Member of the Month

partyandBS
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

115mm in park

profile picture
belti02
Posts: 89 - Karma: 635
What’s your opinion on whats to wide i ski mostly bc but also some park. Would you say that you can use 115mm underfoot in park?
Oct 17 2023 3:47AM
14 0
profile picture
fabbe
Posts: 844 - Karma: -85
i dont really know.
Oct 17 2023 4:11AM
35 1
profile picture
teabag
Posts: 691 - Karma: 4,972
The widest skis I’ve ridden in park were 102mm underboot so I’m not talking from experience but I’d imagine they’d feel a bit clumsy. Probably not the best for techy rail tricks and bigger spins.
Oct 17 2023 5:26AM
10 0
profile picture
jumpman101
Posts: 169 - Karma: 1,071
I skied the jj as a daily park ski for a year and went back to a jeffrey 102. It was super clumsy and slow. If you are just doing a lap here and there it won't be bad but if it is every lap look for something narrower.
Oct 17 2023 5:49AM
14 0
profile picture
Twig
Posts: 6422 - Karma: 60,351
Yes
https://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/1065046/DEAD-INCELS---JAKE-CARNEY---NS-ORIGINALS-1-1
Oct 17 2023 6:14AM
27 0
profile picture
teabag
Posts: 691 - Karma: 4,972
TwigYes
https://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/1065046/DEAD-INCELS---JAKE-CARNEY---NS-ORIGINALS-1-1


Still though, not a single swap or a spin bigger than 540 was executed. Maybe the properties of the ski had something to do with it? Looks fun for just cruising like that tho.
Oct 17 2023 6:50AM
6 31
profile picture
HuumeHippi
Posts: 200 - Karma: 717
I've done a few days in park with 120 bents, cryising is fun but cant do many tricks on them. One foot slides are easier though.
Oct 17 2023 7:06AM
3 0
profile picture
Dlonetti
Posts: 1862 - Karma: 19,473
I rode 106s for 2 seasons and enjoyed it. But I probably wouldnt go more than 110
Oct 17 2023 9:45AM
7 0
profile picture
tdollo
Posts: 3801 - Karma: 18,825
Whitewalkers are insane in the park, but those thin edges and caruba core means your time is limited until they clap
Oct 17 2023 9:57AM
18 0
profile picture
snowfinder
Posts: 2885 - Karma: 34,223
teabagStill though, not a single swap or a spin bigger than 540 was executed. Maybe the properties of the ski had something to do with it?


No.
Oct 17 2023 10:08AM
12 1
profile picture
maaattt
Posts: 2560 - Karma: 31,077
Homie in highschool exclusive skied surface one lifes
Oct 17 2023 10:19AM
7 0
profile picture
skiP.E.I.
Posts: 7846 - Karma: 22,202
I don't like using wide skis when skiing only park but they're fine, you just can't be quite as quick. Just try it and see if it works for you.
Oct 17 2023 10:33AM
4 0
profile picture
Raf.Diaz.
Posts: 687 - Karma: 10,143
Id say find some hellbent
Oct 17 2023 11:01AM
18 0
profile picture
Zurg
Posts: 1518 - Karma: 5,105
I spent 10ish days in the park on some 186 on3p jeffery 108s and everything the felt cumbersome. Pretty much double the effort on every trick. On rails you dont get much feel, and it felt like you were just on for the ride.

On the flip I was on some 186 j vacations (104) and riding the park was a blast. 🧐
Oct 17 2023 12:42PM
7 2
profile picture
migidimigi
Posts: 441 - Karma: 3,188
I ski Bentchetlers in park especially when it is warm and super slushy. They are light as fuck so they are pretty agile and easy to ski, would not do that on heavier skis.
Oct 17 2023 12:56PM
2 0
profile picture
X_MEMESWERVE_XX
Posts: 3654 - Karma: 29,852
I rode 120’s for a season in park, it’s possible but not as fun. If ur doing mostly bc stuff they’ll be good for park here and there, but if you wanna dedicate more to park I wouldn’t go over 110
Oct 17 2023 4:06PM
3 0
profile picture
belti02
Posts: 89 - Karma: 635
teabagStill though, not a single swap or a spin bigger than 540 was executed. Maybe the properties of the ski had something to do with it? Looks fun for just cruising like that tho.


