Member of the Month

abjectwoe
May, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Thoughts on Reckoner 122s

profile picture
SmokedGouda
Posts: 1233 - Karma: 6,878
Ok, since I can’t find any threads on this, I was just curious what your thoughts were on the ski and where it shines the most. I just recently picked them up and found joy with it on both steeps, slush bumps, crud and pow and are surprisingly maneuverable(easy to pivot). Haven’t hit cliffs with em yet, but with the stability they offered me on smaller hits like catwalks, I bet it’d be quite the trip. Curious to hear from others.

**This thread was edited on Apr 30th 2021 at 4:18:42am
4 years ago
7 0
profile picture
DesertStix
Posts: 2543 - Karma: 15,021
I think the 102 is arguably my favorite ski I’ve ever owned. Definitely the most fun. They say the 122 is just a little more beefy and I imagine it’s nasty on deep days. Pretty sure Karl was on them on a very recent trip to Alaska if you want to go check his IG
SmokedGoudaOk, since I can’t find any threads on this, I was just curious what your thoughts were on the ski and where it shines the most. I just recently picked them up and found joy with it on both steeps, slush bumps, crud and pow and are surprisingly maneuverable(easy to pivot). Haven’t hit cliffs with em yet, but with the stability they offered me on smaller hits like catwalks, I bet it’d be quite the trip. Curious to hear from others.

**This thread was edited on Apr 30th 2021 at 4:18:42am
4 years ago
4 0
profile picture
piss.boy
Posts: 1491 - Karma: 10,621
I got myself a pair of 102 last season and they are extremely fun. No idea how park guys ride them every day though they hurt my knees so bad @tendinitous
4 years ago
1 4
profile picture
WoFlowz
Posts: 8103 - Karma: 64,483
Piss_BoyI got myself a pair of 102 last season and they are extremely fun. No idea how park guys ride them every day though they hurt my knees so bad @tendinitous


Piss boy more like bitch boy. I ski 106 in the park everyday
4 years ago
11 7
profile picture
BradFiAusNzCoCa
Posts: 7539 - Karma: 67,053
He mentioned tendinitis. He’s a growing kid. Easy now
WoFlowzPiss boy more like bitch boy. I ski 106 in the park everyday
4 years ago
4 0
profile picture
h3nry.
Posts: 216 - Karma: 3,500
Piss_BoyI got myself a pair of 102 last season and they are extremely fun. No idea how park guys ride them every day though they hurt my knees so bad @tendinitous

If your setup isn’t looking as wide as this are you even core?

4 years ago
12 0
profile picture
DesertStix
Posts: 2543 - Karma: 15,021
Because they’re noodles or because of the width?
Piss_BoyI got myself a pair of 102 last season and they are extremely fun. No idea how park guys ride them every day though they hurt my knees so bad @tendinitous
4 years ago
0 0
profile picture
WoFlowz
Posts: 8103 - Karma: 64,483
BradFiAusNzCoCaHe mentioned tendinitis. He’s a growing kid. Easy now


And I’m not a growing kid? I’m like a year older than him
4 years ago
0 4
profile picture
lil.Boye
Posts: 2791 - Karma: 12,669
heard that they are a bit like the pettitors and the other old k2 pow skis. Playful and buttery. But still quite stable when needed. The 112 rips atleast
4 years ago
0 0
profile picture
BradFiAusNzCoCa
Posts: 7539 - Karma: 67,053
You may not have tendinitis. No reason to put someone down. Why would he ski a wide ski if it hurts his knees?
WoFlowzAnd I’m not a growing kid? I’m like a year older than him
4 years ago
5 1
profile picture
WoFlowz
Posts: 8103 - Karma: 64,483
BradFiAusNzCoCaYou may not have tendinitis. No reason to put someone down. Why would he ski a wide ski if it hurts his knees?


Cause wider skis look better and skiing skis are dumb IMO
4 years ago
2 8
profile picture
BradFiAusNzCoCa
Posts: 7539 - Karma: 67,053
You just nailed it on the head: in your opinion.
WoFlowzCause wider skis look better and skiing skis are dumb IMO
4 years ago
7 1
profile picture
piss.boy
Posts: 1491 - Karma: 10,621
DesertStixBecause they’re noodles or because of the width?


Mainly because of the width. Honestly I do not find them to be as soft as most people say
4 years ago
0 0
profile picture
piss.boy
Posts: 1491 - Karma: 10,621
WoFlowzPiss boy more like bitch boy. I ski 106 in the park everyday


If you think having wider skis is a major factor in how good someone looks while skiing then im gonna piss all over you someday
4 years ago
14 0
profile picture
WoFlowz
Posts: 8103 - Karma: 64,483
Piss_BoyIf you think having wider skis is a major factor in how good someone looks while skiing then im gonna piss all over you someday


Hey man I don’t have a piss kink so please don’t. If you’re into that stuff Ik @Ankilla is
4 years ago
2 7
profile picture
DesertStix
Posts: 2543 - Karma: 15,021
Ah my first rails were on fully rockered and heavy 107 waisted skis lol so I find them to be the perfect medium. I have prodigy 1.0 but those can feel unstable. I’m also not doing switch ups or spinning off rails.

