It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Everyone needs to get off Trump's back (edited opinion)
After a couple days of providing false hopes to people as a way to deflect criticism, he is now pitting states against themselves. Rather than acting on requests to centralize and distribute resources, he is putting the responsibility on the states to deliver. Not all states are equal in their ability. I'm legitimately mad at how childish he is being in such a time of crisis. Like dude wtf.
Dude seriously what the fuck. This is the time for the government to take the fuck over. This is still one country that will all be affected by this pandemic.
**This thread was edited on Mar 22nd 2020 at 5:15:28pm
SnowshoeThompsonYou would like it I’ve got a very conservative style. Lol. I could be Tom Wallisch and all of you would still downvote my skiing based on what I believe in.
Bbl gotta go to a klan meeting with my fellow supporters
damn you are so brave. it must be so hard to be a skier AND conservative
how infuriated are you now that you know you'll never get invited to fly on jeffs jet with donnie boy and slick willy?
CLQWhere is the hope here? Maybe you should post some clips to help spread some hope in the NS community
I will as soon as I recover from Obama’s “change”
And yeah trump should not have a Twitter. I agree 100%
i see him more as the Ron Swanson of government. Tear it down and run it like a business because that’s all it really is.
TheDoughAbidesdamn you are so brave. it must be so hard to be a skier AND conservative
how infuriated are you now that you know you'll never get invited to fly on jeffs jet with donnie boy and slick willy?
Yeah it’s tough being the absolute best at skiing In an industry filled with sub par skiers. I’m going to invent a dub where I exercise my second amendment mid flip with an American flag and a speaker bumping “simple man“ by lynyrd skynyrd. I’ll call it the freedom flip
Literally have no idea what you’re talking about but I kind of wish I knew somebody named Slick Willy
SnowshoeThompsonYeah it’s tough being the absolute best at skiing In an industry filled with sub par skiers. I’m going to invent a dub where I exercise my second amendment mid flip with an American flag and a speaker bumping “simple man“ by lynyrd skynyrd. I’ll call it the freedom flip
Literally have no idea what you’re talking about but I kind of wish I knew somebody named Slick Willy
*TURBONERD*I have to admit I hadn't heard of Dugin before this but some basic research shows that he's a Bolshevik the same way Nazis were socialists - in name only. There doesn't appear to be any sort of meaningful ideological similarity to the Soviet Union before it ceased to become a worker's state; instead it's pretty clearly an appeal to nostalgia little different from the ones Putin makes. Thus, I don't think it's accurate to say that Spencer's a Bolshevik in any way, but if we take him at his word - that he wants a world full of ethnostates - this makes him a Zionist who would likely support many of policies that fall in Israel's political center with regards to Israel as the (sotto voice) ethnostate it currently is. I can't find any information that National Bolshevism is a theory/ideology that exists meaningfully outside of Dugin - specifically none related to Yuri Bezmenov. This isn't to say that Soviet subversion in the West didn't exist (and vice versa), but if you have any sort of evidence that it was called National Bolshevism, I can't find it. I'm also not seeing anything about individualism in Dugin's work - if anything, like fascism in general, he seems more of a collectivist. I also couldn't find anything about "radical individualism" as a coherent ideology, though, so maybe it's just the same sort of branding as National Bolshevism and I'm missing it.
Long story short, I think it's more accurate to simply describe Spencer as a fascist, but neo-Nazi is pretty interchangeable for most people, and outside of a fairly in-depth description of ideology, the differences aren't particularly worth parsing.
Think of it this way... in the early 21st century, Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote a book called '200 Years Together.' In it, he writes about the historical Judeo-Russian relationship throughout the 17th, 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. Solzhenitsyn is a noble peace prize winner and was welcomed to the west as a Soviet Union defector. He was given free reign to speak about the gulag archipelago system under Stalin. Stalin was considered a national bolshevik, in that, unlike Trotskyites fronting world revolution abroad, he sought to establish a national movement before internationalism. Trotsky's aspirations were considered too impracticable and idealistic; that his global comintern movement could have severely hurt Sovietism and the stability of Stalin's national "revitalization" agenda.
Solzhenitsyn's book is banned in the US. The chapters that are censored concern Bolshevism, Trotskyism and Zionism. So, would it be surprising if Putin's Russia published Solzhenitsyn's book for all Russians' to read? Maybe to some, but seeing that Dugin is close to Putin, and seeing that the alt-right of which Spencer and Mike Enoch call the "new left," the latter person being an ethnic Jew who claims to be a white supremacist, yet hangs out with Duginists of whom praise Dugin's 4th political theory and use of "Chaos Magic," it is only practicable to conclude that National Bolsheviks are fronting Fascism.
There are thousands of members in the alt-right and nearly all of them praise some type of distorted bolshevism; or more specifically: the ideological subversion of the west. If they are fronting fascism and are neo-Nazis, then why are many of them ethnically Jewish? Have you ever heard of the leader of the US Nazi party in the 60's? He was a Zionist Jew who would goose-step through Jewish neighborhoods to scare them into supporting Zionism. The right-wing Likud party understands, that worldwide they do not have a majoriry support from the Jewish diaspora, so they have to use propganda to manage perception.
Likewise, it would be far more reasonable to conclude that mamy of these alt-righters (the Ezra Levant pundits) are Zionists at heart if it means securing Israel, whilst they praise Dugin's eurasianism, which is a well thought out geopolitical agenda for Israel and the upcoming multilateral economic order that the Bank for International Settlements has tirelessly written about. This order has been in the works for 80 years; only subverting the west through ideological subversion and demoralization will allow this multilateral economic order to prosper.
To note: There were such organizations as Bolshevik Zionists, such as the Poale. Many Zionists emigrated to Israel from the Pale of Settlement who were Bolsheviks at heart, most of whom, were not revolutionaries or subverters of national independence. Nevertheless, American publishers and Russia herself barred the transcription of Solzhenitsyn's '200 Years Together.'
