patagonialukeWhat length were you on for the previous ARV 106? I assume the 188, but if you were on the 180, the J Skis Vacation might be worth a look. If you were on the 188 ARV 106, the 186 Vacation would probably be too soft.
SFB and Reckoner 102 are very soft and probably wouldn't be supportive enough for you. The Reckoner 112 feels notably stronger to me than the 102, so there's a chance that might work, but I also think it'd be a bit less stable, and I never got to spend much time on the regular ARV 106 so I'm not super confident there.
@Twig did you get to try the 20/21 Prodigy 3.0? Sounds like, with its new, softer flex, that might be one of the closer replacements for the softer 19/20 ARV 106?
The Jeffreys are very stiff compared to most options in this class, but as noted above, their dramatic rocker line still lets you butter them, it's just a different technique; leveraging the rocker profile more than flexing the ski a ton. While they're not easy to bend with little input, the upside is that they can really launch you out of a butter with a ton of pop once you really lay into them.
And all that said, from what I remember, the 20/21 ARV 106 is not dramatically stiffer than the last version. So if you liked everything else about the ski, I'd say the new version is still one of your safer bets since any other ski is gonna be different in terms of rocker profile, sidecut, weight, etc.
Chimpster37i was basing the decision on the new ARV solely off @Twig (I thinks?) rooftop review that said he couldn’t take them in the park anymore. Wondering if that’s more due to how they ride rails or jumps. Also not sure how heavy twig is and if that would affect butter ability on them. pretty sure I’m a fair bit heavier and want to ride the 180s similar to what was reviewed. If they are solid on jumps and I can butter them I don’t care if they are shit on rails.
one thing I didn’t mention and probably should have: I can get a deal on arvs that make them much cheaper compared to other skis mentioned here. I just didn’t know if it was a good idea getting them because I’ve valued the rooftop reviews and that said you can’t take them in the park and doing the 2 jumps at Seymour is the main thing I care about tbh
**This post was edited on Aug 13th 2020 at 1:06:15pm
OhJayKeep in mind @Twig is shorter and lighter than you, so I'd imagine stiffening up the skis might be more noticeable for him. I think it may also help to know what gen ARV 106s you have? Each gen has gotten stiffer than the last, so if you're going from gen 1 (16/17-17/18) to 20/21, then I imagine the added stiffness will be pretty noticeable.
Late to the party here because I wanted to have time to write a full reply! Interestingly, and this is rare, I have a slightly different take to Luke on the comparative flexes here. But first off, I am called Twig for a reason. I'm about 135-140lbs depending on the ratio of skiing/climbing to eating/NS-ing that I've been doing. I found the new 2021 ARV significantly stiffer than the previous ski. I wouldn't go as far as to say I couldn't take them in the park any more at all. But I ski with a fairly loose, playful style when I'm skiing park and for that, I found the ARV too stiff. They were ok on jumps, I found them a bit dead on takeoffs but they worked, and the stiffness on landings was nice too. I would put them close to the Jeffrey 108 in terms of flex, but with much less rocker.
I was initially surprised to hear Luke throw the J Vacation in the mix, I would say that the 180 length of those is by far the softest of all the skis mentioned, maybe even softer than the Blend, but then I figured he was saying that if you ride the 180 ARV, the 186 Vacation might work stability wise, which makes more sense. I find them a bit long/heavy but then, I'm very light. I think the new Prodigy 3.0 is pretty close in terms of flex to the older ARVs. I'd say it's a touch softer than the 2nd edition ARV 106 (and thus noticeably softer than the older prodigy 3.0 and the newest ARV 106). However, I would say the Reckoners also fit in a similar bracket flex wise. The 102 is a touch softer again, probably around the flex of the OG 106, but the 112 is more like the 2nd edition 106. That is probably not that easy to read, so I'm going to attempt a comparative 'feel' list in terms of how stable vs buttery a ski feels to me with the skis mentioned, factoring in both flex and rocker profile (butteriest to most stable)
J Skis Vacation (180cm)
Line Blend
Line Sir Francis Bacon (latest edition)
ARV 106 (OG edition, 180cm)
K2 Reckoner 102 (very similar flex to the OG ARV IMO, tail feels a touch softer, nose feels a touch stiffer. Sidebar: one of my favorite skis of recent years)
Faction Prodigy 3.0 (new edition, 184cm)
ARV 106 (2nd edition, 180cm)
K2 Reckoner 112 (184cm)
ON3P Magnus 102 (181cm, the 176 for me slots between the K2 R102 and Faction Prod 3.0s mentioned because i can get my weight out towards the tip/tail easier)
Atomic Bentchetler 100 (180cm, except the shovel, which is pretty soft)
ON3P Jeffrey 108 (181cm)
ARV 106 (2021, newest ski, 180cm, note: the Jeffrey is slightly stiffer but has tons of rocker so it feels looser)
I would say in terms of 'closest ski' to what you have, it might well be the Prodigy 3.0. I love that ski for a bit of everything and that is exactly what I thought of the older ARVs. I've thrown in a couple more options to the mix though. First off, the Magnus 102 which is a touch narrower and with more rocker, but offers a similar 'type' of ski to the 2nd edition 106. It's a similar flex but with more rocker so ends up feeling a touch more playful.
The new ARV is very similar to the old model in regards other than flex. I did find it 'too stiff' to really like it, however, you have 70-75lbs on me, so you're going to notice added stiffness much less than me (and notice a softer ski more). So my advice would probably still be to go for the ARV 106 of the skis mentioned, especially given that you have a deal on it. The second curveball here is the Bentchetler 100, because it's also an Amer ski. I'd be interested to hear
@patagonialuke 's take on this because he has skied them more than me, but for me, they might fit your wants well. It's a more directional ski on paper, but I skied them -2.5cm from true center and found them perfectly comfortable there. A lot of the atomic team do the same, or mount even further forward, and ride them for pure park. The tail is a touch stiffer than the 2nd gen ARV 106, which is nice for stable landings on jumps and drops, but the rocker section in the nose is softer and really fun for nosebutters. I liked them more in the park than the new ARV 106. Given that you can get Amer skis significantly cheaper, one of those two would be my instinct.
**This post was edited on Sep 22nd 2020 at 1:03:07pm