Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
elm.i think pivots > attacks > sth > jesters
KilaTsunamiPivots have that smaller mounting point so you get better flex out of the ski compared to the jesters, other than that they pm do the same thing with different characteristics
cb.waveyThoughts?
cb.waveyoh damn that low on the list?
.MortonIn my experience working at a ski shop doing binding calibrations, pivots test accurately for longer than jesters. I think marker uses less grease in their bindings or something but after a few years the dins often test higher than they’re supposed to
cb.waveyoh trueeeeeeeeee
maaatttRealistically the effect of pivots on flex versus bindings on a track is really really small. The track doesn't extend all the far from your boot
jompcockI'd say small but noticeable. Jesters also have a higher stack height putting you higher off the ski, making the ski feel slightly more "dead". I can't explain it but I feel like I can feel the ski better on a lower binding with a shorter platform. Not a huge deal and I have a pair of skis with markers but it's there.
Used both for years and found that pivots will last longer if taken care of. Pivot brakes are a pain in the ass to fix/replace if you find yourself ejecting a lot switch. Jesters shred the base plates making them wobble which can be a pain and they're known to eventually crack.
maaatttIn regards to cracking marker baseplates I have definitely pulled off more broken pivot half moon plates than griffin/jester/squire tracks
jompcockIdk if they addressed that or something but I haven't broken a half moon since my fks 14's I got in like 2012. Also haven't bought jesters since like 2015 so no idea if they've gotten better base plates. I have a pair of Griffons on a pair of BDogs but I kinda gave them to my dad so no comment on those.