sell so many more skis if
(a) they didn't make a hard pivot away from street, and park to an extent, considering how many of their followers/potential clientele ride park/street
(b) the skis were more affordable, or they at least offered a more affordable park ski
(c) they didn't go overboard with reels, trending audio, engagement bait, etc

At the end of the day, I want to buy skis from a company that puts out team street videos, supports street skiers, doesn't make unaffordable skis, and doesn't have a cringe instagram. (technically speaking there's only 2 companies I can think of that meet this criteria lol). Don't want to sound overly critical, I do wish them all the best with their company.

I will add they set out with the intention of building a sustainable ski, to built it up to their standards means the ski costs $1000.
Having the ski cost this much means they need to market towards people who can afford a $1000 ski. Generally speaking the people who care about core street parts and cheap park skis are not going to be able to afford it anyway, so may as well create "trendy resort content" to appeal to the people who can afford their skis.
Jan 24 2024 4:15PM
0 0
profile picture
hi_vis360
Posts: 4983 - Karma: 50,382
Steezy.StephenI meant to say guys, but hackel and magnus made good skis with on3p so I would assume that they would know something with durability.


Hackel and magnus do not make skis. They are skiers. On3p makes all of their own skis. 1000 gets their skis built in a factory in Sweden that also makes RMU.
Jan 26 2024 4:50PM
0 0
profile picture
BallClapper
Posts: 2547 - Karma: 10,068
No
Jan 29 2024 12:33PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)