Line chronics vs Volkl revolt 95s

I've heard good things about the chronics but haven't skied them. I have skied all my deepest days (waist deepish) on my Revolt 95s and even tho it probably wasn't the best (center mount may have something to do with that), i always had a blast and never really had issues.

On the other hand, I almost always enjoyed my Kartel 108s in the park more than my revolts. Even tho they were wider and had lots more rocker, the only time the actual park ski was any better was skiing switch. I would rather have a better ski for all mountain that is good in the park than a better ski for park that is good for all mountain.

Chronics are a Blast. They ski park and all mountain far better then expected. But depending were you live, a "big mountain " per say something like the Jeffrey 108 or reckoner 102 could be more up your alley

I had both last year. Better for park - chronic. Better for off-piste - Revolt 95. No question on this one.

BradFiAusNzCoCaI had both last year. Better for park - chronic. Better for off-piste - Revolt 95. No question on this one.

Is there a serious difference between the revolts and chronics off piste?

Revolts felt more stable and stiffer while being able to pivot more. Chronics have more camber and are softer so they aren’t as solid off piste. Not as easy to turn quickly and the flex gets bounced around

skiiiiitIs there a serious difference between the revolts and chronics off piste?