Reddit challenge

combatgoon17i challenge you to not go on reddit the next 90 days

combatgoon17i challenge you to not go on reddit the next 90 days

K-Dot.Redditors aren’t soyboys, they’re bacon boys. Calling someone a soyboy while being in unhealthy shape from consuming excessive amounts of carcinogenic animal products and sugar is incredibly reddit behavior though.

One of the most striking things about r/skiing is how ahistorical it is. Other subreddits have some notion of lore and legend while that sub often treats freeskiing like it was invented in 2017 by andri ragetli. It’s honestly puzzling how incurious the sub seems about the vast history of skiing. Is there an actual good skiing sub somewhere on Reddit? And while on the topic, are there any good skiing tiktok pages? Not looking to watch Hackel repost realski clips set to viral tiktok dance songs

BradFiAusNzCoCaI once got into an argument on r/skiing about Attack toe height and monitoring it for movement. They told me I was wrong and said they were ski patrol at Loveland. I then explained in detail why they were wrong and that I, also, ski Loveland and that I can remember no patrollers with 1st gen attacks.

They admitted they were weekend volunteer patrol and didn’t know that much about ski gear. That, to me, is r/skiing in a nutshell.

TOAST.you know every patrollers bindings? That's weird man.

BradFiAusNzCoCaI didn’t say I know every patrollers bindings but I do check out a lot of setups just out of interest. I pretty much look at every pair of skis around me. I don’t think I’m unusual for that on this website.

b0ssYall are hilarious, im watching the toxicity levels raising by the hour. Everyone is calling each other fat pieces of shit and recommending on3ps.

Jemswhere is this happening i am not seeing this

b0ss/r/skiing

Jemswent to r/skiing to talk some shit and ended up getting in an argument with a TGR forum elitist about how jeffrey 102s aren’t a floppy noodle that can’t handle any advanced skiing

b0ssYou got in an argument with me you idiot!

Jemsno way that’s you considering that person is on r/skiing literally all day everyday

K-Dot.carcinogenic animal products

SendyMcSendyfaceI'm too old to argue with people on reddit anymore, tryna make my life more peaceful, not less

TWoodslol

K-Dot.https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat

https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/spotlight/2022/08/ccg-zheng-jnutr.html

K-Dot.https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat

https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/spotlight/2022/08/ccg-zheng-jnutr.html

SteezyYeeterwould the trolling be more chaotic if we knew who eachother was or not? 🤔

also please give good examples of trolling i feel like you have to be much more careful there than here please and thank you

**This post was edited on Aug 17th 2023 at 7:50:05pm

MichiganCatFartYour Reddit name is literally the same as your Newschoolers one

SteezyYeeter

let's go 😼

K-Dot.https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat

https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/spotlight/2022/08/ccg-zheng-jnutr.html

TWoods“
In the case of red meat, the classification is based on limited evidence from epidemiological studies showing positive associations between eating red meat and developing colorectal cancer as well as strong mechanistic evidence.

Limited evidence means that a positive association has been observed between exposure to the agent and cancer but that other explanations for the observations (technically termed chance, bias, or confounding) could not be ruled out.”



lolllllll

“WHO”

LOLLLLLLLL

TWoods“
In the case of red meat, the classification is based on limited evidence from epidemiological studies showing positive associations between eating red meat and developing colorectal cancer as well as strong mechanistic evidence.

Limited evidence means that a positive association has been observed between exposure to the agent and cancer but that other explanations for the observations (technically termed chance, bias, or confounding) could not be ruled out.”



lolllllll

“WHO”

LOLLLLLLLL

BIIIGZhomie really just googled “red meat causes cancer” and copy pasted the first two links that came up

TWoodsThe WHO “study” (results of a focus group looking at a bunch of papers together) is the scientific equivalent of “source: trust me bro”

b0ssThe same people who think we need to eat insects!🤮

Pablo_SanchezI’m more scared of getting a prion disease from venison than cancer from red meats

**This post was edited on Aug 19th 2023 at 1:52:10am

K-Dot.https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat

https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/spotlight/2022/08/ccg-zheng-jnutr.html

hi_vis360You already have one it just won’t kick in for 20 years