John Bolton: The Room Where it Happened

T.L.He's a fraud, just like his claims. He had an opportunity to disclose anything he wanted under oath in front of congress. He declined. He said he would sue if he was subpoenaed and compelled to testify.

He wanted to save his fiction for his book deal.

T.L.He's a fraud, just like his claims. He had an opportunity to disclose anything he wanted under oath in front of congress. He declined. He said he would sue if he was subpoenaed and compelled to testify.

He wanted to save his fiction for his book deal.

T.L.He's a fraud, just like his claims. He had an opportunity to disclose anything he wanted under oath in front of congress. He declined. He said he would sue if he was subpoenaed and compelled to testify.

He wanted to save his fiction for his book deal.

CLQI seem to remember the impeachment hearing in the Senate having NO witnesses and NO evidence looked at before Trump was acquitted.

OregonDeadI got confused and I should not have clicked. I was actually hoping for Michael Bolton

carry on now

T.L.Are you serious? The transcript of the call was released with not a single mention of quid pro quo. Adam Schiff brought every member of the circus up front except the only one that mattered.. Eric Ciaramella. We still haven't heard a thing from him and you can't even say his name on social media without being censored.

CLQA non-verbatim memo isn’t a transcript you fucking idiot. You also don’t have to explicitly say quid pro quo for it to be quid pro quo. Take ur Fox News talking points and shove it up ur ass.

T.L.Whatever you personally choose to call it, it's standard procedure to record call logs they way they did. It's generally referred to as 'the transcript'. There was zero insinuation of ANY quid pro quo in the call. The burden of proof was always on the democrats to present proof to validate their accusations and they failed. Hearsay has never held up in court. Especially from a CIA/Obama implanted "whistleblower" that was outed at the very beginning of the hoax.

Your insults are about on par for your rebuttals so nothing new there.

Your aversion of getting into specifics is predictable.

You've clearly already fallen for this recent hoax. Unfortunate.

If you ever want to have a rational, level-headed conversation about current events or politics, hit me up.

T.L.Whatever you personally choose to call it, it's standard procedure to record call logs they way they did. It's generally referred to as 'the transcript'. There was zero insinuation of ANY quid pro quo in the call. The burden of proof was always on the democrats to present proof to validate their accusations and they failed. Hearsay has never held up in court. Especially from a CIA/Obama implanted "whistleblower" that was outed at the very beginning of the hoax.

Your insults are about on par for your rebuttals so nothing new there.

Your aversion of getting into specifics is predictable.

You've clearly already fallen for this recent hoax. Unfortunate.

If you ever want to have a rational, level-headed conversation about current events or politics, hit me up.

Turd__AuthorityQuite a dramatic title I'd say. This thing is getting TONS of press. Folks are posting reviews before even reading the book. Trump is freaking out. Bolton might get charged per Trump? Top of pre-sales on Amazon.

Anyone gonna read it? It sounds interesting. John Bolton isn't a model government official either. Is he lying? Exaggerating? Truth?

If it's anything like Trump's Twitter account this book is gonna be gold regardless.

T.L.If you ever want to have a rational, level-headed conversation about current events or politics, hit me up.

skiermanWell it looks like the part in Bolton's book about Ivanka conducting government business via a private email was absolutely spot on. Not only that, she was doing this as a private citizen before hired by her daddy in the WH.