Charlie_KellyGonna get downvoted but climate is always changing my guy. Has to do with solar orbit, axis, and ice cover.
https://www.nytimes.com/article/climate-change-global-warming-faq.html
https://news.stanford.edu/news/2013/august/climate-change-speed-080113.html
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/todays-climate-change-proves-much-faster-than-changes-in-past-65-million-years/
As is usual with varying levels of denialism and misdirection, there is a kernel of truth to what you say. Yet you omitted the other extremely important variables in the equation, which, unsurprisingly, are the human-caused variables.
Let's say, for the sake of argument, that the actions of humans have 0 effects on the
climate changing at a rapid rate that is much faster than many other instances of warming in millions or thousands of years (since climate change which is widely understood is apparently not correct enough terminology). Isn't what we are currently experiencing still a dire problem? Even if it is not humans that are causing it, which would go against the consensus of nearly the entire scientific community and decades of research, isn't the fact that many areas of the earth are becoming less and less viable for humans to live in, with a large growing population a problem we should do something about?
I'm pretty sure people still try to minimize the damage of hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, and other natural disasters even if they themselves did not cause those natural disasters.
So even if humans are not the blame, is this not a problem that should be taken care of?
