Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Ski size........

profile picture
sullivano*b
Posts: 1233 - Karma: 8,127
i’m 5’ 10-11” and 14 rn but i’ll be 6’1” easily next year i had 172 edollos this season and next i’m getting wets. should i go for 189? long ski steeze but will it fit in my moms 2004 honda civic? and is it to much of a jump? too heavy? help
Apr 8 2021 3:52PM
4 1
profile picture
dwt802
Posts: 3257 - Karma: 32,126
If you’re already 5’11 you should be riding a bigger ski, probably a 180ish non rocketed ski so I think the 189 Vishnu would be in your best interest in that regard due to how much rocker they have. They’re a light ski and I think it would feel normal for you to ride them at your current height not to mention growing another inch or two. Not sure as to if they’ll fit in the car though lmao
Apr 8 2021 4:33PM
4 0
profile picture
sullivano*b
Posts: 1233 - Karma: 8,127
dwt802If you’re already 5’11 you should be riding a bigger ski, probably a 180ish non rocketed ski so I think the 189 Vishnu would be in your best interest in that regard due to how much rocker they have. They’re a light ski and I think it would feel normal for you to ride them at your current height not to mention growing another inch or two. Not sure as to if they’ll fit in the car though lmao


i was like 5’ 6” when i got the edollos and they didn’t have a 180 so that’s why there too short but i think i’m gonna have to get a roof rack of some sort
Apr 8 2021 4:35PM
3 0
profile picture
jjdsteeze
Posts: 2562 - Karma: 4,136
You’d be fine on 183 or 189.
Apr 8 2021 7:47PM
2 0
profile picture
lilnoid666
Posts: 379 - Karma: 738
get 183, thats already like 7cm over your head. so whatever "steeze" you think you are gonna get from 189s will be over looked by the fact that they are too big and too hard to ski with.
Apr 8 2021 7:50PM
0 3
profile picture
sullivano*b
Posts: 1233 - Karma: 8,127
sams15get 183, thats already like 7cm over your head. so whatever "steeze" you think you are gonna get from 189s will be over looked by the fact that they are too big and too hard to ski with.


everytime you’ve responded to me with has sounded pissed off or condescending kinda and it’s a fact that long skis look better. plus it’s 3 cm over my head not 7

**This post was edited on Apr 8th 2021 at 7:54:12pm
Apr 8 2021 7:52PM
2 0
profile picture
lilnoid666
Posts: 379 - Karma: 738
sullivanobrien_everytime you’ve responded to me with has sounded pissed off or condescending kinda


aye my bad, no hate. but imo 183 would be the best
Apr 8 2021 7:54PM
1 1
profile picture
sullivano*b
Posts: 1233 - Karma: 8,127
The referenced post has been removed.


i think that’s what’ll i do thanks
Apr 8 2021 7:54PM
1 0
profile picture
sullivano*b
Posts: 1233 - Karma: 8,127
sams15aye my bad, no hate. but imo 183 would be the best


i just did the math and if i’m 6’1 then the 189 4 cm taller than me (and i might be even more than 6’1). which is good bc tbh i’m gonna be 6’4” or more full grown so i might as well go with 189. but idk
Apr 8 2021 7:59PM
1 0
profile picture
ColoradoDogfart
Posts: 2456 - Karma: 29,269
Op just remember

Long skis=Big pp big swag
short skis=small pp no swag
Apr 8 2021 8:03PM
2 0
profile picture
sullivano*b
Posts: 1233 - Karma: 8,127
ColoradoDogfartOp just remember

Long skis=Big pp big swag
short skis=small pp no swag


of course
Apr 8 2021 8:04PM
0 1
profile picture
ColoradoDogfart
Posts: 2456 - Karma: 29,269
sullivanobrien_of course


Change your name back to vermontdogfart or you’ll forever have a small pp
Apr 8 2021 8:06PM
3 0
profile picture
lilnoid666
Posts: 379 - Karma: 738
sullivanobrien_i just did the math and if i’m 6’1 then the 189 4 cm taller than me (and i might be even more than 6’1). which is good bc tbh i’m gonna be 6’4” or more full grown so i might as well go with 189. but idk


You are right go 189
Apr 8 2021 8:13PM
0 1
profile picture
BradFiAusNzCoCa
Posts: 7073 - Karma: 61,971
I agree. I’m tired of people changing their username and photo because idk who is who
ColoradoDogfartChange your name back to vermontdogfart or you’ll forever have a small pp
Apr 9 2021 12:07AM
1 0
profile picture
Tucko
Posts: 228 - Karma: 1,922
I’m 5’ 5” 125lb, and 17 so don’t think much about growth. Would the 177 wets work for me? Thats 12 cm over my head.
Apr 10 2021 8:46AM
0 0
profile picture
sullivano*b
Posts: 1233 - Karma: 8,127
TuckoI’m 5’ 5” 125lb, and 17 so don’t think much about growth. Would the 177 wets work for me? Thats 12 cm over my head.


henrik uses 180s and is like 5’6 so you’re good especially since v’s have a lot less affective edge
Apr 10 2021 8:48AM
1 0
All times are Eastern (-5)