Stranger

Check out the roof box review.

CeleryCheck out the roof box review.

yeah already read it, but was hoping to hear from some users here too

I only have one day on the ski but I was super impressed by its hard snow performance especially for being a 100mm waist “freestyle” ski. It definitely felt mounted a bit too far back at recommend. Seems like 2.5ish cm back from center of contact points would be ideal

mrk127I only have one day on the ski but I was super impressed by its hard snow performance especially for being a 100mm waist “freestyle” ski. It definitely felt mounted a bit too far back at recommend. Seems like 2.5ish cm back from center of contact points would be ideal

It’s not a freestyle ski. The design was intended to make it a fun carver similar to the Sakana. Athletes on their team ski it in the park but that is not it’s intended use.


OP, it skis really well on groomers. Holds a good edge for how wide it is. The recommended line is pretty far back, like -10 I think. Some people are moving up pretty far, I know Mike Hornbeck rides his at the center of the contact points but this will tank the edge hold if you’re concerned about that. Fun ski for sure but not a park ski by any means on my opinion.

animatorIt’s not a freestyle ski. The design was intended to make it a fun carver similar to the Sakana. Athletes on their team ski it in the park but that is not it’s intended use.


OP, it skis really well on groomers. Holds a good edge for how wide it is. The recommended line is pretty far back, like -10 I think. Some people are moving up pretty far, I know Mike Hornbeck rides his at the center of the contact points but this will tank the edge hold if you’re concerned about that. Fun ski for sure but not a park ski by any means on my opinion.

I guess I think of a freestyle ski and a park ski as different, but you right, it’s definitely not a park ski

animatorIt’s not a freestyle ski. The design was intended to make it a fun carver similar to the Sakana. Athletes on their team ski it in the park but that is not it’s intended use.


OP, it skis really well on groomers. Holds a good edge for how wide it is. The recommended line is pretty far back, like -10 I think. Some people are moving up pretty far, I know Mike Hornbeck rides his at the center of the contact points but this will tank the edge hold if you’re concerned about that. Fun ski for sure but not a park ski by any means on my opinion.

cheers! yeah I wouldn't really hit the park hard on these, mainly for those "just skiing" days with non-park skiers and slushy spring runs end of season. side hit fun and transfers. with the more mid mount like hornbeck it might feel better in the air.
I also rode them a bit further back
if I get a good deal I'd might get them.

mrk127I guess I think of a freestyle ski and a park ski as different, but you right, it’s definitely not a park ski

This is a fair point, freestyle skis do not necessarily equal park skis.