Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
ethanshredzSkiing the 117 as a daily driver in Fernie right now. I love them as a chargy freeride ski that's still easy in the air and fairly playful for how stiff it is. Because of the low weight, you definitely have to be very deliberate and aggressive when skiing chop and variable, but the ski certainly has the stiffness to allow you to push it hard in these conditions. I've skied the 105 as well, and all of the same applies, with the 105 feeling a bit softer and (obviously) narrower. Feel free to give me a shout if you have any other questions!
The referenced post has been removed.
ethanshredzSkiing the 117 as a daily driver in Fernie right now. I love them as a chargy freeride ski that's still easy in the air and fairly playful for how stiff it is. Because of the low weight, you definitely have to be very deliberate and aggressive when skiing chop and variable, but the ski certainly has the stiffness to allow you to push it hard in these conditions. I've skied the 105 as well, and all of the same applies, with the 105 feeling a bit softer and (obviously) narrower. Feel free to give me a shout if you have any other questions!
dutch71I appreciate your feedback. Is the 105 in your mind able to cut me a slack as well? Meaning as years go by I charge less and appreciate a softer style.
And is it so the 105 doesn’t have a top sheet and the top layer gets ruined quickly?
The referenced post has been removed.
ethanshredzAs for the durability concerns, I haven't really noticed any severe issues with the polyester topsheet, but like any other ski, they'll get scraped and chipped up if you tend to ski with your feet close together. It's worth noting that next year's Kore gets a more aggressively chamfered topsheet shape, to supposedly improve durability of the topsheet and sidewall.