Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
WisconsinDogfartedit:I dont know much about the issue so take my OPINION with a grain of salt.
The american ski industry isnt nearly as much of a climate problem as this bullshit in china
All of that so “woke” people can upgrade to the more environmentally friendly iphone and get the latest funko pop because its “collectible”. The way i see it, we should be holding these nations that produce the most emissions accountable, especially when they dont seem to do anything about it. China produces roughly 1/3 of carbon emissions in the world.
Of course we can and should do our own part to reversing our carbon footprint, but we wont do nearly enough without cooperation from china and the rest of the world.
Next we should get rid of the idea of Consumerism.
Unfortunately, people arent going to commit to fixing the issue until it is too late
**This post was edited on Apr 1st 2021 at 12:57:53am
Coleg55Solar and wind is kinda shit tbh. Without proper maintenance they just get sent to a landfill when they break. Nuclear energy is the future
WoFlowzHow about hydro power it’s what powers pretty much the whole south east and doesn’t have toxic waste that sits for millions of years just spewing radiation
Coleg55A clean energy plant is not spewing toxic radiation. But yeah hydro power is very efficient. Canada used a lot of it. But nuclear energy is the way to go for most of our world
Coleg55Solar and wind is kinda shit tbh. Without proper maintenance they just get sent to a landfill when they break.
WoFlowzHow about hydro power it’s what powers pretty much the whole south east and doesn’t have toxic waste that sits for millions of years just spewing radiation
hud4raptorscoming from bc, where pretty much all our power is hydro, u'd be amazed at the irreparable damage done to rivers that hydro power does, but its kinda the best option
WoFlowzYeah I mean with all aspects of power production there is down sides
Coleg55Solar and wind is kinda shit tbh. Without proper maintenance they just get sent to a landfill when they break. Nuclear energy is the future
hud4raptorscoming from bc, where pretty much all our power is hydro, u'd be amazed at the irreparable damage done to rivers that hydro power does, but its kinda the best option
ThaLoraxEverybody except Texas maintains their solar and wind. Nuclear may be a great transition fuel, but it definitely isn't the sole answer for "the future " and you can get large community solar/wind project's up beforethe plans for a nuclear plant even get approved. Both those lines of arguments are misleading.
BuckleysThere is a way
DolansLebensraumUltra long term outlooks would favor investing in real estate in places like breck key copper abasin bc they will have reliable winters with good, non-melting spring conditions for thousands of years.
but im pretty sure if the earth keeps warming places like mammoth or the park city area are going to become very short seasoned. Late spring conditions in March and april in park city will only get more and more blown out of the water by places like breck where the snow is almost a glacier by comparison.
Overall though there will always be places to go skiing op. Even if the avg temp of the earth is much higher than it is now.
but earth cycles thru warm and cold phases naturally. Its not just bc “muh humam poluzhun”.
and if we do warm up the earth too much we can just dump megatons of fertilizer into the oceans and let phytoplankton save our asses.
DolansLebensraumI forget is this what candide used in his audi video?
ThaLoraxEverybody except Texas maintains their solar and wind. Nuclear may be a great transition fuel, but it definitely isn't the sole answer for "the future " and you can get large community solar/wind project's up beforethe plans for a nuclear plant even get approved. Both those lines of arguments are misleading.
Coleg55https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/features/wind-power-states-us/
basically all of our wind energy is in Texas.
and nuclear is insanely efficient, it has zero emissions, and a single plant takes up a good amount of space, but can provide energy for miles. It doesn’t get effected by clouds, cold weather, anything really. It can produce for a majority of the year
SessionThe notion that the significant investment in over 28 gigawatts of energy production is simply left to rot is absurd. I’m not sure why you would even think this.
SessionThe notion that the significant investment in over 28 gigawatts of energy production is simply left to rot is absurd. I’m not sure why you would even think this.
Wind is still a smaller niche source. It is very good and efficient. It can be built quite quickly and requires a lot less regulation than something like a nuke plant. Wind generation in reserve can be brought online and react to demand much quicker than nuclear or natural gas. We will always need large base load like nuclear. And if we do it right it can generate a lot less waste than people think.
ThaLoraxWhere did I say anything remotely similar to this notion? I'm not sure why you would even think this.
AlaskaDogfartKinda hard to do when half of your country thinks it is made up by baby eating celebrities...
Session"Everybody except Texas maintains their solar and wind."
I'm not sure what you mean then.
ThaLoraxAh, gotcha.. I'm referring to Texas' deregulated energy market. That would indeed fly over someone's head if they're not familiar with it.
If you're not familiar with it, a great recent example is their deregulation being part of the reason the turbines failed in Texas during the crazy winter storm in February when Cancun Cruz literally left his constituents in the cold. Texas "chose" to be exempt from regulations that mandate proper maintenance, thus, they didn't winterize their turbine. Then the conservatives tried to blame the failed (non-winterized) turbines for the resulting loss of power, despite wind only accounting for less than 10% of Texas' energy portfolio. As far as energy production and distribution goes, the US is basically split into several sections/groups where energy is shared/transported. Being completely deregulated and run by private companies, Texas is basically the equivalent of a remote island producing its own energy.
Hope that helps provide some clarity and context!