Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
steve0Sub'd for responses... I'm looking for the same thing.
Those CT 2.0's were/are so much fun. The Mana 2.0's they replaced them with were way stiffer and didn't seem as playful.
Thinking these options might be close, but haven't seen any of them in person:
https://seasoneqpt.com/products/nexus-ski
https://www.armadaskis.com/en-us/shop/product/arv-106-ra0000404.html#color=26157
Vish-shoeThose zootspace skis
tutipupswow so funny
Shh-RammerK2 Reckoner 102, pretty much the same ski
tutipupsread too many things about durability tho, might try some poachers
Shh-RammerI get that, but that's what made the candide 2's so fun. It's hard to have a super durable and flexible fun ski at the same time. Poachers are solid, won't be as playful. Opposite for reckoner too, just depends on how you ski and what you want.
tutipupsi dont recall everybody saying they delamed their candides in 4 days like they did with the reckoners
steve0Took me about 24 days.
steve0Took me about 24 days.
Greg_KBlackops 98 would be a similar shaped ski that has the rubber damping tip/tail and metal underfoot(1 sheet Vs 2 on the 21 CT 2.0) so it’s a bit lighter but solid feel. Haven’t heard of any 21 Fisher built skis with any issues as they were super overbuilt that year. Much lighter again in the 22 and 23(Mana 2) Atomic built ones.
tutipupsi dont recall everybody saying they delamed their candides in 4 days like they did with the reckoners
skidemon22Is the blackops metal a binding plate or is it on the bottom of the core like the CT?