It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
qazwsxedc34I think the real problem in America and US corp land is the lack of creativity, nepotism and human greed. All citizens are the bond holders of US corp.; we took the brunt of the banks speculations and failures. We are not rewarded our fair share in US corp. land.
Libertardians claim, "don't tread on me..." and "I ain't not want to pay taxes..." Many elitists are self-admited libertardians and ofshore their accounts in tax havens. These are the real scumbags of the US as are chain corporatioms. Why?
First, the libertardians don't realize that being a citizen or PERSON (corporation) in a limited liability capacity under US corp jurisdiction is TOTALLY VOLUNTARY. Meaning you do not actually have to participate in contributing to the fictional US corporation. Taxes are VOLUNTARY; just don't screw people over or threaten anyone with violence.
What comes with renouncing this voluntary contract? Well you could not have healthcare, no bank, no credit union, etc., you'd have to homeschool your children and the fire department totally wouldn't put out your house fire if you were not under US or state corp jurisdiction. I'm sure they would but there was a hilarious story awhile back of a man whose entire house burnt down and the town corp. refused to put it out because he had no state or federal privilages whatsoever. He never had to pay a dime in tax either.
Libertarians are under the assumptiom that the state is very bad and we should just ha e private corporations and private interests take-over the country, not realiz
Im pretty sure the us government wont let you just annex your houses property. I think there was a family guy episode about that.
also, for alot of things gov provides, privatizing would work very well. Take for example the public transit system. Busdrivers that are paid for by the government make 100k to 150k a year plus benefits. If you think a private entity couldnt be created to replace that cancer with a streamlined bus service that worked just as well as before OR BETTER, and for way less money, then what the fuck are we talking about?
Im not saying that government isnt good for certain things like trash collecting and sewage treatment, but theres no reason to think that it couldnt get easily privatized.
you can always penalize ppl for trying to cheat the system.
for example, if some asshole says they produce no waste and so they dont have to pay the small fee for the privatized trash and sewage service, then if their neighbors find that they are just throwing their garbage and their piss and shit into their backyard and its stinking up the neighborhood, then there should be fines given to these assholes who try to beat the system by not paying for the privatized services. Yeah you could use government to impose those fines, but the point is, its not that hard to make a privatized system work just as well as a public government system. And the government is paying busdrivers in the us 150k a yr plus benefits, its clear that government has become a cancer. A busdriver in india makes less than 1$ per day.
so you want to say that even though an indian busdriver makes under 1$ per day, we cant pay busdrivers in the US less than 500$ per day otherwise it wont work? Why, because of unions? Fuck the unions. We have a limitless supply of mexicans anyways who would be more than happy to split the difference if not quarter it.
America is all about cancerous government recruiting its own capillary beds to feed itself while it bleeds the rest of the bodies organs dry, the organs being the otherwise healthy and productive privatized sector.
paying ppl more than they deserve is a surefire way to murder your countries hegemony in the long term.
DolansLebensraumIm pretty sure the us government wont let you just annex your houses property. I think there was a family guy episode about that.
also, for alot of things gov provides, privatizing would work very well. Take for example the public transit system. Busdrivers that are paid for by the government make 100k to 150k a year plus benefits. If you think a private entity couldnt be created to replace that cancer with a streamlined bus service that worked just as well as before OR BETTER, and for way less money, then what the fuck are we talking about?
Im not saying that government isnt good for certain things like trash collecting and sewage treatment, but theres no reason to think that it couldnt get easily privatized.
you can always penalize ppl for trying to cheat the system.
for example, if some asshole says they produce no waste and so they dont have to pay the small fee for the privatized trash and sewage service, then if their neighbors find that they are just throwing their garbage and their piss and shit into their backyard and its stinking up the neighborhood, then there should be fines given to these assholes who try to beat the system by not paying for the privatized services. Yeah you could use government to impose those fines, but the point is, its not that hard to make a privatized system work just as well as a public government system. And the government is paying busdrivers in the us 150k a yr plus benefits, its clear that government has become a cancer. A busdriver in india makes less than 1$ per day.
so you want to say that even though an indian busdriver makes under 1$ per day, we cant pay busdrivers in the US less than 500$ per day otherwise it wont work? Why, because of unions? Fuck the unions. We have a limitless supply of mexicans anyways who would be more than happy to split the difference if not quarter it.