That conveys to me, at least, that, just maybe, Russia's former revolutionaries are here in the US. Certainly the neo-Trotskyites are! Those neoconservatives, once Trotskyite communists who now front the Republican party. Their idea of spreading democracy could simply be their desire to contain and destabilize states; thus securing Israel. This is completely at odds with traditional US republican foreign policy agendas. James Petras wrote an interesting book about the interwoven but oftentimes contradicting foreign policy agendas between neocons and the old traditional republicans. The Afghanistan UNOCAL agenda was quite telling. During the early 21st century, many neocons attacked or disregarded this interventionist aspiration, instead fronting the Iraq and Palestinian pretext.
Furthermore, Dugin's occult, "chaos magic," Crowleyist belief system, whilst he fronts multilateral eurasianism, which is geopolitically favorable to Russia, China, Israel and the BRIC alliance, explains his subverting tendencies. He makes it quite clear in his books that the west must be economically and morally destroyed to permit multilateralism to flourish throughout Europe. Anatoliy Golitsyn, a soviet defector has noted that Communism never died in Russia. However, I see a much different prospect. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, free-market oligarchic looters were able to steal and buy up assets by the pennies. These oligarchs, for the most part, have good ties with Putin and Netanyahu. Putin also has good relations with Netanyahu, as does Trump. Putin was even given an award by the Likud for his bravery in protecting Israel. That is quite interesting considering Russia was supplying arms to Assad, bombing the SDF, Da'esh and dissenters who were against Assad's government. We are told Netanyahu is on good terms with Putin in Israeli news, we are also, curiously, told that Assad is on good terms with Netanyahu, also, in Israeli news. But one would not be able to discern this relation reading American affiliated news sources. The Left-leaning Zionists, those who claim to be progressives, unlike Netanyahu's right-wing Likud, speak out against Assad, in fact, people like Max Blumenthal, a Left-Leaning progressive Zionist at heart, reproves Netanyahu and the current state of affairs in Israel, rightfully so. Yet, Blumenthal and his father of who was embedded in the state department under Clinton, supported and propagandized the need to oust Assad through US military interventionism in Syria.
Then you have the BELT Road Initiative that Syria and Israel will certainly benefit from with China's support. Israel has also been caught time and time again transferring secret US documents and blueprints over to China, which certainly aids multilateralism and the dissolution of western unipolarism. German Neocon Alexander H. Joffe, writes that:
>>>In order to preserve the US empire, we MUST give it up."
>>>"Setting the stage for global governance can only be done with American leader- ship and American-led institutions of the sort schematically outlined here."
He continues:
>>>"New arrangements,” he says, “must come into being under American leadership to provide an alternative for states that are willing to accept rights and responsibilities.”
>>>"Possibly, after a period of chaos and anger, which in any event would simply intensify existing states of being, the institution [the United Nations] might be bludgeoned into changing. "
His essay goes onto explain the need for a multilateral order that benefits Europe and Israel; one reason he states, is that it makes perfect geographical sense.
So, we have all these contradicting ideologies and geopolitical agendas. The censorship of the aforementioned book written by Solzhenitsyn would only make sense, being that Russia is a geopolitical competitor, whom would be perfectly fine expelling Bolshevik ideology to the west, thus subverting an imperial power. And as for its censorship by US publishers and many in academia, exclaiming anti-Semitism when no such canard exists within its pages, can only be explained that they would rather not have you know the history of Zionism and Bolshevism, so as to protect their own cause. Richard Spencer has a wife who praises Sovietism and has been pictured wearing the communist hammer and sickle on numerous occasions. Spencer also, interestingly, has an old picture of him with Laura Bush.
Maybe I'm wrong... but watching these subverters, observing what they say, illustrates to me that they are not neo-Nazi's, nor are they white supremacists but rather, they are fronting the fascist cause as pretenders. Nazi's would NEVER praise bolshevism, the whole reason Nazism existed in its terribleness was because they believed Bolshevism was an enemy to "German traditionalism."
That link above, is the party Dugin founded, called Nazbols. It is said to be disbanded, but I certainly do not believe this is so. It's slogan prasies Bolshevism and uses the national bolshevik anthem. Despite them denying any association with fascism, their primary goal, I believe as pretenders, was to front fascism and lead it into Dugin's 4th political theory which mixes both elements of nationalism and bolshevism for Russia's cause. The subversion of national independence would thus be directed at the west. The left-leaning corporate media forgot to talk, or intentionally disregerded all of these relationships when mentioning the Trump limited hangout conspiracy collusion with Putin.
When we look back at the old Bolsheviks during the revolutionary years we see the expelling and sometimes execution of religious Jews, specifically the Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidic sect who have strong Zionistic views. Lenin even created a Jewish commissar party called the Yevsektsiya to persuade these Hasidic sects to join their class extermination cause. Many of these Yevsektsiya members were disillusioned ethnic Jews who had grown up in religious households. The persuasion did not work and after four years the Yevsektsiya defined these religious sects as a detriment to their cause, so too did they believe the World Zionist Congress to be detrimental to class warfare. The canard that all Bolsheviks were Jewish is a tired and often overused one by rightwing figures. But it is quite true to conclude that the old Bolsheviks were filled with disillusioned ethnic Jews, certainly not a majority but still having a tremendous amount of influence over decisions in the Cheka and commissariat. Solzhenitsyn provides evidence of these figures which proves disillusioned ethnic Jews were in the top positions of the old Bolshevik power, who would eventually start to expel and kill their own as ideologues for communism.
Putin's Russia is, at most, a caricature of Sovietism. Putin exclaims that the old Bolsheviks rested in the power of disillusioned Jews who abandoned their religiosity. Why would Putin want to make this fact clearly visible for the Russian people to see, when here in the US, it is censored?
The Chabad-Lunavitch sect has been revitalized to its former self under what was imperial Russia before the October revolution. Putin has had good relations with this Hasidic sect as has Netanyahu. This sect is theocratic and could be considered quite fascist in its belief system by some. So, evidently, as has been seen during the Bolshevik reign (Bolshevik persecution of Hasidic sects), Russia is certainly not fronting the bolshevik cause domestically, in fact they are exposing Bolshevism and promoting traditionalism and orthodoxy, but internationally, Russia very well could be fronting these Bolshevik subversives abroad for destabilization purposes, barring these same subversives domestically.
I tried to explain that as best as I could.