Verry nice😍
Oct 17 2023 4:43PM
1 0
profile picture
Farmville420
Posts: 4814 - Karma: 61,875
teabagStill though, not a single swap or a spin bigger than 540 was executed. Maybe the properties of the ski had something to do with it? Looks fun for just cruising like that tho.

https://youtu.be/H4bdeL1fTpk?si=dlD87E3h7VCkWXNU skip to 7:30

OP I have taken my reckoned 112s in the park and they were very fun, maybe harder to stuff but surprisingly not as difficult as you would think
Oct 17 2023 6:10PM
2 0
profile picture
fdWEARer
Posts: 277 - Karma: 309
belti02What’s your opinion on whats to wide i ski mostly bc but also some park. Would you say that you can use 115mm underfoot in park?


I could ski 106 wide in the park fine, and i love techy rail tricks like quad pretz swap pretz 2, and also 2 on superfeds
you just gotta get used to what you are gonna ski, sure it might be easier on a smaller ski, but that doesnt mean its impossible on a bigger ski
Oct 17 2023 7:34PM
2 1
profile picture
Lemuel
Posts: 14504 - Karma: 10,751
It’ll depend on the ski. But most skis in the 115+ club are going to have less side cut which will add the the clumsy feel.


I’ve spent some days on my Majesty Lumberjacks in the park (120mm) and they are a ton of fun. If you like skiing / hitting trails fast, boostin, and generally not doing much spinning a fatty’ll get the job done
Oct 17 2023 7:51PM
3 0
profile picture
Lonely
Posts: 6776 - Karma: 62,367
I learned how to hit rails on hellbents
Oct 17 2023 7:54PM
8 0
profile picture
asparagus
Posts: 2489 - Karma: 28,373
Farmville420https://youtu.be/H4bdeL1fTpk?si=dlD87E3h7VCkWXNU skip to 7:30

OP I have taken my reckoned 112s in the park and they were very fun, maybe harder to stuff but surprisingly not as difficult as you would think

Whaaaaat?? Had no idea slim to none dropped for free, thanks
Oct 17 2023 11:12PM
7 0
profile picture
CatdickBojangles
Posts: 6203 - Karma: 62,983
LonelyI learned how to hit rails on hellbents

That’s called leg day
Oct 18 2023 10:12AM
3 0
profile picture
switchlip2
Posts: 2142 - Karma: 25,112
MisfitmonkeyI could ski 106 wide in the park fine, and i love techy rail tricks like quad pretz swap pretz 2, and also 2 on superfeds
you just gotta get used to what you are gonna ski, sure it might be easier on a smaller ski, but that doesnt mean its impossible on a bigger ski


Quad pretz swap pretz 2
Oct 18 2023 11:17AM
5 0
profile picture
GKS
Posts: 372 - Karma: 2,940
teabagStill though, not a single swap or a spin bigger than 540 was executed. Maybe the properties of the ski had something to do with it? Looks fun for just cruising like that tho.


bro has never seen a jake carney edit before
Oct 18 2023 1:18PM
9 0
profile picture
teabag
Posts: 691 - Karma: 4,972
GKSbro has never seen a jake carney edit before


I get that it sounds like I think he can’t do more with those skis but I was just throwing it out there to provoke conversation
Oct 18 2023 1:28PM
2 0
profile picture
Slowbro
Posts: 3927 - Karma: 21,931
I ski my Pettitors (122 underfoot) in the park now and then. Rails are tough, I can't manage much more than a surface swap to two out on them, and sliding feels harder to control. Jumps are also an experience... You can really feel the tips flopping around on landings and you need to land bolts to not wash out.