America is all about cancerous government recruiting its own capillary beds to feed itself while it bleeds the rest of the bodies organs dry, the organs being the otherwise healthy and productive privatized sector.
paying ppl more than they deserve is a surefire way to murder your countries hegemony in the long term.
Humans have done it through relinquishing all state and federal privileges, contracts and debt; that means all! The law is the law and taxes for this reason are and will always be voluntary, especially income tax which is explained in the tax code BUT one would have to relinquish their personhood and limited liability membership within the jurisdiction of the United States corporation which is a 12 mile square in the District of Columbia. (I know this sounds ridiculous but it is not, read Puffendorf—not a Harry Potter character ; Mandeville, Hobbes, Malthus, Coke and especially Thomas Daniel Cushing.)
Basically, you wouldn't be able to have any insurance, healthcare; no bank or credit card, etc. How much are you willing to give up will determine if and how you can do it. Above, I was referring more to the billionaire scum that whine about taxes offshoring their accounts in tax free havens (in so stealing from those who willingly contracted with US corp for privileges/welfare of what ever kind, such as food stamps for farmers) whilst still holding state and federal privileges. Such should and is theoretically illegal for the small guy but less so for the rich guy.
>>>And the government is paying busdrivers in the us 150k a yr plus benefits, its clear that government has become a cancer. A busdriver in india makes less than 1$ per day.
That salary is not relevant to the US. India is one of the poorest and most corrupt countries in the world. 90% of the population works in the informal sector and the small middle class under the caste system give two shits about the poor. I'm actually fine with bus drivers making that much money because I know contractually that is possible or should be because the US corp was chartered as a indefinitely self-funding quasi public/private corporation; where we, unfortunately, year by year, lose our ability to utilise said corporation to regulate that same corporation and other private corporations that might destroy our freedom or steal our labor through what will surely come next: bail-ins.
>>>so you want to say that even though an indian busdriver makes under 1$ per day, we cant pay busdrivers in the US less than 500$ per day otherwise it wont work? Why, because of unions? Fuck the unions. We have a limitless supply of mexicans anyways who would be more than happy to split the difference if not quarter it.
You're not understanding what the US corporation was chartered to be. Why congress incorporated chartered a for-profit corporation with the backing of US corp is beyond me but yes... unions... when they are not corrupt and work the right way... are a great tool to ROTECT your labor. Why do you think amazon and big multi-national corporations are fervently anti-union? Now, that isn't to say unions can not be corrupt to all hell. The minimum wage adjusted for inflation compared to 80 years ago should be around 50 dollars an hour when you take into account education, medicine, housing, etc. My grandmother back in the 50's was making thousands of dollars at a low-tier job at a bank that today theoretically she would have been making 104,000 dollars but instead that same job one makes around 45-50 thousand.
It's honestly sort of spooky how the middle class never wants to mention corporations nor hold billionaires accountable but always puts down the poor and struggling. And I do agree that the private sector could do better what the government tries to do but that isn't always the case. But again, we can utilise government; unfortunately private corporations are merely about making profit at the expense of everything else, although not always.
>>>America is all about cancerous government recruiting its own capillary beds to feed itself while it bleeds the rest of the bodies organs dry, the organs being the otherwise healthy and productive privatized sector.
America = the land and those who live on it. Do you hate the American people? Or are you referring to US corp? Or the billionaire class? The privatised sector regularly gets bailed out by the government of which it has hijacked US corp almost in its entirety.
>>>paying ppl more than they deserve is a surefire way to murder your countries hegemony in the long term.
