Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
Farmville420LOL the commentators. “I am irate right now” ME TOO BRO
Michigan_SucksSnowboarding but whatever, a 91 for that run is criminal.
Abomber22Too soon, but ya.
He wins on third round
SquirtleIt’s weird that everyone is calling his truck “triple cork”. It’s impressive as fuck, but def not a cork. Its more like a triple under flip. I feel like they just call everything a cork these days lol.
ColoradoDogfartlove how the announcers actually contested a score for once, and they his bro laced the world record for largest method in a halfpipe just for the meme. gave me flashbacks to how gus edited that one pic of him in the half pipe to make it look like he went higher
Farmville420I was just gonna make this thread. So fucked up me and my dad are sitting in the living room pissed now.
snomasterIt’s time to admit that figure skating has a better scoring format than action sports. Figure skaters can fall and still win because they pushed and crushed everything else. They make sure the best person wins.
snomasterIt’s time to admit that figure skating has a better scoring format than action sports. Figure skaters can fall and still win because they pushed and crushed everything else. They make sure the best person wins.
SofaKingSickyou can fall and still win in figure skating? that seems weird. falling is tight (tho ive never tried it myself) but a fall being part of a winning run?
extravertIts been this way as long as I can remember. If you set it as a cork its considered a cork even if it gets super flippy. It would be weird to say cork 7 to underflip 3, its just a dub 10.
BagOTricksWe need answers from the judges. It had to have been the worst fuck up in judged event history. Thank god he put down that final run...
skiermanI beg to differ, Shawn White getting a 100 with a hand drag at the X-Games was the biggest judging fuck up in history.
BagOTricksI'm genuinely confused on what they missed in the first run to give him that score? Did someone just accidentally enter the wrong number or something? Did they not realize it was a triple? How tf can the exact same run score 91.75 once and then 96? Yes he went higher/cleaner on the second, but that is a BIG jump for an identical run.
We need answers from the judges. It had to have been the worst fuck up in judged event history. Thank god he put down that final run...