Member of the Month

abjectwoe
May, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

K2 reckoner 92

profile picture
Reid69
Posts: 31 - Karma: 212
Yo has anyone used the reckoner 92s? Would they be good for like all mountain park ski becuase I found a good deal but I want to find some flexy parkish skis thanks y’all.
4 years ago
2 0
profile picture
muffMan.
Posts: 2903 - Karma: 27,741
Yeah they’d be alright, but really cheap ski. Reckoner 102 is better made and a better ski, I think @WoFlowz rides them
4 years ago
3 0
profile picture
Reid69
Posts: 31 - Karma: 212
Coleg55Yeah they’d be alright, but really cheap ski. Reckoner 102 is better made and a better ski, I think @WoFlowz rides them


Yeah… but I don’t wanna go from spending 300 dollars to 500 bucks. Unless you think it’s worth it
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
WoFlowz
Posts: 8104 - Karma: 64,492
Coleg55Yeah they’d be alright, but really cheap ski. Reckoner 102 is better made and a better ski, I think @WoFlowz rides them


Nah I don’t but @Celery skis the 102s I believe also OP check D-Structure or Corbett’s and change it to USD and see if they have them for a price ur willing to pay
4 years ago
2 0
profile picture
Celery
Posts: 2119 - Karma: 26,581
How tall are you? The 92s max out at 177 I think, and is meant as more of an option for smaller people or growing kids. Looks great on paper if you're the right size tho. Love my 102s.
4 years ago
2 0
profile picture
KCoCM
Posts: 963 - Karma: 8,787
i made the same thread like a month ago and i think the consensus was that the reck 92 is a reckoner in name alone and nothing else
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
Reid69
Posts: 31 - Karma: 212
KCoCMi made the same thread like a month ago and i think the consensus was that the reck 92 is a reckoner in name alone and nothing else


What does that mean
4 years ago
0 0
profile picture
KCoCM
Posts: 963 - Karma: 8,787
Reid69What does that mean


don’t really know tbh but the responses were enough to steer me clear. if i had to guess i’d guess the construction and materials were different and it doesn’t really fall in line with the playful all mount ski the reckoner line has a reputation for being but rather it’s a 92 waisted entry level twin tip aka it’s a reckoner in name alone. if the price point is what’s doing it for you look at honey badgers too
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
chills__
Posts: 302 - Karma: 3,615
Check out the NS review:

https://www.newschoolers.com/ski-gear/2022/Skis/1354/Reckoner-92

From what I read it's more of a beginner park ski and not meant for full grown adults. Probably fine if you're good with a 177 with a small waist for park
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
Non_State_Actor
Posts: 5098 - Karma: 18,685
WoFlowzNah I don’t but @Celery skis the 102s I believe also OP check D-Structure or Corbett’s and change it to USD and see if they have them for a price ur willing to pay


This.
D-structure had them on sale a few days ago for $419CAD which is like $340USD but rn they're full price.

Corbetts has them for $489CAD ~$410ish USD with free shipping in all sizes except 170
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
Reid69
Posts: 31 - Karma: 212
mystery3This.
D-structure had them on sale a few days ago for $419CAD which is like $340USD but rn they're full price.

Corbetts has them for $489CAD ~$410ish USD with free shipping in all sizes except 170


Problem is that it’s not free to alaska and I’m trying to keep whole thing below 550 cuz it’s not my main setup and I found some 92s for 300 on evo with 50 dollar shipping so I will only have 200 for bindings
4 years ago
2 0
profile picture
Reid69
Posts: 31 - Karma: 212
KCoCMdon’t really know tbh but the responses were enough to steer me clear. if i had to guess i’d guess the construction and materials were different and it doesn’t really fall in line with the playful all mount ski the reckoner line has a reputation for being but rather it’s a 92 waisted entry level twin tip aka it’s a reckoner in name alone. if the price point is what’s doing it for you look at honey badgers too

honey badgers only 350?
4 years ago
0 0
profile picture
bradwalters
Posts: 391 - Karma: 3,153
Reid69Yeah… but I don’t wanna go from spending 300 dollars to 500 bucks. Unless you think it’s worth it


Check @kaimahler’s Instagram. The most recent video on there he’s on the reckoner 92. Not as budget as most may think.
4 years ago
2 0
profile picture
lil.Boye
Posts: 2791 - Karma: 12,669
have heard that there have been problems with the reck 102 have blown out both in the tips and underfoot. a friend of mine got sent a two new pairs and ended up getting the new t-walls that he also blew out the same way. he's on the poachers now and they seem a whole lot sturdier than all of them. so if you ski hard i would say go poachers, they might be heavier but they will last a long time and is a really fun ski for everything park related.
4 years ago
1 1
profile picture
Non_State_Actor
Posts: 5098 - Karma: 18,685
Reid69Problem is that it’s not free to alaska and I’m trying to keep whole thing below 550 cuz it’s not my main setup and I found some 92s for 300 on evo with 50 dollar shipping so I will only have 200 for bindings


https://d-structure.com/products/skis-k2-x-jeremy-dean-reckoner-102-2021?variant=39499501404208

They are back down to $420 CAD...no idea on shipping and only in the 170cm length though the do measure true to stated length so probably about as long as a 174cm from many other companies.

Corbetts.com attacks are priced really well rn too.
4 years ago
1 0
All times are Eastern (-4); Currently it's 6:14PM