I think EVERYONE who makes under 80K no matter the job deserves a lot more if they are labouring tirelessly especially when we adjust everything for inflation and include housing, education, medicine, etc. The US could simply print the money free of interest as long as that money goes into productive projects like building safe housing for the poor, etc. Getting people back on their feet.
qazwsxedc34Humans have done it through relinquishing all state and federal privileges, contracts and debt; that means all! The law is the law and taxes for this reason are and will always be voluntary, especially income tax which is explained in the tax code BUT one would have to relinquish their personhood and limited liability membership within the jurisdiction of the United States corporation which is a 12 mile square in the District of Columbia. (I know this sounds ridiculous but it is not, read Puffendorf—not a Harry Potter character ; Mandeville, Hobbes, Malthus, Coke and especially Thomas Daniel Cushing.)
Can you please expand upon this notion further. The voluntary income tax part specifically.
qazwsxedc34I think the real problem in America and US corp land is the lack of creativity, nepotism and human greed. All citizens are the bond holders of US corp.; we took the brunt of the banks speculations and failures. We are not rewarded our fair share in US corp. land.
Libertardians claim, "don't tread on me..." and "I ain't not want to pay taxes..." Many elitists are self-admited libertardians and ofshore their accounts in tax havens. These are the real scumbags of the US as are chain corporatioms. Why?
First, the libertardians don't realize that being a citizen or PERSON (corporation) in a limited liability capacity under US corp jurisdiction is TOTALLY VOLUNTARY. Meaning you do not actually have to participate in contributing to the fictional US corporation. Taxes are VOLUNTARY; just don't screw people over or threaten anyone with violence.
What comes with renouncing this voluntary contract? Well you could not have healthcare, no bank, no credit union, etc., you'd have to homeschool your children and the fire department totally wouldn't put out your house fire if you were not under US or state corp jurisdiction. I'm sure they would but there was a hilarious story awhile back of a man whose entire house burnt down and the town corp. refused to put it out because he had no state or federal privilages whatsoever. He never had to pay a dime in tax either.
Libertarians are under the assumptiom that the state is very bad and we should just ha e private corporations and private interests take-over the country, not realiz
Good luck not paying taxes fam with that sovierign citizen bullshiit
Not surprised an antivaxer is crazy about other shit too
qazwsxedc34Humans have done it through relinquishing all state and federal privileges, contracts and debt; that means all! The law is the law and taxes for this reason are and will always be voluntary, especially income tax which is explained in the tax code BUT one would have to relinquish their personhood and limited liability membership within the jurisdiction of the United States corporation which is a 12 mile square in the District of Columbia. (I know this sounds ridiculous but it is not, read Puffendorf—not a Harry Potter character ; Mandeville, Hobbes, Malthus, Coke and especially Thomas Daniel Cushing.)
Basically, you wouldn't be able to have any insurance, healthcare; no bank or credit card, etc. How much are you willing to give up will determine if and how you can do it. Above, I was referring more to the billionaire scum that whine about taxes offshoring their accounts in tax free havens (in so stealing from those who willingly contracted with US corp for privileges/welfare of what ever kind, such as food stamps for farmers) whilst still holding state and federal privileges. Such should and is theoretically illegal for the small guy but less so for the rich guy.
>>>And the government is paying busdrivers in the us 150k a yr plus benefits, its clear that government has become a cancer. A busdriver in india makes less than 1$ per day.
That salary is not relevant to the US. India is one of the poorest and most corrupt countries in the world. 90% of the population works in the informal sector and the small middle class under the caste system give two shits about the poor. I'm actually fine with bus drivers making that much money because I know contractually that is possible or should be because the US corp was chartered as a indefinitely self-funding quasi public/private corporation; where we, unfortunately, year by year, lose our ability to utilise said corporation to regulate that same corporation and other private corporations that might destroy our freedom or steal our labor through what will surely come next: bail-ins.
>>>so you want to say that even though an indian busdriver makes under 1$ per day, we cant pay busdrivers in the US less than 500$ per day otherwise it wont work? Why, because of unions? Fuck the unions. We have a limitless supply of mexicans anyways who would be more than happy to split the difference if not quarter it.