**This post was edited on Apr 17th 2020 at 7:13:14pm
greaterisraelThink of it this way... in the early 21st century, Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote a book called '200 Years Together.' In it, he writes about the historical Judeo-Russian relationship throughout the 17th, 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. Solzhenitsyn is a noble peace prize winner and was welcomed to the west as a Soviet Union defector. He was given free reign to speak about the gulag archipelago system under Stalin. Stalin was considered a national bolshevik, in that, unlike Trotskyites fronting world revolution abroad, he sought to establish a national movement before internationalism. Trotsky's aspirations were considered too impracticable and idealistic; that his global comintern movement could have severely hurt Sovietism and the stability of Stalin's national "revitalization" agenda.
Solzhenitsyn's book is banned in the US. The chapters that are censored concern Bolshevism, Trotskyism and Zionism. So, would it be surprising if Putin's Russia published Solzhenitsyn's book for all Russians' to read? Maybe to some, but seeing that Dugin is close to Putin, and seeing that the alt-right of which Spencer and Mike Enoch call the "new left," the latter person being an ethnic Jew who claims to be a white supremacist, yet hangs out with Duginists of whom praise Dugin's 4th political theory and use of "Chaos Magic," it is only practicable to conclude that National Bolsheviks are fronting Fascism.
There are thousands of members in the alt-right and nearly all of them praise some type of distorted bolshevism; or more specifically: the ideological subversion of the west. If they are fronting fascism and are neo-Nazis, then why are many of them ethnically Jewish? Have you ever heard of the leader of the US Nazi party in the 60's? He was a Zionist Jew who would goose-step through Jewish neighborhoods to scare them into supporting Zionism.
Likewise, it would be far more reasonable to conclude that they are Zionists at heart if it means securing Israel, whilst they praise Dugin's eurasianism, which is a well thought out geopolitical agenda for Israel and the upcoming multilateral economic order that the Bank for International Settlements has tirelessly written about. This order has been in the works for 80 years; only subverting the west through ideological subversion and demoralization will allow the multilateral economic to prosper.
To note: There were such organizations as Bolshevik Zionists, such as Poale. Many Zionists emigrated to Israel who were Bolsheviks at heart, most of whom, likely the lot of them, were not revolutionaries or subverters of national independence. Nevertheless, American publishers and Russia herself barred the transcription of Solzhenitsyn's '200 Years Together.'
That conveys to me, at least, that, just maybe, Russia's former revolutionaries are here in the US. Certainly the neo-Trotskyites are! Those neoconservatives, once Trotskyite communists who now front the Republican party. Their idea of spreading democracy could simply be their desire to contain and destabilize states; thus securing Israel. This is completely at odds with traditional US republican foreign policy agendas. James Petras wrote an interesting book about the interwoven but oftentimes contradicting foreign policy agendas between neocons and the old traditional republicans. The Afghanistan UNOCAL agenda was quite telling. During the early 21st century, many neocons attacked or disregarded this interventionist aspiration, instead fronting the Iraq and Palestinian pretext.
Furthermore, Dugin's occult, "chaos magic" Crowley belief system, whilst he fronts multilateral eurasianism, which is geopolitically favorable to Russia, China, Israel and the BRIC alliance, explains his subverting tendencies. He makes it quite clear in his books that the west must be economically and morally destroyed to permit multilateralism to flourish throughout Europe. Anatoliy Golitsyn, a soviet defector has noted that Communism never died in Russia. However, I see a much different prospect. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, free-market oligarchic looters were able to steal and buy up assets by the pennies. These oligarchs, for the most part, have good ties with Putin and Netanyahu. Putin also has good relations with Netanyahu, as does Trump. Putin was even given an award by the Likud for his bravery in protecting Israel. That is quite interesting considering Russia was supplying arms to Assad, bombing the SDF, Da'esh and dissenters who were against Assad's government. We are told Netanyahu is on good terms with Putin in Israeli news, we are also, curiously, told that Assad is on good terms with Netanyahu, also, in Israeli news. But one would not be able to discern this relation reading American affiliated news sources. The Left-leaning Zionists, those who claim to be progressives, unlike Netanyahu's right-wing Likud, speak out against Assad, in fact, people like Max Blumenthal, a Left-Leaning progressive Zionist at heart, reproves Netanyahu and the current state of affairs in Israel. Yet, Blumenthal and his father who was embedded in the state department under Clinton, supported and propagandized the need to oust Assad through US military interventionism in Syria. Then you have the BELT Road Initiative that Syria and Israel will certainly benefit from with China's support. Israel has also been caught time and time again transferring secret US documents and blueprints over to China, which certainly aids multilateralism and the dissolution of western unipolarism. German Neocon Alexander H. Joffe, writes that:
>>>In order to preserve the US empire, we MUST give it up."
>>>"Setting the stage for global governance can only be done with American leader- ship and American-led institutions of the sort schematically outlined here."
He continues:
>>>"New arrangements,” he says, “must come into being under American leadership to provide an alternative for states that are willing to accept rights and responsibilities.”
>>>"Possibly, after a period of chaos and anger, which in any event would simply intensify existing states of being, the institution [the United Nations] might be bludgeoned into changing. "
His essay goes onto explain the need for a multilateral order that benefits Europe and Israel; one reason he states, is that it makes perfect geographical sense.
So, we have all these contradicting ideologies and geopolitical agendas. The censorship of the aforementioned book written by Solzhenitsyn would only make sense, being that Russia is a geopolitical competitor, whom would be perfectly fine expelling Bolshevik ideology to the west, thus subverting an imperial power. And as for its censorship by US publishers and many in Academia, exclaiming anti-Semitism when no such canard exists within its pages, can only be explained that they would rather not have you know the history of Zionism and Bolshevism, so as to protect their own cause. Richard Spencer has a wife who praises Sovietism and has been pictured wearing the communist hammer an sickle on numerous occasions. Spencer also, interestingly, has an old picture of him with Laura Bush.
Maybe I'm wrong... but watching these subverters, observing what they say, illustrates to me that they are not neo-Nazi's, nor are they white supremacists but rather, they are fronting the fascist cause as pretenders. Nazi's would NEVER praise bolshevism, the whole reason Nazism existed in its terribleness was because they believed Bolshevism was an enemy to "German traditionalism."
