Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
cndrAfter skiing a lot of others, zip, intuition, etc, I'll never ski anything other than their foam customs. It's pricey but I generally get 400ish days out of them and the feel and performance is unmatched for me. As a note, they generally work better on a traditional style boot rather than the FT style, so that could be a hang up for some on here.
KilaTsunamiNS will never sacrifice style for practicality
cndrAfter skiing a lot of others, zip, intuition, etc, I'll never ski anything other than their foam customs. It's pricey but I generally get 400ish days out of them and the feel and performance is unmatched for me. As a note, they generally work better on a traditional style boot rather than the FT style, so that could be a hang up for some on here.
LenntIve seen them fit tons of full tilts and now K2s 3 piece boot. They set them up with high end liners with heating and do the molding there when you buy em. Nearly 1/8th of surefoots inventory was K2s 3 pieces where im at.
I was just curious how the cork infections zipfit does compair to the surefoot fitting system. Ive seen people get 1000 days out of a zipfit so 400 isnt really that great especially if you have to pay for molding sessions. But if the performance is better Ide be intrested.
dkelsI've heard of both great success stories and tragic failures with custom surefoot foam liners. What Craig from Patriot Footbeds said was that the success of custom foam liners is 100% dependent on how sober/skilled the tech performing the job is. If they are inexperienced and screw up the injection, you can end up with a very poorly fitting liner. I think this gives the advantage to Zipfit as you can add material later as needed.