You're not understanding what the US corporation was chartered to be. Why congress incorporated chartered a for-profit corporation with the backing of US corp is beyond me but yes... unions... when they are not corrupt and work the right way... are a great tool to ROTECT your labor. Why do you think amazon and big multi-national corporations are fervently anti-union? Now, that isn't to say unions can not be corrupt to all hell. The minimum wage adjusted for inflation compared to 80 years ago should be around 50 dollars an hour when you take into account education, medicine, housing, etc. My grandmother back in the 50's was making thousands of dollars at a low-tier job at a bank that today theoretically she would have been making 104,000 dollars but instead that same job one makes around 45-50 thousand.
It's honestly sort of spooky how the middle class never wants to mention corporations nor hold billionaires accountable but always puts down the poor and struggling. And I do agree that the private sector could do better what the government tries to do but that isn't always the case. But again, we can utilise government; unfortunately private corporations are merely about making profit at the expense of everything else, although not always.
>>>America is all about cancerous government recruiting its own capillary beds to feed itself while it bleeds the rest of the bodies organs dry, the organs being the otherwise healthy and productive privatized sector.
America = the land and those who live on it. Do you hate the American people? Or are you referring to US corp? Or the billionaire class? The privatised sector regularly gets bailed out by the government of which it has hijacked US corp almost in its entirety.
>>>paying ppl more than they deserve is a surefire way to murder your countries hegemony in the long term.
I think EVERYONE who makes under 80K no matter the job deserves a lot more if they are labouring tirelessly especially when we adjust everything for inflation and include housing, education, medicine, etc. The US could simply print the money free of interest as long as that money goes into productive projects like building safe housing for the poor, etc. Getting people back on their feet.
I just cant stand the idea of ppl being paid more than they deserve bc it is in the end coming from the pockets of poorer people who shouldnt have to give up their money to people who make more money for doing less. Look at how hard a nurse works in a busy hospital. You think a nurse should make 30-40$ an hour busting their ass and have their taxes go towards paying a busdriver or MVA gov employee 75$ an hour?
Its bullshit. Gov is absolutely a cancer, and just like businesses that dont cut the fat and remove the cancer, countries that become loaded with cancer will eventually be passed by places that are bigger magnets for money and intellectual resources. Switzerland literally charges 2 million to ppl who want to buy swiss citizenship.
you think anybody with an iq over 40 and knowledge of where the united states is headed would pay 2 million dollars for US citizenship?
Also the indian wages of a busdriver making 1$ per day is orders of magnitude closer to paying ppl what they actually deserve in a marketplace of many capable busdrivers. Its just in america that we keep promising everybody everybody elses lunch, so nobody bothers to pack their own lunch and the system collapses.
zuesCan you please expand upon this notion further. The voluntary income tax part specifically.
No need... if you are a member of Us corp in a limited liability capacity or recieve federal or state benefits, privilages, welfare—whatever kind—hidden to you, tacitly agreed upon, etc., them you are obligated to pay taxes.
Relinquishing all of these contracts, including the tacit contracts that one may not know he/she even made with the state and federal government theoretically will get you off the hook of paying taxes. Good luck because it is a rugged world out there, might have to become amish and don't touch your foot on a state built road.
My example was only to explain the rich scumbags who retain such privilages, complain about taxes or offshore their money to tax havens, which steals from those who voluntarily contracted with US corp to receive privilages, benefits and welfare.
NotaskibumGood luck not paying taxes fam with that sovierign citizen bullshiit
Not surprised an antivaxer is crazy about other shit too
Are you a retard? You must be a retard. Where did I claim that I as a member of US corp wouldn't pay my taxes? Only scumbag corporations and Libertardians do that whilst retaining Us corp privilages and benefits.
Also, your sovereign citizen term is an oxymoron that you probably don't even understand. You cannot be soverign and a citizen. And you cannot be a citizen or a soverign. I know the law, I just want the corporation to work better for the struggling and poor folk.
Also, I'm not anti-vax, I'm pro-safe vax and pro-corporate liability. Fuck off, ignoramus. Go spew your corporate public relation terms somewhere else.
