Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
CeleryIf the Jeffery 102 was too much ski for you to have fun with the poacher may not be that exciting to you.
isaacwrongWhat's op weight/skier type/average number of days? 178 at 1650 is not going to hold up compared to the poachers theoretically. IMO most of the companies that are using "updated durability" as marketing are stretchin for sure. Edollos seem much more durable and are pretty similar underfoot.
SchizoSkierI’ve had poachers in the past and loved em. I just don’t ski enough outside of the park to justify having Jeffrey’s. I also thought they were super fun especially on butters, just am not a fan of how much rocker On3p skis have
175 lbs, type 3, 70+ days, West coast. My last skis were edollos and I loved how they skied but the sidewalls are make poorly for the 2023 model at least. Ik every other dollo they’ve made didn’t have sidewall problems so maybe the 2024 isn’t using that plastic sidewall?
polmeiwest coast skier who doesn't ski outside of the park. agh. i dislike these kinda people.
Also, jus ride all-mountain fun jibby skis that are 100-108 underfoot in the park, it's the way to go.
Also, ski less park and enjoy the entire mountain, it's not like you're in the Midwest
SchizoSkierI mainly ski park and the new ARV 94 looks sick but unfortunately I have some doubts on the durability due to their insanely light weight. Has anyone here tried them yet and able to tell me if their worth the price? Poachers are only 320$ rn so I’m thinking of just copping some ol’ reliables for next season.