As far as the flex, it’s all in the tips and tails. You’re right about the ski being relatively stiffer underfoot. I legit worry about snapping them if I throw my weight all the way forwards or backwards. I’m also like almost 200 lbs haha
Piss_BoyMainly because of the width. Honestly I do not find them to be as soft as most people say
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
piss.boy
Posts: 1491 - Karma: 10,621
DesertStixAh my first rails were on fully rockered and heavy 107 waisted skis lol so I find them to be the perfect medium. I have prodigy 1.0 but those can feel unstable. I’m also not doing switch ups or spinning off rails.

As far as the flex, it’s all in the tips and tails. You’re right about the ski being relatively stiffer underfoot. I legit worry about snapping them if I throw my weight all the way forwards or backwards. I’m also like almost 200 lbs haha


yeahhhh mine are mounted -2 and i way 130
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
DesertStix
Posts: 2543 - Karma: 15,021
Mine are whatever the team line is. -2 back from true center. At 130 you’re gonna have a hard time flexing anything too much other than a blend or wet
Piss_Boyyeahhhh mine are mounted -2 and i way 130
4 years ago
2 0
profile picture
gorbdawggybrent
Posts: 970 - Karma: 8,774
WoFlowzAnd I’m not a growing kid? I’m like a year older than him


And imma year older then you 😈😈😈
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
WoFlowz
Posts: 8103 - Karma: 64,483
gorbdawggybrentAnd imma year older then you 😈😈😈


But do you skiing skinny skis?
4 years ago
0 2
profile picture
gorbdawggybrent
Posts: 970 - Karma: 8,774
WoFlowzBut do you skiing skinny skis?


Magnus 102s boiiiii
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
WoFlowz
Posts: 8103 - Karma: 64,483
gorbdawggybrentMagnus 102s boiiiii


Ok so you’re not a pussy
4 years ago
1 2
profile picture
gorbdawggybrent
Posts: 970 - Karma: 8,774
WoFlowzOk so you’re not a pussy


Oh believe me, I’m a pussy
4 years ago
5 0
profile picture
WoFlowz
Posts: 8103 - Karma: 64,483
gorbdawggybrentOh believe me, I’m a pussy


But the wide ski aren’t the reason
4 years ago
2 1
profile picture
Koshermilk
Posts: 515 - Karma: 1,914
Piss_BoyMainly because of the width. Honestly I do not find them to be as soft as most people say


They got hinge points on the tips and tails, you just gotta pop enough to get to them
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
Koshermilk
Posts: 515 - Karma: 1,914
DesertStixAh my first rails were on fully rockered and heavy 107 waisted skis lol so I find them to be the perfect medium. I have prodigy 1.0 but those can feel unstable. I’m also not doing switch ups or spinning off rails.

As far as the flex, it’s all in the tips and tails. You’re right about the ski being relatively stiffer underfoot. I legit worry about snapping them if I throw my weight all the way forwards or backwards. I’m also like almost 200 lbs haha


Big fscts lmao I snapped one my of 102’s tips in 4 days on em and the other tip Delammed lol
4 years ago
0 1
profile picture
DesertStix
Posts: 2543 - Karma: 15,021
Hope the warranty covered that lol
KoshermilkBig fscts lmao I snapped one my of 102’s tips in 4 days on em and the other tip Delammed lol
4 years ago
2 0
profile picture
Koshermilk
Posts: 515 - Karma: 1,914
DesertStixHope the warranty covered that lol


ya sent them in a couple weeks ago still haven't got the tracking for the return yet tho lol
4 years ago
1 0
profile picture
bradwalters
Posts: 391 - Karma: 3,153
My opinion is biased on these but I'll give it regardless.

122 is a great ski. Lighter and more playful than the Catamaran but still holds up when you need it to. I ski these when you actually need a 122 width and I haven't had a bad day on them yet. Nice and floaty. Team Mount point has been serving me well.

112 (191) is my daily driver. I ski these if I just need to grab a ski without thinking about what I'm riding that day. I ski them in mellow pow, groomers, park, whatever. My personal favorite ski that I have had in years. I have these set at the team mount point. Also, I know that I am in the minority on people who ski the 112 in the park. Most opt for the 102 if thats the move.

102 - Most people who I work with or know who ski the reckoner line use this ski for their more resort and park oriented ski. Including the team as you've probably have seen. With Mt. Hood summer coming up I am setting up a pair of 102s to get the job done but that doesn't mean that I'm leaving the 112 at home. :)

Hope that helps.
4 years ago
7 0
profile picture
cndr
Posts: 163 - Karma: 880
Only got a handful of days on them this year, but love it. Team line mount. Definitely lighter than the catamaran, but I'd say a little less "bouncy" if that makes any sense. It'll still arc a nice wide turn on groomers and holds up on variable stuff, but as Brad said it's definity a ski specifically designed for deep days.

Whereas I would take the catamaran out on any day or condition just to mess around, the R122 is a ski I take out only when the conditions really call for it. R102 is my daily.
4 years ago
2 0
All times are Eastern (-4); Currently it's 4:51AM