DolansLebensraumI just cant stand the idea of ppl being paid more than they deserve bc it is in the end coming from the pockets of poorer people who shouldnt have to give up their money to people who make more money for doing less. Look at how hard a nurse works in a busy hospital. You think a nurse should make 30-40$ an hour busting their ass and have their taxes go towards paying a busdriver or MVA gov employee 75$ an hour?
Its bullshit. Gov is absolutely a cancer, and just like businesses that dont cut the fat and remove the cancer, countries that become loaded with cancer will eventually be passed by places that are bigger magnets for money and intellectual resources. Switzerland literally charges 2 million to ppl who want to buy swiss citizenship.
you think anybody with an iq over 40 and knowledge of where the united states is headed would pay 2 million dollars for US citizenship?
Also the indian wages of a busdriver making 1$ per day is orders of magnitude closer to paying ppl what they actually deserve in a marketplace of many capable busdrivers. Its just in america that we keep promising everybody everybody elses lunch, so nobody bothers to pack their own lunch and the system collapses.
i kind of like that analogy.
regard,
uncel doland
Here is a little diatribe for you to ponder concerning the left (I'll do the right later):
Smart disabled poor person who has restricted ability to work a job he could before, "let me just put that $1000 I’ve managed to save up over the last year towards my $8000 per month medical bills."
Margaret Sanger:
"Don't let word get out that we want to exterminate the negro." And, "disabled and weak or sick people with spirochetosis and Syphilis should be sterilised secretly."
Israel:
"Margaret Sanger was a lovely Yiddish women who started Planned Parenthood for the betterment of the "women's right movement"
Eugenics 101
Now:
Blacks aborting their babies like no tomorrow... Margaret Sanger proud. Democrats proud.
Pro-abortion SJW's:
"Sanger was a wonderful women and very smart... also, my idol is Madeline Albright."
Okay, now back to the greedy republitards, would you proclaim that very specific public corporations operating under a constitutional charter such as USPS are NOT essential, but the service is??
WOULD YOU want that performed by a private corporation WITHOUT a constituional convention/amendment? Just asking.
>>>just cant stand the idea of ppl being paid more than they deserve bc it is in the end coming from the pockets of poorer people who shouldnt have to give up their money to people who make more money for doing less.
It's the rich who should give up their money, especially if they are offshoring accounts in tax havens; or better, use self-funding US corp to print UBI to get the poor back on their feet. What determines what people deserve? I'm under the opinion that a home, running water and property ownership is a right. That sounds radical, I know, but in the end I think it will significantly help our economy. You'd be surprised to learn that back in the Catholic days of rule, work hours, despite poor hygiene, though I take one shower every 6 months, so I can't complain, was far less than what it is today.
>>>Look at how hard a nurse works in a busy hospital. You think a nurse should make 30-40$ an hour busting their ass and have their taxes go towards paying a busdriver or MVA gov employee 75$ an hour?
Yes, because US corp is self-funding and if they stop corporations from mooching and offshoring their accounts to tax free havens or starting colony company wars be dual-Israeli neocons. Sure, a bus driver should earn about that and a nurse should earn more.
>>>Its bullshit. Gov is absolutely a cancer, and just like businesses that dont cut the fat and remove the cancer, countries that become loaded with cancer will eventually be passed by places that are bigger magnets for money and intellectual resources. Switzerland literally charges 2 million to ppl who want to buy swiss citizenship.
US corp was here before you were born and will be here after. And if a revolution comes, it will just name change. Government implies the branches (and its members) of US corp that you and I should be able to theoretically utilise for the COMMON GOOD. Today, it is for the who has the most money and private corporations/contracts. When US corp allows PsyWar and BlackCube to work on US soil, you might want to ask, "who is controlling US corp?"
>>>Also the indian wages of a busdriver making 1$ per day is orders of magnitude closer to paying ppl what they actually deserve in a marketplace of many capable busdrivers.
What's this obsession with India you have? Fuck them. I don't live there. Do you want more of a corporate grifting economy than we already have?