It's fun to do now and then for a change but IMO the max width for a dedicated park ski should be 105mm. Line Elizabeths are the fattest park ski ever I think, at 115mm, but they were also intended to be skied in a shorter length and didn't have any rocker.
Oct 18 2023 1:48PM
1 0
profile picture
nCrow
Posts: 1228 - Karma: 8,204
If you're a good enough skier the limit does not exist
Oct 18 2023 3:17PM
3 1
profile picture
bradwalters
Posts: 386 - Karma: 3,095
I ski the Reckoner 112 as my park ski. Super fun. Kinda slows my old ass down from trying to spin too much. Great when it gets slushy also.
Oct 18 2023 7:01PM
2 0
profile picture
partyandBS
Posts: 4848 - Karma: 74,740
i got some ON3Ps on an impulse buy that are 110 underfoot. my concern is that the wider ski means additional pressure on the edge when setting this deteriorating the edge faster than a skinnier ski. im a big dude at 180lbs and 6’ 3.5” (the .5 is a running joke but also spot on lol) so i feel like 110 is more appropriate for me than some of the short kings out there. so imma run it.

its a lot more ski than my current set up which is good. my factions were warrentied and they sent me ct 2.0 183s instead of 188s and since they were free after beating the shit out of my other pair i wasnt complaining. but ON3P 186 is taller than my armada and fatypus skis that are both labeled 188s which is dope. getting side tracked here but i was on the NS x J Skis whipits 10 years ago when j skis was born and they were 178 and 90 underfoot. i was basically snow blading lol
Nov 19 2023 4:39PM
1 1
profile picture
Dlonetti
Posts: 1862 - Karma: 19,473
Candide ripping on his new 111s on insta recently
Nov 19 2023 7:41PM
9 0
profile picture
elm.
Posts: 1510 - Karma: 13,594
I had some revision subtractions that were pretty baller for the park. Everything else has been pretty meh
Nov 19 2023 9:47PM
1 0
profile picture
Clark456
Posts: 53 - Karma: 343
Landing a jump in hellbents is such a great noise
Raf.Diaz.Id say find some hellbent
Nov 19 2023 9:51PM
0 0
profile picture
steez_apprentice
Posts: 891 - Karma: 6,161
https://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/1063180/ALL-8-On-Hellbents
here's your answer

**This post was edited on Nov 19th 2023 at 10:23:14pm
Nov 19 2023 10:22PM
8 0
profile picture
lil.Boye
Posts: 2715 - Karma: 12,408
steez_apprenticehttps://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/1063180/ALL-8-On-Hellbents
here's your answer

**This post was edited on Nov 19th 2023 at 10:23:14pm


This was g as hell
Nov 20 2023 6:32AM
7 0
profile picture
floras
Posts: 8 - Karma: 12
the metal under your foot on an sf110 is for better rail feel
Nov 20 2023 12:12PM
0 0
profile picture
sonofson
Posts: 12 - Karma: 75
Of course you can. Maybe not optimal though.

I skied Sakanas for the past two years. Granted, they are 105 underfoot but wide as hell everywhere else. Least clumsy ski I've ever ridden so far
Nov 21 2023 11:29PM
4 1
profile picture
Loodwik
Posts: 237 - Karma: 315
Used to have the old shreditor 112 for park and everything else. Great in slush but sore knees a lot of the time.
Nov 23 2023 9:19AM
1 0
profile picture
Vzx
Posts: 468 - Karma: 2,022
belti02What’s your opinion on whats to wide i ski mostly bc but also some park. Would you say that you can use 115mm underfoot in park?