That link above, is the party Dugin founded, called Nazbols. It is said to be disbanded, but I certainly do not believe this is so. When we look back at the old Bolsheviks during the revolutionary years we see the expelling and sometimes execution of religious Jews, specifically the Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidic sect who have strong Zionistic views. Lenin even created a Jewish commissar party called the Yevsektsiya to persuade these Hasidic sects to join their class extermination cause. Many of these Yevsektsiya members were disillusioned ethnic Jews who had grown up in religious households. The persuasion did not work and after four years the Yevsektsiya defined these religious sects as a detriment to their cause, so too did they believe the World Zionist Congress to be detrimental to class warfare. The canard that all Bolsheviks were Jewish is a tired and often overused one by rightwing figures. But it is quite true to conclude that the old Bolsheviks were filled with disillusioned ethnic Jews, certainly not a majority but still having a tremendous amount of influence over decisions in the Cheka and commissariat. Solzhenitsyn provides evidence of these figures which proves disillusioned ethnic Jews were in the top positions of Bolshevik power, who would eventually start to expel and kill their own as ideologues for communism.
Putin's Russia is, at most, a caricature of Sovietism. Putin exclaims that the old Bolsheviks rested in the power of disillusioned Jews who abandoned their religiosity. Why would Putin want to make this fact clearly visible to the Russian people, when here in the US, it is censored?
The Chabad-Lunavitch sect has been revitalized to its former self under what was imperial Russia. Putin has had good relations with this Hasidic sect as has Netanyahu. This sect is theocratic and could be considered quite fascist in its belief system by some. So, evidently, as has been seen during the Bolshevik reign (Bolshevik persecution of Hasidic sects), Russia is certainly not fronting bolshevik domestically but might well be fronting it abroad for destabilization purposes, barring these subversives domestically.
**This post was edited on Apr 17th 2020 at 5:03:54pm
this mf just ctrl-c'ed a wikipedia page for this lmao
SnowshoeThompsonI will as soon as I recover from Obama’s “change”
And yeah trump should not have a Twitter. I agree 100%
i see him more as the Ron Swanson of government. Tear it down and run it like a business because that’s all it really is.
Ron Swansom and Trump would not get along. Trump likes to centralize decision making to the oval office, a libertarian like Ron would want the power decentralized. Trump signed a $2 trillion stimulus, Ron would have chewed it up and spit it out. "My ideal government would be one guy, in a room, and all he does is determine who to nuke." Trump likes big government, Ron hates it as much as possible.
Never thought fictional characters would be such political talking figures lol.
*TURBONERD*I have to admit I hadn't heard of Dugin before this but some basic research shows that he's a Bolshevik the same way Nazis were socialists - in name only.
Yes, possibly in neology only; like what neocons are to spreading a distorted caricature of democracy abroad.
This might be a wild ride for some, but whatever...
>>>"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”
That quote alone, exemplifies the Alt-right movement of whose members adore Daddy Trump.
Alexander Dugin's "left hand path” Crowleyist belief system (he has a few videos of his former years reciting Thelma rites) is only a caricature of fascism. He espouses fervent nationalism for Russia, whilst encouraging the use of communist subversives to undermine the west for Russia's sake. Since he created the National Bolshevik party, it is only fair to conclude he probably is a bolshevik at heart.
^ ^ ^ Here is Dugin in a room with National Bolsheviks. Hung on the wall is the Nazbol flag and the Chinese communist flag.
Dugin's Left Hand (the “dark side") path, his subversives, bring about destruction and chaos to scare people into the open, welcoming Right-Hand (the “light side,” which brings about construction and order. As above so below; the dialectical synthesis.
Might that be why a National Bolshevik, who practices the occult and openly talks about Satanism would front a fascist cause whilst praising the religiosity of Russian Orthodoxy? He acts his many parts markedly well, possibly why he was recruited by Putin.
Dugin writes:
>>>“Only then will we be able to understand the secret dimension of Heraclitus the Dark: all is one – logos is chaos. Darkness is light. THERE is here. (PP, 61)”.
An occultist who praises Crowley, venerates the religiosity of Russian Orthodoxy, yet writes that LOGOS is chaos and Darkness is Light. He's all over the place.
Here is a better representation of the Hegelian dialectic being played by Dugin and possibly other wealthy internationalists.
^ ^ ^ This is the new Carrollton Federal Building in Lanham, Maryland where the IRS is housed among other federal agencies. It's just decorative art most would assume; or you'd figure someone would spell it out for them; the Washington Post states:
>>>The 1997 work is called “Vox Populi,” which is Latin for “the voice of the people.”
What does “Vox Populi” have to do with the IRS? Can citizens weigh in or vote on anything about the IRS? Why are the pillars black and white? Why is there a pyramid with a capstone in the middle?
Two more photos, the latter written on the hermetic pole of the statue.
The photos above represent what Dugin is fronting. This sculpture depicts the Left Hand Path and the Right Hand Path of the occultic spirituality. To deny this esotericism is to be ignorant.
As you can see, the Left Hand (which sits on a black base) is pointing over to the open Right Hand (which sits upon a white base). And thus, it follows the aforementioned Hegelian dialectic mentioned above. So, we should assume that the real front, the real agenda being sought after is centered on the right hand, that of light. They are using the left to scare you to the right hand path, whilst they front the right.
The Anglo-American branch of unipolarists are acting as the Left Hand (bringing terror, war, and theft to foreign nations that is destroying the existing world order and especially the international communities trust in the west; scaring humanity towards something new), this has been written about in well-known magazines such as The Economist and hosted on international banking websites such as the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
Whereas, the BRICS branch of the multilateral order are acting as the Right Hand (“opposing” the actions of the Anglo-American axis and welcoming humanity into a “peaceful, fair” new economic global order that they are constructing as I write this.
And maybe I'm wrong in all of this. Maybe Dugin is a high grade professional troll, as some of his countrymen have contended. I personally do not believe this considering the tremendous amount of international support he venerates from all kinds of people. If he is not serious in his movement, certainly others are. And notably, his eurasianist movement follows the multilateral order that the Bank for International Settlements, Council on Foreign Relations and even the International Monetary Fund have written about or hosted others to write about; sometimes in praise of the dissolution of unipolarism. As the neocon Alexander H. Joffe contended:
>>>In order to preserve the US empire, we MUST give it up.
