BiffbarfHe denies the holocaust? Huh?
Well, perhaps he doesn't Deny the holocaust, but he's deeeefinitely a nazi cause sympathizer and I yes I have receipts.
Just look at how unapologetically pro-hitler he speaks here on H3 (which already spouts anti-allies whataboutism and nazi apologist bullshit while trying to entertain people with reaction videos)... he talks about how Hitler was just an OCD neat-freak who was simply trying to clean things up (because I guess jews and blacks and gypsys and disabled people are dirty? wtf Jordan), and how he had been some medal winning hero in ww1 (extremely debate-able) who then just saw all the horrible things happening to post-great war germany during the depression, and merely wanted to install order with his good ol boy nazi pals and make Germany great again... he goes on talking about how much crowds response to Hitler's rants influenced his speeches (omitting the fucked up shit he was spewing, not to mention all the dissent that existed amongst said crowds that was brutally shut down by his brownshirts) He claims that hitler was just influenced by the peoples reactions rather than the people being influenced by Hitler giving them scapegoats for all of their problems and convincing them to support his hate squad... Its a massive and complete misunderstanding on how tyrants obtain power and how manipulative narcissists like Hitler can be attractive once they rile a few people up... I could recommend some psych classes he should take, it might help him understand that (then again, he probably said something about how those classes shouldn't be taught somewhere in some quack lecture or interview he gave).
https://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/1009519/Jordan-Peterson-Shares-His-Thoughts-on-Hitler
https://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/1009406/Dave-Rubin-2020-Election-Meltdown---From-Cringe-to-CopeAnd then here he goes on some tyrade where he claims Hitler didnt actually care about winning the war and instead decided to fucking flip the table on Germany because 'they betrayed him with weakness' or some shit and decided to just cause as much chaos as possible by turning up the death in the nazi death camps rather than just enslaving everyone in order to win the war... not for a second realizing that the nazis actually hit the turbo button on the death camps in late 1941 before Pearl Harbour even happened during a time when Germany certainly wasn't losing the war as they advanced deep into Soviet territory... He says that this was actually Hitler's true motive once things started going south... which is absolutely not supported historically, nor within Hitler's ideology or personal beliefs at all.
He goes on saying that simple minded economists who blame Nazi Germany's loss on a lack of resources are wrong..
Fucking lol. Its hard to win a blitzkreig war when your oil is shut off and you cant even get rubber to build tires for your mechanized divisions, Jordan. for fuck sake dont tell me about what the inuits were able to live with - they never fought a 2 front war against 2 industrial superpowers and a global empire, you jackass.
And in the middle of all of this, he says, and I quote 'The glorious, everlasting 4th.. errm.. 3rd reich'. Nobody talks about the FOURTH reich dude. Nobody makes that mistake, much less a guy with a phd. Thats a major dog whistle to nazi sympathizers who are the only ones who ever actually talk about a Fourth Reich...
Im going to go ahead and use his own philosophy here.. where he quotes 'i think it was Jung' (you know damn right it was jung, you just quoted him for the zillioth time) and says that if you cant figure out what someone is doing or why, Look at the outcome. Well.. from that, Id say the outcome is this whole lecture isnt convincing anyone about some notion that Hitler didnt want to win the war and instead wanted to cause destruction... Its all about what he claims Nazis or right wing authoritarians SHOULD do in order to prolong their power and control... What he's secretly doing here is appealing to potential neonazis who at the very least respect Hitler's ideas and strategy but believe he was the wrong man to finish the job, due to his poor tactics and decisions. All of that is hidden within some lecture that's supposedly to focus on how evil Hitler is, and is titled as such... when really its just that 'Hitler was bad at his job, and he could have done it better and more successfully had he done this instead' The dude is literally describing a blueprint for the alt-right in broad daylight its fucked up man.
https://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/1009407/How-Hitler-was-Even-More-Evil-Than-You-Think---Prof--Jordan-Peterson
Fuck Jordan Petersen. I feel pity for anyone he's influenced.
(aside, no idea where or how this dan rubin thing got in here whatever that is)
**This post was edited on Aug 29th 2021 at 3:36:00am