Both skis come in 188 length which works nice for me being taller.
I was going with the revolt 104 but a deal for some canidades came up locally around me.
pros and cons of each for whoever knows would be greatly appreciated
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
anders_aI have both the revolt 104 and CT 2.0 in 2021 models they are NOT compareable at all, for such similar skis they are worlds apart
revolt 104 is mild camber, thenrockerd, medium stiff and superlight, very playfull, but stiff enough to land stuff
CT 2.0 2021 is stiff, TONS of camber, almost no early rise or rocker, and a goot what 450grams per ski heavier, also metal, its one of the stiffest twins or probably THE stiffest twintip I have ever came across. I bought a 2nd pair on sale yesterday, because I doubt they will make a ski like this again beeing this stiff, damp, heavy
anders_athere are some INSANE dealss on the revolt 104 here, like 300USD WITH our 25% tax now.
not sure the US will see them?
anders_athere are some INSANE dealss on the revolt 104 here, like 300USD WITH our 25% tax now.
not sure the US will see them?
anders_asport bittls ships intl
https://www.sport-bittl.com/en/voelkl-revolt-104-20-21::181234_1_1527.html
should be like 377USD + shipping ish at checkout, when EU VAT is removed.
BradFiAusNzCoCaI’ve bought all of my ski stuff in Europe from sport Bittl. They literally will undercut their competitors by 1€ (lol) but then you add in free shipping and it’s a no brainer. I can’t say enough good things about sport Bittl.
Edit to say they use UPS and their shipping is really good. Plus, they list all shipping prices on their website by country.
**This post was edited on Mar 5th 2021 at 6:25:32pm
anders_aI have both the revolt 104 and CT 2.0 in 2021 models they are NOT compareable at all, for such similar skis they are worlds apart
revolt 104 is mild camber, thenrockerd, medium stiff and superlight, very playfull, but stiff enough to land stuff
CT 2.0 2021 is stiff, TONS of camber, almost no early rise or rocker, and a goot what 450grams per ski heavier, also metal, its one of the stiffest twins or probably THE stiffest twintip I have ever came across. I bought a 2nd pair on sale yesterday, because I doubt they will make a ski like this again beeing this stiff, damp, heavy
DarcA bit of a thread jacking but i have the old 2.0 and got a new 2021 2.0 as a warranty. I'm keen to keep the old 2 setup as a soft/rock ski till it dies 100%. I was looking for something that holds edge a bit better than the old 2.0. What's your thoughts on the new 2.0 carving wise, sounds like it should be pretty stable with the camber and stiffness? Keen for something to lay some turns/hold an edge well and charge around in NZ since its usually rather firm everywhere. (i wouldn't detune the new pair)
anders_aI have both the revolt 104 and CT 2.0 in 2021 models they are NOT compareable at all, for such similar skis they are worlds apart
revolt 104 is mild camber, thenrockerd, medium stiff and superlight, very playfull, but stiff enough to land stuff
CT 2.0 2021 is stiff, TONS of camber, almost no early rise or rocker, and a goot what 450grams per ski heavier, also metal, its one of the stiffest twins or probably THE stiffest twintip I have ever came across. I bought a 2nd pair on sale yesterday, because I doubt they will make a ski like this again beeing this stiff, damp, heavy
mc36000Are we talking about the same Candides here? While still relatively stiff underfoot, this ski absolutely does not have metal in it, and the last word I would use to describe them is damp. I have a pair of 186cm 3.0s from two years ago, and I would describe them as springy and playful, but get easily tossed around by any sort of bumps or chop. Relative to dedicated park skis, this ski is harder to butter and probably a little heavy, but in my mind the added pop and stable landing platform outweigh the downsides.
Remember, Candide doesn't swerve around the park at low speeds.
mc36000Are we talking about the same Candides here? While still relatively stiff underfoot, this ski absolutely does not have metal in it, and the last word I would use to describe them is damp. I have a pair of 186cm 3.0s from two years ago, and I would describe them as springy and playful, but get easily tossed around by any sort of bumps or chop. Relative to dedicated park skis, this ski is harder to butter and probably a little heavy, but in my mind the added pop and stable landing platform outweigh the downsides.
Remember, Candide doesn't swerve around the park at low speeds.
DarcA bit of a thread jacking but i have the old 2.0 and got a new 2021 2.0 as a warranty. I'm keen to keep the old 2 setup as a soft/rock ski till it dies 100%. I was looking for something that holds edge a bit better than the old 2.0. What's your thoughts on the new 2.0 carving wise, sounds like it should be pretty stable with the camber and stiffness? Keen for something to lay some turns/hold an edge well and charge around in NZ since its usually rather firm everywhere. (i wouldn't detune the new pair)