>>>Its just in america that we keep promising everybody everybody elses lunch, so nobody bothers to pack their own lunch and the system collapses.
No, it was written in the constitution that the US corp would provide welfare for all citizens. Who gets the free lunch is CORPORATIONS and Nepotistic billionaire grifters; oh, can't forget Israel banker colony welfare state either. Now, if you have a problem with these statements then maybe you are anti-American?
Love, Auntie; please return to Delhi, I miss you dear.
qazwsxedc34Are you a retard? You must be a retard. Where did I claim that I as a member of US corp wouldn't pay my taxes? Only scumbag corporations and Libertardians do that whilst retaining Us corp privilages and benefits.
Also, your sovereign citizen term is an oxymoron that you probably don't even understand. You cannot be soverign and a citizen. And you cannot be a citizen or a soverign. I know the law, I just want the corporation to work better for the struggling and poor folk.
Also, I'm not anti-vax, I'm pro-safe vax and pro-corporate liability. Fuck off, ignoramus. Go spew your corporate public relation terms somewhere else.
ah yes, calling people slurs to make yourself feel better.
Notaskibumah yes, calling people slurs to make yourself feel better.
what vaccines are you pro then?
Any vaccine that is safe and effective and uses accurate diagnostics in phase trials and investigates possible later malignancies in long-term trials. However, I'm a weary because of the profit motive, the lack of liability, and the utter stupidity of Lymerix, which was passedd off as a real vaccine when it was a fake endotoxic Pam3cys structured vaccine used to make people seronegative to pass it through phase trials; they also falsified their diagnostics as well.
**This post was edited on Apr 20th 2021 at 8:53:12pm
qazwsxedc34Any vaccine that is safe and effective and uses accurate diagnostics in phase trials and investigates possible later malignancies in long-term trials. However, I'm a weary because of the profit motive, the lack of liability, and the utter stupidity of Lymerix, which was passedd off as a real vaccine when it was a fake endotoxic Pam3cys structured vaccine used to make people seronegative to pass it through phase trials; they also falsified their diagnostics as well.
**This post was edited on Apr 20th 2021 at 8:53:12pm
I gave you my backgroud on why I do not trust for-profit incentives for vaccine companeis with no liability. I"m not pro-vax and I'm not anti-vax; sure, if the Measles vaccine is a true and tried vaccine with years upon years of evidence to back its efficacy, then yes, I believe that it is effective but again, we also have Lymerix which they are again trying to push and I know all about the vaccine from its structure to how the scumbags falsified the diagnostics to pass it through phase trials, etc., for that reason I don't believe in the pro-vax, anti-vax false dichotomy.
qazwsxedc34I gave you my backgroud on why I do not trust for-profit incentives for vaccine companeis with no liability. I"m not pro-vax and I'm not anti-vax; sure, if the Measles vaccine is a true and tried vaccine with years upon years of evidence to back its efficacy, then yes, I believe that it is effective but again, we also have Lymerix which they are again trying to push and I know all about the vaccine from its structure to how the scumbags falsified the diagnostics to pass it through phase trials, etc., for that reason I don't believe in the pro-vax, anti-vax false dichotomy.
I can agree. Most vaccines take years and years of research to actually be rolled out. The fact that this vaccine was done in only a half year or so should be a red flag for people who don't truly need it.
altho my advice to u, if you’re in it sell for something else like BTC/Eth. People always get so wound up over thinking how high it could go with zero evidence to support their thought they forget they have a much better chance they have selling and catching another big pump elsewhere. Watch the whales pull the rug as they sell Doge for BTC or whatever shitcoin pump they can manipulate you into.
it’s a very manipulated market, dont forget. So stay smart and grounded
qazwsxedc34Humans have done it through relinquishing all state and federal privileges, contracts and debt; that means all! The law is the law and taxes for this reason are and will always be voluntary, especially income tax which is explained in the tax code BUT one would have to relinquish their personhood and limited liability membership within the jurisdiction of the United States corporation which is a 12 mile square in the District of Columbia. (I know this sounds ridiculous but it is not, read Puffendorf—not a Harry Potter character ; Mandeville, Hobbes, Malthus, Coke and especially Thomas Daniel Cushing.)