Joffe, having promoted the wests destabilization campaign in south west Asia, considers that it would be advantageous for a multilateral order to develop along these destabilized regions. He contends that the US will have its fair share in this new global order but it would be of a lesser state, one barren of empire.
The East and the West dialectic could very well be merged into a New Economic Order fronted by multilateralism, with Europe being consumed as well, in its weakened state.
That way a supra-national global governance could emerge with multilateralism taking the helm as Joffe contends.
>>>Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Saturday that his country would never accept a unipolar world.
>>>Noting that there was one “undisputed” unipolar leadership trying to control the current world and force others to obey, Putin said Russia would never accept such attempts.
If you read Rockefeller's think tank document 'Prospects for America,' they write about disintegrating western unipolarism for BRIC aligned multilateralsim. These internationalists understood it that if global governance were to develop in its full fledged form the Chinese people would be far more easier to manipulate to front their cause as the cohesive, nationalistic people they are. They would take this cause as their own.
There are still many unipolar neocons who would love to start a war with China if they had the chance. But for many European neocons and those closely aligned with Israel, they foresee Israel's prominent role in an upcoming multilateral order.
Concerning Chinese nationalism, that reminds me of a professor I had awhile back who always mentioned his love for Mao. A man who aided in the killing of nearly 100,000,000 people, and yet my professor still worshipped this leader from his adolescent years.
Furthermore, the Rockefeller document then goes onto say that this transformation will cause chaos in the western world; the economy would go into shambles, but order would later be restored from this chaos. In its place would stand a multilateral internationalist order that favors a kind of global governance.
...Not my words...
These aspirations or ideologies are not espoused or cooked up in some paranoid person's mind (although, Dugin seems quite paranoid and delusional to me), rather they are oftentimes conversed about by wealthy elites in broad daylight for all to see. The rhetoric and authorship of these views is just so dry, impassive and long-winded that their articles, documents and books can sit on a shelve for years, well after the ideology becomes reality for all to live in.
It certainly doesn't help too, during this current doldrum, that BRIC countries' central banks are stocking up on gold and have spoken about their desire to dedollarize. The US economy is tied so fiercely to international markets that a sudden transformation could plunge her into detrimental economic strife which could end in a default.
Now, to my astonishment is the amount of so-called alt-righters, what Richard Spencer terms the "new left..."
...who heroize Dugin and praise Donald Trump, such as the alleged nazi Milo Yiannopoulos. Milo is a fervent Trump supporter who just so happens to be a Jew (nothing wrong with that; though it sort of debunks the tireless "he's a Nazi" slander. One reason being that it is quite obvious he was never a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party; not only because it disbanded long ago, duh, but because he is a gay Jew of whom would have most definitely been imprisoned by the Nazis or worse).
So, this alt-righter, slandered as a Nazi by the media is also a homosexual who calls Trump "Daddy" and has said he "had sex with his priest at 15," and that sexual pedophile relations, specifically between young boys and older men is totally okay.
These talking points, whether true or not, seem deliberately subversive to me.
And what about Spencer, Enoch, Southern, Levant, and Goldy, among tens of thousands of other alt-righters? The lot of them praise Dugin; many heroizing the old Bolsheviks as well as wave Dugin's National Bolshevik flag for all of their comrades to see. And do not forget it, they all love Trump.
Just a meme, nah.
^ ^ ^ Another alt-right Trump supporter with Milo.
^ ^ ^ Look, it's Alex Jones hosting Dugin, who also hosted Trump.
^ ^ ^ The 4th political theory symbol.
>>>"Yeah, I’m a crypto Bolshevist. I am not a conservative.” --- Richard Spencer
>>>"And we are a kind of revolutionary movement that is analogous to the Bolsheviks." --- Richard Spencer
^ ^ ^ Spencer's communist wife.
^ ^ ^ What the hell is this? Not only is Spencer and his wife taking pictures with Laura Bush but she has on a St. George ribbon given by the Russian state as an honor.
George W. Bush, was likely around somewhere. Maybe he is the one who took the picture. He was the president for the neoconservative Trotskyite policy group; originating from Bolshevism.
^ ^ ^ Some more alternative media Duginists.
^ ^ ^ Same Trump supporting media pundits hosting Alexander Dugin.
^ ^ ^ David Duke with Alexander Dugin. A fervent Trump supporter who, I believe is a plant. You don't get free reign to speak on CNN as former KKK if you aren't a plant.
^ ^ ^ Spencer.
^ ^ ^ Alt-righter Bolshevik Mike Enoch fronting a Christian cause. Notice all the sigils.
^ ^ ^ Oh look, its internationalist trilateralist, Zbigniew Brzezinski meeting with Dugin.
Personally, I see Donald Trump, the former democrat turned republican, as a subversive; solely because he utilizes all the same perception management tactics that manufacture consent on partisan lines. From his contradictory rhetoric, which seems to be intentionally demoralizing; to his debauchee and delinquent past behavior with the likes of convicted child molester Epstein and his close ties to Mossad and Russian oligarchs. From his choosing of Lawyer Alan Dershowitz of whom stated in 1997:
>>>The age of consent should be lowered. It certainly should not be as high as 17 or 16. Reasonable people can disagree over whether it should be as low as 14. Fifteen would seem like an appropriate compromise.”
Dershowitz met Epstein in 1996 and this is the person Trump chose to represent him? This does not even include the interest group of Roy Cohn and their connections to the Franklin pedophile affair; to the Marianos, Tevfik Arif and DC call boy sex trafficking scandal. Trump and his friends are all interwoven into these events.
As for Dugin, he writes:
>>>The Europe for Eurasians is absolutely negative category which can be known and loved as one could love, for example, damned souls in Hell. (…) So we can love Europe as we can love alien incurable sick men, lepers, hoodlums, villains, scoundrels. We can love it, but that’s a special, Eurasian, kind of love (tough love, no doubt, KT)
Alexander Dugin is always eager to point out to Serbian public:
>>>“We and you are the same!”
Now, would a Nazi say anything like this:
>>>I am for the blacks. White civilization, its cultural achievements, its lying, anti-human model of the world, constructed by it, did not validate itself. Everything is heading towards the beginning of anti-white pogroms across the planet. Russia will only be saved by [the fact] that we are not purely white. Thieving international corporations, persecution and suppression of all other races, MTV, the blue and the pink, these are the fruits of white civilization which need to be gotten rid of. That is why I am for the reds, the yellows, greens, blacks – only not for the whites. I am wholeheartedly on the side of the people of Zimbabwe.” --- Dugin
A Nazi in his warped perfect Aryan ideology would never utter such words as these.