It doable but having anything more than a 110mm will most likely make it harder to spin and its just more clunky and less fun.
Nov 28 2023 10:00PM
1 0
profile picture
realSlimshadyfr
Posts: 57 - Karma: -159
I used to ride 106 in the park before they broke. They feel real nice to slide on and stable, but doing any tricks on rails is a lot harder. Like a lot. I would imagine, that 115mm would be very hard to do any tech in like swaps or spins out. But for kickers and just pure slides, its a lot of fun.
Nov 29 2023 4:09AM
2 0
profile picture
realSlimshadyfr
Posts: 57 - Karma: -159
I used to ride 106 in the park before they broke. They feel real nice to slide on and stable, but doing any tricks on rails is a lot harder. Like a lot. I would imagine, that 115mm would be very hard to do any tech in like swaps or spins out. But for kickers and just pure slides, its a lot of fun.
Nov 29 2023 4:09AM
0 4
profile picture
realSlimshadyfr
Posts: 57 - Karma: -159
I used to ride 106 in the park before they broke. They feel real nice to slide on and stable, but doing any tricks on rails is a lot harder. Like a lot. I would imagine, that 115mm would be very hard to do any tech in like swaps or spins out. But for kickers and just pure slides, its a lot of fun.
Nov 29 2023 4:09AM
1 3
profile picture
realSlimshadyfr
Posts: 57 - Karma: -159
I used to ride 106 in the park before they broke. They feel real nice to slide on and stable, but doing any tricks on rails is a lot harder. Like a lot. I would imagine, that 115mm would be very hard to do any tech in like swaps or spins out. But for kickers and just pure slides, its a lot of fun.
Nov 29 2023 4:09AM
0 4
profile picture
realSlimshadyfr
Posts: 57 - Karma: -159
I used to ride 106 in the park before they broke. They feel real nice to slide on and stable, but doing any tricks on rails is a lot harder. Like a lot. I would imagine, that 115mm would be very hard to do any tech in like swaps or spins out. But for kickers and just pure slides, its a lot of fun.
Nov 29 2023 4:09AM
0 4
profile picture
realSlimshadyfr
Posts: 57 - Karma: -159
I used to ride 106 in the park before they broke. They feel real nice to slide on and stable, but doing any tricks on rails is a lot harder. Like a lot. I would imagine, that 115mm would be very hard to do any tech in like swaps or spins out. But for kickers and just pure slides, its a lot of fun.
Nov 29 2023 4:09AM
1 3
profile picture
realSlimshadyfr
Posts: 57 - Karma: -159
I used to ride 106 in the park before they broke. They feel real nice to slide on and stable, but doing any tricks on rails is a lot harder. Like a lot. I would imagine, that 115mm would be very hard to do any tech in like swaps or spins out. But for kickers and just pure slides, its a lot of fun.
Nov 29 2023 4:09AM
1 3
profile picture
realSlimshadyfr
Posts: 57 - Karma: -159
I used to ride 106 in the park before they broke. They feel real nice to slide on and stable, but doing any tricks on rails is a lot harder. Like a lot. I would imagine, that 115mm would be very hard to do any tech in like swaps or spins out. But for kickers and just pure slides, its a lot of fun.
Nov 29 2023 4:09AM
0 4
profile picture
realSlimshadyfr
Posts: 57 - Karma: -159
I used to ride 106 in the park before they broke. They feel real nice to slide on and stable, but doing any tricks on rails is a lot harder. Like a lot. I would imagine, that 115mm would be very hard to do any tech in like swaps or spins out. But for kickers and just pure slides, its a lot of fun.
Nov 29 2023 4:09AM
0 4
profile picture
realSlimshadyfr
Posts: 57 - Karma: -159
I used to ride 106 in the park before they broke. They feel real nice to slide on and stable, but doing any tricks on rails is a lot harder. Like a lot. I would imagine, that 115mm would be very hard to do any tech in like swaps or spins out. But for kickers and just pure slides, its a lot of fun.
Nov 29 2023 4:09AM
0 4
profile picture
realSlimshadyfr
Posts: 57 - Karma: -159
I used to ride 106 in the park before they broke. They feel real nice to slide on and stable, but doing any tricks on rails is a lot harder. Like a lot. I would imagine, that 115mm would be very hard to do any tech in like swaps or spins out. But for kickers and just pure slides, its a lot of fun.
Nov 29 2023 4:09AM
1 3
profile picture
realSlimshadyfr
Posts: 57 - Karma: -159
I used to ride 106 in the park before they broke. They feel real nice to slide on and stable, but doing any tricks on rails is a lot harder. Like a lot. I would imagine, that 115mm would be very hard to do any tech in like swaps or spins out. But for kickers and just pure slides, its a lot of fun.
Nov 29 2023 4:09AM
1 4
All times are Eastern (-5)