Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
TheMoostafianI was gonna post this in my stoke thread because I am fucking stoked about this but it seems also relevant here. I just bought a winch made in 1944 that used to be mounted on big navy ships. I'm gonna use it as a yarder to pull small trees up steep slopes. Check this fucker out.
https://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/1010214/VID-20210905-161613-hevc-mp4
Lonelytfw you don't have the money for a ponsse
SavageBiffYour a logger or mason or both? My best bud is a brick layer and has a saw mill I’ve worked at just to help and learn bc I think it’s cool and used to do a lot of residential and commercial tree work and line work, if I was younger I’d ask ya for a job, being retired is boring.
TheMoostafianBoth kind of. Most of what I do is stonework but I've done a lot of work as a forester and sometimes cool logging contracts fall in my lap.
TheMoostafianHaha yeah I definitely don't. I am getting a tower yarder though. I just thought this thing was cool. Could make a badass ropetow someday.
Lonely"Oh. You're cutting a bunch of ash to stop the spread of a terrible invasive species? You bastards hate the environment!"
CrunnchyVanManForests need disturbance to grow properly, logging when done right helps forests produce a sustainable amount of lumber instead of just clear cutting and having everything gone in 5 years. Or the other side of the coin is an undisturbed forest is more prone to wildfire
Edit: Clear cut logging is not good, sustainable forest management is good
**This post was edited on Sep 13th 2021 at 11:24:13am
LonelySome quick facts
-Trees gain most of their mass from the carbon they absorb. When they are cut down and used in buildings or furniture or other products, they act as carbon batteries. The carbon that they absorbed is not released. Making the carbon positive in terms of sequestration.
-Concrete and steel on the other hand require a huge carbon footprint in comparison to be fabricated/smelted/created. Resulting in net negative sequestration.
-Even if woody material is burned for energy, it is generally carbon neutral. If that tree absorbed 1 ton of carbon over its life, the 1 ton of carbon it releases does not change the amount of carbon originally in the biosphere, unlike natural gas or oil, which comes from outside of the biosphere deep within the earth.
-At least in most lands managed by the state/private companies in the states, more trees are planted than are cut in a harvest, or the harvest is designed to increase forest health
-The largest issues with deforestation come from agriculture and development. Harvesting trees for building materials, paper, furniture, etc. is actually pretty dang good for the environment. If we're really concerned about climate change, we should start building more wooden skyscrapers
coronaYou picked a pretty shit example here. The timber industry is pretty much the reason EAB spread so quick.