Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
anders_amagnus 102 is sould out it seems :(
AdtmartensIs it strictly for park use? If so i would probably say frankenski just because it’s symmetrical and will have a true centre mount. If you are going to use them for all mtn at all i would probably lean towards mangus. Frankneski sounds so sick and definitely my dream park ski so i would go for it.
Railslayer69Currently on the frankenski and damn they are probably my favorite skis. Playful, buttery but not super buttery, and hella light weight. I’ve had the magnus 102 and they are much stiffer than people make them look you really gotta use your body to move them around if your going with magnus I would go with the magnus 90 or whatever the smaller one is.
timdrachanI would say about 70/30 park / all mountain, and I live out east and spend a lot of my days at Tremblant, the iciest hill I have ever skied at
AdtmartensIs it strictly for park use? If so i would probably say frankenski just because it’s symmetrical and will have a true centre mount. If you are going to use them for all mtn at all i would probably lean towards mangus. Frankneski sounds so sick and definitely my dream park ski so i would go for it.
LonelyHad the frankenskis. Loved them. Tough ass skis. They may finally be retired this season after 4 years.
sams154 years damn, how they lookin?
timdrachanI would say about 70/30 park / all mountain, and I live out east and spend a lot of my days at Tremblant, the iciest hill I have ever skied at
BradFiAusNzCoCaTremblant was the only place I’ve ever had to stop skiing mid day and thaw my toes out in the lodge... and I’ve been skiing in Finland this season so that’s saying something
SessionLaughs in "heated socks".