Basically, you wouldn't be able to have any insurance, healthcare; no bank or credit card, etc. How much are you willing to give up will determine if and how you can do it. Above, I was referring more to the billionaire scum that whine about taxes offshoring their accounts in tax free havens (in so stealing from those who willingly contracted with US corp for privileges/welfare of what ever kind, such as food stamps for farmers) whilst still holding state and federal privileges. Such should and is theoretically illegal for the small guy but less so for the rich guy.
>>>And the government is paying busdrivers in the us 150k a yr plus benefits, its clear that government has become a cancer. A busdriver in india makes less than 1$ per day.
That salary is not relevant to the US. India is one of the poorest and most corrupt countries in the world. 90% of the population works in the informal sector and the small middle class under the caste system give two shits about the poor. I'm actually fine with bus drivers making that much money because I know contractually that is possible or should be because the US corp was chartered as a indefinitely self-funding quasi public/private corporation; where we, unfortunately, year by year, lose our ability to utilise said corporation to regulate that same corporation and other private corporations that might destroy our freedom or steal our labor through what will surely come next: bail-ins.
>>>so you want to say that even though an indian busdriver makes under 1$ per day, we cant pay busdrivers in the US less than 500$ per day otherwise it wont work? Why, because of unions? Fuck the unions. We have a limitless supply of mexicans anyways who would be more than happy to split the difference if not quarter it.
You're not understanding what the US corporation was chartered to be. Why congress incorporated chartered a for-profit corporation with the backing of US corp is beyond me but yes... unions... when they are not corrupt and work the right way... are a great tool to ROTECT your labor. Why do you think amazon and big multi-national corporations are fervently anti-union? Now, that isn't to say unions can not be corrupt to all hell. The minimum wage adjusted for inflation compared to 80 years ago should be around 50 dollars an hour when you take into account education, medicine, housing, etc. My grandmother back in the 50's was making thousands of dollars at a low-tier job at a bank that today theoretically she would have been making 104,000 dollars but instead that same job one makes around 45-50 thousand.
It's honestly sort of spooky how the middle class never wants to mention corporations nor hold billionaires accountable but always puts down the poor and struggling. And I do agree that the private sector could do better what the government tries to do but that isn't always the case. But again, we can utilise government; unfortunately private corporations are merely about making profit at the expense of everything else, although not always.
>>>America is all about cancerous government recruiting its own capillary beds to feed itself while it bleeds the rest of the bodies organs dry, the organs being the otherwise healthy and productive privatized sector.
America = the land and those who live on it. Do you hate the American people? Or are you referring to US corp? Or the billionaire class? The privatised sector regularly gets bailed out by the government of which it has hijacked US corp almost in its entirety.
>>>paying ppl more than they deserve is a surefire way to murder your countries hegemony in the long term.
I think EVERYONE who makes under 80K no matter the job deserves a lot more if they are labouring tirelessly especially when we adjust everything for inflation and include housing, education, medicine, etc. The US could simply print the money free of interest as long as that money goes into productive projects like building safe housing for the poor, etc. Getting people back on their feet.
I think if you make 10 million dollars and pay 5 million of it in income taxes you should be able to do what you want with your 5 mil. Even move it to switzerland or the cayman islands.
also i look at the system from an austrian economics point of view.
imo worldwide macroeconomics is just microeconomics applied to herd psychology and herd ignorance.
Sort of like the same idea why some ppl dont vote bc they say to themselves (if i dont vote its not going to make any difference on who wins, bc im just 1 person).
So even if everybody realizes that if they all went to the bank to get their money either in cash or gold form, the banks would blow up after the first 5% of the population made their run. But ppl say to themselves (who cares if the bank doesnt have my money, it wont matter unless EVERYBODY makes a run on the bank).
Your viewpoint is interesting but i feel like if the system isnt stable at the core microeconomic level then it is vulnerable to certain things that most ppl just assume will never happen.
