Member of the Month

abjectwoe
May, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

176 or 181 jeffrey 110s

profile picture
Steezy-K
Posts: 9 - Karma: 32
Been wanting to purchase a set of jeffrey 110s for a while now but am not sure what size to go with. I’m about 5’8” 155lbs and I’d say I ski about 80% all mountain 20% park. These will be my daily drivers and I live in SLC. So should I be going with the 176s or 181s?
4 years ago
4 1
profile picture
RyanWhitdog
Posts: 201 - Karma: 1,169
Steezy-KBeen wanting to purchase a set of jeffrey 110s for a while now but am not sure what size to go with. I’m about 5’8” 155lbs and I’d say I ski about 80% all mountain 20% park. These will be my daily drivers and I live in SLC. So should I be going with the 176s or 181s?


176
4 years ago
6 1
profile picture
lilnoid666
Posts: 379 - Karma: 738
181
4 years ago
0 5
profile picture
Eightsails
Posts: 150 - Karma: 1,621
Message the ON3P crew on the website and they'll point you in the right direction, but they told me 181 on the 96s for 70/30 all mountain and I'm 5'8"ish and 175 lbs.
4 years ago
7 0
profile picture
kid-kapow
Posts: 203 - Karma: 1,071
I would go 181. I do not ride park at all, so some park skiers might tell you differently.

I am the same size as you and have owned both Kartel108s in 181 and Kartel98s in 176. I found the latter to ski on the short end for all mountain duties whereas the 181s were perfect size wise.

Remember - they have quite long rocker zones, sturdy flex underfoot and lots of splay, so they are super fun to pop off and over stuff, and they slay (in the playful meaning of the word) all kinds of soft snow conditions
4 years ago
5 1
profile picture
iggyskier
Posts: 10456 - Karma: 10,253
Typically would go 176cm at your height/weight.
4 years ago
13 0
profile picture
Steezy-K
Posts: 9 - Karma: 32
iggyskierTypically would go 176cm at your height/weight.

Ok I was thinking I should probably go 176 but I was just worried they’d be too short for big airs and drops. I know your skis run true to length though so they’ll probably ski longer than most 176s.
4 years ago
4 1
profile picture
Paul.
Posts: 1660 - Karma: 11,601
What length are you used to riding? Im about your size (150 and 5’7” on a good day) and I ride Jeffrey 108s and 114s in a 181, and magnus 102s in a 176. I prefer the 181s for pow and general all mountain skiing but they can be a little cumbersome in the park, width definitely plays a factor in that too though. It took a bit to get used to the 181s at first but I don't regret the choice at all.
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
Steezy-K
Posts: 9 - Karma: 32
Paul.What length are you used to riding? Im about your size (150 and 5’7” on a good day) and I ride Jeffrey 108s and 114s in a 181, and magnus 102s in a 176. I prefer the 181s for pow and general all mountain skiing but they can be a little cumbersome in the park, width definitely plays a factor in that too though. It took a bit to get used to the 181s at first but I don't regret the choice at all.

Im used to riding 170 length skis. My current ski is the faction ct 3.0 in 176 length. I just didn’t know if I should be sizing up now or sticking with that length
4 years ago
0 0
profile picture
RyanWhitdog
Posts: 201 - Karma: 1,169
How old are you
Steezy-KIm used to riding 170 length skis. My current ski is the faction ct 3.0 in 176 length. I just didn’t know if I should be sizing up now or sticking with that length
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
lil.lex
Posts: 8 - Karma: 56
181, on3ps rocker is crazy so the ski seems shorter than it is. I’m 5’1 on 161s and they feel perfect
4 years ago
0 3
profile picture
Steezy-K
Posts: 9 - Karma: 32
RyanWhitdogHow old are you

24 I won’t be growing anymore
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
kid-kapow
Posts: 203 - Karma: 1,071
I would listen to Iggy - aka the owner of ON3P Skis. After all, he designed them :)
4 years ago
3 0
profile picture
RyanWhitdog
Posts: 201 - Karma: 1,169
Steezy-K24 I won’t be growing anymore


Got it. Yeah I would go 176 personally. People on here are weird and want everyone to go over 180s but unless you really start to learn you love long skis, why not just go 176. I think you’ll have more fun with the 176s
4 years ago
2 0
profile picture
Jems
Posts: 7748 - Karma: 101,309
i ride them 176 and i’m 5’6, a little too long

**This post was edited on Dec 3rd 2021 at 12:05:21pm
4 years ago
2 0
profile picture
pmw
Posts: 5760 - Karma: 831
ive been struggling with this same question.

ive been on a 108 181 kartel for 3 yrs, love em to death. 5'7 150 type 3+. 50/50 all mountain/park. i drive the ski hard which the increased length has been suited towards, but especially with the jump to 110 wondering if a size down to 176 might help to offset that extra width/weight. i dont want to lose my ability to drive the ski hard at speed, but especially having more ski to move around now maybe a size down will help me be more agile?

any inout appreciated
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
RyanWhitdog
Posts: 201 - Karma: 1,169
pmwive been struggling with this same question.

ive been on a 108 181 kartel for 3 yrs, love em to death. 5'7 150 type 3+. 50/50 all mountain/park. i drive the ski hard which the increased length has been suited towards, but especially with the jump to 110 wondering if a size down to 176 might help to offset that extra width/weight. i dont want to lose my ability to drive the ski hard at speed, but especially having more ski to move around now maybe a size down will help me be more agile?

any inout appreciated


5’7 150 id also size down so you can have some more freedom in your ability to throw those hoes around but it’s up to you. I think at 5’7 150 on 176 sticks you’ll still have more than enough stability
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
pmw
Posts: 5760 - Karma: 831
181 awww yea. why change a good thing :)
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
soupcan
Posts: 364 - Karma: 562
Not to take part in the dick measuring contest but they do have quite a lot of rocker. Another way you could look at it is if you value stability or maneuverability more. The 176 would be wicked quick pivoting but I assume you lose quite a bit of stability.

For reference I’m 5’7” and 165lbs and ski the 181 but I don’t spin a ton and nothing over a 3. I just wanted a fun ski to ride that has some back bone.
4 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Steezy-K
Posts: 9 - Karma: 32
I do like to spin but usually only up to a 5 on the mountain and 7 in the park. But I also like to ski fast so I want something stable as well. I just think the 176 might not be stable enough, but I don’t know how the 181 will feel swing weight wise.
4 years ago
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4); Currently it's 4:39AM