A quick word on blocking ads
It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
eheathYou'd be better of with a gh3 IMO the af100 was sort of a half assed version of the sony fs100.
WoFlowzalr. i was looking at it cause it was relatively cheap compared to another hmc or hpx and i could get the scene files to match up with my hmc. plus i figured there might be some nice fish eyes out there for it
eheathThe thing is, the af100 only does 720p60 and 1080p30, which is similar to the hmc/hpx but I think you could match a gh3 for much less, same lenses. Only thing the af100 has over the gh3 is built in NDs, unless you're getting an af100 for less than $500 id look into the gh3.
isaacwrongSecond what eheath said..it's a cool lil setup but a gh3, cage and fish is practically the same price, and going to give you better quality vid. Chris from @860media* used the af100 in a bunch of vids prior to gh5
eheathThe thing is, the af100 only does 720p60 and 1080p30, which is similar to the hmc/hpx but I think you could match a gh3 for much less, same lenses. Only thing the af100 has over the gh3 is built in NDs, unless you're getting an af100 for less than $500 id look into the gh3.
860media*Also..... the AF100 can record in 1080 60p just doesn't record sound.
eheathThat's right, over cranked only maybe? Either way, it was never that good, I remember when it first came out and I almost bought it, but then the fs100 came out