An anonymous user named Silent, writes, and I could not have said it better:
>>>The rotation towards the untrue right of traditionalism and nationalism that we see in the world today is, from the metaphysical and eschatological perspective, just another phase in the dialectics of counter-traditional subversion by means of counterfeit and redirection of the energies of the masses into yet another false answer. The End Times roll on, and the “awliyah al-Shaytan” laugh from the shadows.
"Personally, I see Donald Trump, the former democrat turned republican, as a subversive; solely because he utilizes all the same perception management tactics that manufacture consent on partisan lines. From his contradictory rhetoric, which seems to be intentionally demoralizing; to his debauchee and delinquent past behavior with the likes of convicted child molester Epstein and his close ties to Mossad and Russian oligarchs. From his choosing of Lawyer Alan Dershowitz of whom stated in 1997:
>>>The age of consent should be lowered. It certainly should not be as high as 17 or 16. Reasonable people can disagree over whether it should be as low as 14. Fifteen would seem like an appropriate compromise.”
Dershowitz met Epstein in 1996 and this is the person Trump chose to represent him? This does not even include the interest group of Roy Cohn and their connections to the Franklin pedophile affair; to the Marianos, Tevfik Arif and DC call boy sex trafficking scandal. Trump and his friends are all interwoven into these events.
"
But yes, let's ignore the fact that Trump was best buddies with the largest known sex slave trafficker of children and hired a lawyer known to rape children. Let's ignore the fact that Trump was involved in numerous rape lawsuits including one with him and Epstein being jointly sued by a woman claiming they raped her at a party when she was 14. Not to mention, Trump was accused of forcibly raping his ex-wife after she insulted his POS hair transplant.
National Bolsheviki communist subversives seriously have a stiffy for their hero Trump. Because we are in a post-truth defacto world where demoralization trumps critical thought, nobody really knows what's going on. I'm just saying, Trump is a pedophile who hangs out with Eurasianist oligarchs and convicted child molesters. He certainly MIGA for Netanyahu's Likud but he's a detriment to the US.
I'm going to predict here for my last post: Trump will win the presidency in 2020 but he will be the last president of the US. If I'm right and the US collapses you send me 5 bucks via Venmo, if I'm wrong 5,000 via venmo to you.
National Bolsheviki communist subversives seriously have a stiffy for their hero Trump. Because we are in a post-truth defacto world where demoralization trumps critical thought, nobody really knows what's going on. I'm just saying, Trump is a pedophile who hangs out with Eurasianist oligarchs and convicted child molesters. He certainly MIGA for Netanyahu's Likud but he's a detriment to the US.
I'm going to predict here for my last post: Trump will win the presidency in 2020 but he will be the last president of the US. If I'm right and the US collapses you send me 5 bucks via Venmo, if I'm wrong 5,000 via venmo to you.
Yeah, your train of thought is a bit too 'out there' for me, but I respect the research.
Anyway, sure Trump will likely get re-elected this year, and then anything can happen given the right dominos falling, but the collapse of the US in 2024 is still highly unlikely, so I'll take your bet.
Monsieur_PatateYeah, your train of thought is a bit too 'out there' for me, but I respect the research.
Anyway, sure Trump will likely get re-elected this year, and then anything can happen given the right dominos falling, but the collapse of the US in 2024 is still highly unlikely, so I'll take your bet.
The only person who had a chance against Trump was Sanders, and Sanders did exactly what he did in 2016.l; as if he never really wanted to be president. It is a given that Trump will win. I just don't think the US can economically maintain their status in the world for too much longer, espeically with the BRIC alliance. It is only a matter of time, and I think the US will not go down without a fight.
Remember what Pence said to a class of military members around 6 months ago:
>>>[Sometime very soon] you will be fighting in Europe.
greaterisraelThe only person who had a chance against Trump was Sanders, and Sanders did exactly what he did in 2016.l; as if he never really wanted to be president. It is a given that Trump will win. I just don't think the US can economically maintain their status in the world for too much longer, espeically with the BRIC alliance. It is only a matter of time, and I think the US will not go down without a fight.
Remember what Pence said to a class of military members around 6 months ago:
>>>[Sometime very soon] you will be fighting in Europe.
No, Bernie got screwed by the dems again. In 2016 it was the super delegate system. In 2020 it was having literally everyone but Biden drop out to consolidate against him. I don't even like the guy but feel bad for him cause he's got a movement behind him but gets screwed everytime.
r00kieNo, Bernie got screwed by the dems again. In 2016 it was the super delegate system. In 2020 it was having literally everyone but Biden drop out to consolidate against him. I don't even like the guy but feel bad for him cause he's got a movement behind him but gets screwed everytime.
This narrative is so fucking wrong.
Bernie lost in Biden to groups he carried against Clinton, even when everyone else was still in the race. That alone should tell you something.
It also wasn't a foregone conclusion he would take the more liberal voters from other candidates. Look at the statement below.
"Morning Consult, for instance, found that 43 percent of Warren supporters would opt for Sanders as their second choice, while 36 percent would choose Biden. And a recent Ipsos/Reuters poll found that Warren supporters’ second-choice loyalties were evenly split, with 47 percent picking Sanders, and 46 percent backing Biden."
He also didn't improve on his 2016 run- He got little to no backing from centrists, blacks, southern, and older voters this year either.
If you want the data for these claims, just ask and I can bring it up.
Also, the thought that BRIC countries will overtake the US is laughable. Brazil is FUCKED with Bolsonaro, Russia is heavily dependent on oil that is in the dumps currently, South Africa can hardly seem to provide its people with enough water and is still fraught with racial tension. Sure, China and India may be threats, but they've both got hurdles to overcome first.
Bernie lost in Biden to groups he carried against Clinton, even when everyone else was still in the race. That alone should tell you something.
It also wasn't a foregone conclusion he would take the more liberal voters from other candidates. Look at the statement below.
