It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Difference between tyrolia adrenalin and tyrolia ambition touring bindings?
DolanReloadedi cant find anything about how they differ. They both seem to be touring bindings except the toepiece of one is thicker than the others.
why would tyrolia make 2 different bindings that do the same thing?
The ambition series is a lighter weight, lower din frame touring binding while the Adrenalin is a more burly, higher din, heavier binding.
it’s all just down to how much strain you’re going to put on the gear.
If you’re lightweight, not into big cliff hucks and don’t ski aggressively the ambition is what you would pick and if you’re heavier, more aggressive, skiing faster, doing big sends the Adrenalin is what you want.
FaunaSkisThe ambition series is a lighter weight, lower din frame touring binding while the Adrenalin is a more burly, higher din, heavier binding.
it’s all just down to how much strain you’re going to put on the gear.
If you’re lightweight, not into big cliff hucks and don’t ski aggressively the ambition is what you would pick and if you’re heavier, more aggressive, skiing faster, doing big sends the Adrenalin is what you want.
That is fucking nuts. I cant imagine someone saying to themselves
“hmm binding A is stronger, more reliable, and more durable, and it weighs a tiny bit more. Fuck ima get binding B because its weaker, cheaper and a tad lighter because i ski like a pussy and dont plan to ever improve or learn to ski aggressively...”
DolanReloadedThat is fucking nuts. I cant imagine someone saying to themselves
“hmm binding A is stronger, more reliable, and more durable, and it weighs a tiny bit more. Fuck ima get binding B because its weaker, cheaper and a tad lighter because i ski like a pussy and dont plan to ever improve or learn to ski aggressively...”
is tyrolia fucking kidding?
It's not just tyrolia, look at squires, warden 11s, spx or nx 10
Everyone doesn't need a burly binding. I have shifts and attack 16s, I have none chance of breaking the attack 16s, I'd have picked up the 13s but found a deal so cheaper to get 16s. DIN 8.5-9
mystery3It's not just tyrolia, look at squires, warden 11s, spx or nx 10
Everyone doesn't need a burly binding. I have shifts and attack 16s, I have none chance of breaking the attack 16s, I'd have picked up the 13s but found a deal so cheaper to get 16s. DIN 8.5-9
Im pretty sure the attack 13 and 16 and 18 are identical except for the max din. The 11 has a less burly heel piece than the 13, 16, and 18 but other than that its just the din range.
DolanReloadedIm pretty sure the attack 13 and 16 and 18 are identical except for the max din. The 11 has a less burly heel piece than the 13, 16, and 18 but other than that its just the din range.
The 16s and 18s are all metal.
The 11s are great for beginners. 13s cover the majority of needs, 16s and 18s are burly.
CatdickBojanglesWeight is a major factor in touring. That is why they make them. Ever seen a pin binding? Nothing to it.
I’ve never toured...
But as someone who’s hiked a few feet with a few lbs in tow....
Cannot for the life of me , justify a few grams savings for uphill by sacrificing downhill safety and performance
