kobajaki.mazuWell, snow ≠ glacier ice. The ice on a glacier takes a long time to form (depending on the circumstances like temperatures and dynamics of the glacier). Snow can be penetrated way better by liquid precipitation than ice. Furthermore, taking ice out of a glacier always destabilize the glacier itself. If you have a small glacier and take out the ice and spread it, you enlarge its surface so it melts faster (same as snow piles in winter, they melt slower in the sun).
Another point is, that glaciers kind of "hold up" loose material on the sidewalls of its bed. So if the glacier is gone, rockfalls are way more likely. So yes, I'd say, digging up glaciers is indeed a problem. You're taking away material that took decades to form and grind it up and spread it out so that the sun just melts it away.
**This post was edited on Oct 27th 2023 at 3:30:30am
Furthermore, accumulation does not take place since quite some time in Europe (the mass balance of the glaciers is negative and a excavation increases the loss). Note that for an increase of the glaciers mass balance you need to have a snow cover of 70% of the glaciers surface (+ the water equivalent of the snow cover has to be bigger than the water equivalent the glacier has lost in the year before) at the end of the glaciological year (end of August, but i can't remember exactly). And that is not happening at all. Plus, the excavated area can accumulate liquid precipitation (that was happening quite often this year, because the snow line was pretty high), which can start to melt the glaciers ice.
"Moving snow around" is a problem, because technically snow is not a glacier. The definition of a glacier includes that it has to be a dynamic system (
A glacier that has ceased to flow is termed stagnant or dead. https://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Glacier).
(I had to do a second post, idk why I couldn't edit the one above)