"Morning Consult, for instance, found that 43 percent of Warren supporters would opt for Sanders as their second choice, while 36 percent would choose Biden. And a recent Ipsos/Reuters poll found that Warren supporters’ second-choice loyalties were evenly split, with 47 percent picking Sanders, and 46 percent backing Biden."
He also didn't improve on his 2016 run- He got little to no backing from centrists, blacks, southern, and older voters this year either.
If you want the data for these claims, just ask and I can bring it up.
Also, the thought that BRIC countries will overtake the US is laughable. Brazil is FUCKED with Bolsonaro, Russia is heavily dependent on oil that is in the dumps currently, South Africa can hardly seem to provide its people with enough water and is still fraught with racial tension. Sure, China and India may be threats, but they've both got hurdles to overcome first.
Just calling it as I see it. Dead heat against Clinton, other than the super delegates. Next times wins two early primary's with Joe not even close. Pete, the closest drops out, most of those supports wouldn't go for such a progressive platform so Biden picks those up. Biden wasn't significant until everyone dropped out.
r00kieJust calling it as I see it. Dead heat against Clinton, other than the super delegates. Next times wins two early primary's with Joe not even close. Pete, the closest drops out, most of those supports wouldn't go for such a progressive platform so Biden picks those up. Biden wasn't significant until everyone dropped out.
Yeah, well it's wrong lol.
You can call it as you see it but this right here is the reality:
In fact, Biden finished first in 93 percent of the counties that Clinton won in 2016. On top of that, he won 83 percent of the counties that Sanders carried in 2016, meaning that Sanders held onto very little of what he won last time around.
You can call it as you see it but this right here is the reality:
In fact, Biden finished first in 93 percent of the counties that Clinton won in 2016. On top of that, he won 83 percent of the counties that Sanders carried in 2016, meaning that Sanders held onto very little of what he won last time around.
Yeah, he didn't do as well this time around, I'll give ya that. But everyone dropping out and backing one candidate once he is a threat looks bad and fits the mold against him that the superdelegate system made.
r00kieNo, Bernie got screwed by the dems again. In 2016 it was the super delegate system. In 2020 it was having literally everyone but Biden drop out to consolidate against him. I don't even like the guy but feel bad for him cause he's got a movement behind him but gets screwed everytime.
Bernie is a Labour Zionist Lockheed corporate sellout, that's why he gave his support for Clinton.
greaterisraelYes, possibly in neology only; like what neocons are to spreading a distorted caricature of democracy abroad.
This might be a wild ride for some, but whatever...
>>>"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”
That quote alone, exemplifies the Alt-right movement of whose members adore Daddy Trump.
Alexander Dugin's "left hand path” Crowleyist belief system (he has a few videos of his former years reciting Thelma rites) is only a caricature of fascism. He espouses fervent nationalism for Russia, whilst encouraging the use of communist subversives to undermine the west for Russia's sake. Since he created the National Bolshevik party, it is only fair to conclude he probably is a bolshevik at heart.
^ ^ ^ Here is Dugin in a room with National Bolsheviks. Hung on the wall is the Nazbol flag and the Chinese communist flag.
Dugin's Left Hand (the “dark side") path, his subversives, bring about destruction and chaos to scare people into the open, welcoming Right-Hand (the “light side,” which brings about construction and order. As above so below; the dialectical synthesis.
Might that be why a National Bolshevik, who practices the occult and openly talks about Satanism would front a fascist cause whilst praising the religiosity of Russian Orthodoxy? He acts his many parts markedly well, possibly why he was recruited by Putin.
Dugin writes:
>>>“Only then will we be able to understand the secret dimension of Heraclitus the Dark: all is one – logos is chaos. Darkness is light. THERE is here. (PP, 61)”.
An occultist who praises Crowley, venerates the religiosity of Russian Orthodoxy, yet writes that LOGOS is chaos and Darkness is Light. He's all over the place.
Here is a better representation of the Hegelian dialectic being played by Dugin and possibly other wealthy internationalists.
^ ^ ^ This is the new Carrollton Federal Building in Lanham, Maryland where the IRS is housed among other federal agencies. It's just decorative art most would assume; or you'd figure someone would spell it out for them; the Washington Post states:
>>>The 1997 work is called “Vox Populi,” which is Latin for “the voice of the people.”
What does “Vox Populi” have to do with the IRS? Can citizens weigh in or vote on anything about the IRS? Why are the pillars black and white? Why is there a pyramid with a capstone in the middle?
Two more photos, the latter written on the hermetic pole of the statue.
The photos above represent what Dugin is fronting. This sculpture depicts the Left Hand Path and the Right Hand Path of the occultic spirituality. To deny this esotericism is to be ignorant.
As you can see, the Left Hand (which sits on a black base) is pointing over to the open Right Hand (which sits upon a white base). And thus, it follows the aforementioned Hegelian dialectic mentioned above. So, we should assume that the real front, the real agenda being sought after is centered on the right hand, that of light. They are using the left to scare you to the right hand path, whilst they front the right.
The Anglo-American branch of unipolarists are acting as the Left Hand (bringing terror, war, and theft to foreign nations that is destroying the existing world order and especially the international communities trust in the west; scaring humanity towards something new), this has been written about in well-known magazines such as The Economist and hosted on international banking websites such as the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
Whereas, the BRICS branch of the multilateral order are acting as the Right Hand (“opposing” the actions of the Anglo-American axis and welcoming humanity into a “peaceful, fair” new economic global order that they are constructing as I write this.
And maybe I'm wrong in all of this. Maybe Dugin is a high grade professional troll, as some of his countrymen have contended. I personally do not believe this considering the tremendous amount of international support he venerates from all kinds of people. If he is not serious in his movement, certainly others are. And notably, his eurasianist movement follows the multilateral order that the Bank for International Settlements, Council on Foreign Relations and even the International Monetary Fund have written about or hosted others to write about; sometimes in praise of the dissolution of unipolarism. As the neocon Alexander H. Joffe contended:
>>>In order to preserve the US empire, we MUST give it up.
Joffe, having promoted the wests destabilization campaign in south west Asia, considers that it would be advantageous for a multilateral order to develop along these destabilized regions. He contends that the US will have its fair share in this new global order but it would be of a lesser state, one barren of empire.
