Member of the Month

theabortionator
April, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Armada ARV 86 vs. Line TW Pro

profile picture
shuvit
Posts: 19 - Karma: 81
I’m debating between these two for my park skis next year. I want something that’s light, poppy, and durable. I’m new to park but not new to skiing. What do you guys think?
2 years ago
4 5
profile picture
womp*glomp
Posts: 167 - Karma: 1,155
Lines are not durable I REPEAT LINE IS NOT DURABLE 💀💀
shuvitI’m debating between these two for my park skis next year. I want something that’s light, poppy, and durable. I’m new to park but not new to skiing. What do you guys think?
2 years ago
9 0
profile picture
Vish-shoe
Posts: 1949 - Karma: 14,598
shuvitlight, poppy, and durable.

189 wet
2 years ago
13 0
profile picture
BIIIGZ
Posts: 244 - Karma: 2,358
My ARV 86 served me well learning park and have held up for 3 seasons of straight up abuse. Clipping rails, knocking edges together, skiing over rocks, they are still perfectly skiable with a few edge cracks, top sheet damage (to be expected with Armada & most park skis), and sidewall dents. They are fairly stiff but definitely break in and are a super versatile ski for learning park. Very durable.

I haven’t skiid the Twalls but from what i’ve heard they are somewhat equal but have a slightly better flex profile/pop/shape, but at the cost of lots of durability issues.
2 years ago
4 0
profile picture
shuvit
Posts: 19 - Karma: 81
BIIIGZMy ARV 86 served me well learning park and have held up for 3 seasons of straight up abuse. Clipping rails, knocking edges together, skiing over rocks, they are still perfectly skiable with a few edge cracks, top sheet damage (to be expected with Armada & most park skis), and sidewall dents. They are fairly stiff but definitely break in and are a super versatile ski for learning park. Very durable.

I haven’t skiid the Twalls but from what i’ve heard they are somewhat equal but have a slightly better flex profile/pop/shape, but at the cost of lots of durability issues.


Thanks for the help, are the ARVs light? That’s one of the main things I’m looking for
2 years ago
2 1
profile picture
BIIIGZ
Posts: 244 - Karma: 2,358
The ARV 86 in 170 length are 1550g per ski and the Twalls are slightly heavier at 1800g for the 171 length, but they are also wider at 90 underfoot, so the ARV are lighter. You can also just look this up yourself lol. The weight of skis sometimes changes between model years and obviously changes between different ski lengths.
2 years ago
5 0
profile picture
BIIIGZ
Posts: 244 - Karma: 2,358
shuvitThanks for the help

for sure man
2 years ago
2 0
profile picture
Agate420
Posts: 180 - Karma: 1,589
If you want your skis to last more than half a season i would go with the ARV 86
2 years ago
3 0
profile picture
KilaTsunami
Posts: 3336 - Karma: 32,102
I rode both of them at demo day last year . TW Pro blew it out of the water in my opinion. ARV was too stiff and just not playful enough for my liking. TW had juuuuust enough flex to fling u on and off stuff.
2 years ago
2 1
profile picture
shuvit
Posts: 19 - Karma: 81
KilaTsunamiI rode both of them at demo day last year . TW Pro blew it out of the water in my opinion. ARV was too stiff and just not playful enough for my liking. TW had juuuuust enough flex to fling u on and off stuff.


I don’t really care about flex, I’m just learning so I want something that’s light and poppy more than anything else
2 years ago
2 1
profile picture
KilaTsunami
Posts: 3336 - Karma: 32,102
shuvitI don’t really care about flex, I’m just learning so I want something that’s light and poppy more than anything else


Tw pro all day, But as I’m sure you know by reading threads on here. The sidewalls are fragile. Detune heavily and tread lightly. Handle with care
2 years ago
3 1
profile picture
Zurg
Posts: 1528 - Karma: 5,164
I skied both last year. I would definitely recommend getting arvs over the TWalls. Unfortunately I only had a dozen days before my TWalls blew up underfoot. The arvs went strong for the 20 days I used them with no issues. I will agree with the posts above that are saying the wallischs are lighter and more playful. That being said it isn't a huge difference in the weight and playfulness.
2 years ago
3 0
profile picture
Pakanaka
Posts: 319 - Karma: 1,968
I been telling people for years that line skis are not durable. people only just catching on now.
2 years ago
3 0
profile picture
Liamsasd
Posts: 193 - Karma: 1,036
Dont get the Tw’s seen multiple blow up in mere hours or days, they are good skis for the 5 minutes they last you but then you have 2 sets of ski blades so
2 years ago
2 0
profile picture
FaunaSkis
Posts: 628 - Karma: 6,833
shuvitI want something that’s light, poppy, and durable.

our Alparka sounds like it could be a good fit. Good for some quick progression all over the park.
2 years ago
4 0
profile picture
shuvit
Posts: 19 - Karma: 81
I ended up going with the ARVs if anyone was wondering, thanks for the help everyone :-)
2 years ago
2 1
All times are Eastern (-4); Currently it's 5:23PM