Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
PakanakaAnyone got crushin cans that can give review?
how similar to jeffery's are they?
SessionThey are basically a Magnus 102.
rojo.grandeThe first crushing cans that came out are on the old mag 102 platform I’m almost positive so read any of the reviews online for that. I’m not sure if they changed the shape it’s run on yet, but I do know the mango 100 is coming at some point to replace the mag 102
weastcoatI would kill for the filthy rich to come back. What’s the deal with the huge decline in symmetrical park skis? Kinda annoying honestly, I don’t wanna feel like a damn goon doing a switch 2 or making switch carves.
weastcoatI would kill for the filthy rich to come back. What’s the deal with the huge decline in symmetrical park skis? Kinda annoying honestly, I don’t wanna feel like a damn goon doing a switch 2 or making switch carves.
RudyGarmischWe’re talking 5mm difference. I’m still going to hold out and say that when you are skiing switch, you significantly change where your center of gravity is in relation to the center of sidecut anyways, and sidecut, flex and mount point is much more impactful to the ‘feel’ than geometry differences that small. I’ve also tried symmetrical and non sym versions of some skis back to back, and for me, it’s honestly hard to tell the difference. But the placebo effect is a real effect.
weastcoatDefinitely not a placebo. I’ve been riding full symmetric for 4 seasons now and recently tried on my buddies skis that had a 6mm difference between tip and tail and I could definitely notice a difference. It just feels more unstable. I don’t like seeing skinny ass tails when I ski switch, and I can definitely feel it.
RudyGarmischWhat brands and what models. I would almost assure you the differences you feel are more from construction and not geometry.
weastcoatOn3p mag 102 for a few runs and used ro
rids the 90 for a whole season. has a 6 mm difference if I am correct, also tried nomad 95s on for a run (10mm difference) and I didn’t like the feel of those switch it was way more noticeable than the on3ps. Guess it’s something I’ll have to get used to since the nomads are something I’ll likely switch to. But I would like to try the on3ps again in a 181.
rojo.grandeNgl I do definitely notice a difference between fully symmetrical and asymm so I agree w u there, but I don’t think it’s as drastic as you make it out to be. Riding any ski from the ski ur used to and ride daily feels like a massive difference. But I think a few days to get the feel of a setup would make the difference less intense
weastcoatYou should sell me your cans if you ever get rid of them.
rojo.grandeYou ain’t gotta say a word more. Might have to pry em from me tho, my fatass loves the backbone these bad bitches got
weastcoatI’m interested to see how the nutty rocker on those performs when trying butters/nollies and shit. Plus I would appreciate the absolute brick solid sound those things give in landings. Seriously considering picking up a used pair.
