SuspiciousFishNow that we are going to spark up the war on terror again lets bring back the good old stick death videos from 2002.
https://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/1009372/Stick-Death---Martyr-Machine--Original-With-Slipknot-New-Abortion--mpg
Fuck here we go again man.
Damn too bad... a real heart felt song that blamed the wrong people.
Defining Catastrophic Terrorism
The evidence of a clear effort to take down the US becomes even more transparent just a year later in October of '98, when yet another dark document was conceived, called "Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy
."
If that title alone isn't enough to raise the ol' Spock eyebrow, then you are more than likely incapable of sentient reasoning. But let's hold on a minute here - just one short brief second... "Catastrophic Terrorism"... as a National Policy? Seriously? Well, that's exactly what the public and other government watchdogs were asking back then as well, and so guess what? All of a sudden - magically, overnight - that document suddenly had a new name... Catastrophic Terrorism: "Tackling the New Danger."
So, using our 20/20 hindsight once again, was that earlier title all just some form of eerie prescience, or was it an actual revealing preview of their true intended plans for this country? Thinking minds shouldn't have to parse that one about for too long.
Then there was the issue of that little subtitle...
"Imagining the 'transformative event.'" Seriously?
There are two key components to that title...
the act of "imagining," as well as the
"transformative event," the latter of which is actually two more things unto itself -
something "transformative," and in the form of an "event." Perhaps the only title more telling about its authors might have been "Daydreaming about the transformative event."
A very telling admission/concession of guilt came in the form of a later revision which shamelessly changed the subtitle to its present version, "Visions of Governance for the Twenty-First Century." Although, even that small revision reveals much about this
neocon/Likud aligned group group and its plans, because it blatantly spells out in its revised title, a new type of US governance is being implied.
Seymour Hersh should have to look no further than this treasonous moment in history for indications of a coup.
This new policy proposal was the byproduct of yet another tiny micro-group of neoconservative men, Ashton B. Carter, John Deutch, and Philip Zellikow. At the time, only John Deutch was publicly well known as the former Deputy Secretary of Defense from 1994-95, and Director of the CIA from 1995-96. Phillip Zellikow would "coincidentally" be later named as the head of the 9/11 Commission, while Ashton B. Carter would later become Secretary of Defense.
The thing most damning about the Catastrophic Terrorism (CT) study was their joint speculation on what would have happened had the 1993 World Trade Center bombing brought down the twin towers...
>>>"
Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America's fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949.
Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force."
The proposal then suggests,
>>>
"More violence could follow, either further terrorist attacks or U.S. counterattacks."
These members of the CT study also wrote:
>>>
"Readers should imagine the possibilities for themselves, because the most serious constraint on current policy is lack of imagination. An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America’s history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. Constitutional liberties would be challenged as the United States sought to protect itself from further attacks by pressing against allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and the use of deadly force. More violence would follow, either as other terrorists seek to imitate this great "success" or as the United States strikes out at those considered responsible." "Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future into a before and after." "Using imagination, we hope now to find some of the political will that we know would be there later, "after," because this nation prefers prevention to funereal reconstruction. When this threat becomes clear the President must be in a position to activate extraordinary capabilities."
This isn't a proposal as much as it is a full out plan... neocon aligned with the Likud daydreaming on how to orchestrate a coup.
Also, PNAC document:
>>>"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."
Welp, they got their convenient wish to impose all their domestic and most of their geopolitical agendas.
