j.rocAgree with this 100%... I'd prioritize housing and proximity to your nearest resort(s) over state tax and other factors.
The 'well paid' aspect is a double edged sword, I imagine. Assuming that tourist trap ski towns like Park City or Vail will have higher paying jobs, that's only because the cost of living is so high in those places... I'd look for lower pay in a less expensive area, with a huge emphasis on avoiding the crowded/tourist filled resorts.
Personally, I'd pick the resort(s) that I most want to ski at, and work backwards from there.
The interesting thing with the pay is that some of that the mega corps have put out company wode baseline pay I believe. So working at a Vail mtn in the northeast you would still have min $20 whish is huge depending on location as towns are necessarily ski towns. Some are but you have more options.
Friend was paying 2500 near Jhole. Shes moving to another mtn for cheaper rent. Another friend posted somebody renting out a trailer as a studio in Victor for 2,300. Shits wild these days.
If the housing market crashes or dips, I hope some of these mtns take advantage and buy up some stuff. Ski towns are going to keep getting more priced out. Airbnb and remote work have really driven the price up. A lot of long term rentals have sold.
It will be interesting to see what the big ski areas do. Sure you can get some workers for a season or 2 even if the housing situation sucks, but will be hard to retain employees. They need employees to keep it going. I feel like housing makes the most sense but they'll probably have to keep raising wages too.
Housing is probably my number 1 priority when I move to another spot. The places that have a good amount will do alright. The places that have little to none will keep struggling.