The East and the West dialectic could very well be merged into a New Economic Order fronted by multilateralism, with Europe being consumed as well, in its weakened state.
That way a supra-national global governance could emerge with multilateralism taking the helm as Joffe contends.
>>>Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Saturday that his country would never accept a unipolar world.
>>>Noting that there was one “undisputed” unipolar leadership trying to control the current world and force others to obey, Putin said Russia would never accept such attempts.
If you read Rockefeller's think tank document 'Prospects for America,' they write about disintegrating western unipolarism for BRIC aligned multilateralsim. These internationalists understood it that if global governance were to develop in its full fledged form the Chinese people would be far more easier to manipulate to front their cause as the cohesive, nationalistic people they are. They would take this cause as their own.
There are still many unipolar neocons who would love to start a war with China if they had the chance. But for many European neocons and those closely aligned with Israel, they foresee Israel's prominent role in an upcoming multilateral order.
Concerning Chinese nationalism, that reminds me of a professor I had awhile back who always mentioned his love for Mao. A man who aided in the killing of nearly 100,000,000 people, and yet my professor still worshipped this leader from his adolescent years.
Furthermore, the Rockefeller document then goes onto say that this transformation will cause chaos in the western world; the economy would go into shambles, but order would later be restored from this chaos. In its place would stand a multilateral internationalist order that favors a kind of global governance.
...Not my words...
These aspirations or ideologies are not espoused or cooked up in some paranoid person's mind (although, Dugin seems quite paranoid and delusional to me), rather they are oftentimes conversed about by wealthy elites in broad daylight for all to see. The rhetoric and authorship of these views is just so dry, impassive and long-winded that their articles, documents and books can sit on a shelve for years, well after the ideology becomes reality for all to live in.
It certainly doesn't help too, during this current doldrum, that BRIC countries' central banks are stocking up on gold and have spoken about their desire to dedollarize. The US economy is tied so fiercely to international markets that a sudden transformation could plunge her into detrimental economic strife which could end in a default.
Now, to my astonishment is the amount of so-called alt-righters, what Richard Spencer terms the "new left..."
...who heroize Dugin and praise Donald Trump, such as the alleged nazi Milo Yiannopoulos. Milo is a fervent Trump supporter who just so happens to be a Jew (nothing wrong with that; though it sort of debunks the tireless "he's a Nazi" slander. One reason being that it is quite obvious he was never a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party; not only because it disbanded long ago, duh, but because he is a gay Jew of whom would have most definitely been imprisoned by the Nazis or worse).
So, this alt-righter, slandered as a Nazi by the media is also a homosexual who calls Trump "Daddy" and has said he "had sex with his priest at 15," and that sexual pedophile relations, specifically between young boys and older men is totally okay.
These talking points, whether true or not, seem deliberately subversive to me.
And what about Spencer, Enoch, Southern, Levant, and Goldy, among tens of thousands of other alt-righters? The lot of them praise Dugin; many heroizing the old Bolsheviks as well as wave Dugin's National Bolshevik flag for all of their comrades to see. And do not forget it, they all love Trump.
Just a meme, nah.
^ ^ ^ Another alt-right Trump supporter with Milo.
^ ^ ^ Look, it's Alex Jones hosting Dugin, who also hosted Trump.
^ ^ ^ The 4th political theory symbol.
>>>"Yeah, I’m a crypto Bolshevist. I am not a conservative.” --- Richard Spencer
>>>"And we are a kind of revolutionary movement that is analogous to the Bolsheviks." --- Richard Spencer
^ ^ ^ Spencer's communist wife.
^ ^ ^ What the hell is this? Not only is Spencer and his wife taking pictures with Laura Bush but she has on a St. George ribbon given by the Russian state as an honor.
George W. Bush, was likely around somewhere. Maybe he is the one who took the picture. He was the president for the neoconservative Trotskyite policy group; originating from Bolshevism.
^ ^ ^ Some more alternative media Duginists.
^ ^ ^ Same Trump supporting media pundits hosting Alexander Dugin.
^ ^ ^ David Duke with Alexander Dugin. A fervent Trump supporter who, I believe is a plant. You don't get free reign to speak on CNN as former KKK if you aren't a plant.
^ ^ ^ Spencer.
^ ^ ^ Alt-righter Bolshevik Mike Enoch fronting a Christian cause. Notice all the sigils.
^ ^ ^ Oh look, its internationalist trilateralist, Zbigniew Brzezinski meeting with Dugin.
Personally, I see Donald Trump, the former democrat turned republican, as a subversive; solely because he utilizes all the same perception management tactics that manufacture consent on partisan lines. From his contradictory rhetoric, which seems to be intentionally demoralizing; to his debauchee and delinquent past behavior with the likes of convicted child molester Epstein and his close ties to Mossad and Russian oligarchs. From his choosing of Lawyer Alan Dershowitz of whom stated in 1997:
>>>The age of consent should be lowered. It certainly should not be as high as 17 or 16. Reasonable people can disagree over whether it should be as low as 14. Fifteen would seem like an appropriate compromise.”
Dershowitz met Epstein in 1996 and this is the person Trump chose to represent him? This does not even include the interest group of Roy Cohn and their connections to the Franklin pedophile affair; to the Marianos, Tevfik Arif and DC call boy sex trafficking scandal. Trump and his friends are all interwoven into these events.
As for Dugin, he writes:
>>>The Europe for Eurasians is absolutely negative category which can be known and loved as one could love, for example, damned souls in Hell. (…) So we can love Europe as we can love alien incurable sick men, lepers, hoodlums, villains, scoundrels. We can love it, but that’s a special, Eurasian, kind of love (tough love, no doubt, KT)
Alexander Dugin is always eager to point out to Serbian public:
>>>“We and you are the same!”
Now, would a Nazi say anything like this:
>>>I am for the blacks. White civilization, its cultural achievements, its lying, anti-human model of the world, constructed by it, did not validate itself. Everything is heading towards the beginning of anti-white pogroms across the planet. Russia will only be saved by [the fact] that we are not purely white. Thieving international corporations, persecution and suppression of all other races, MTV, the blue and the pink, these are the fruits of white civilization which need to be gotten rid of. That is why I am for the reds, the yellows, greens, blacks – only not for the whites. I am wholeheartedly on the side of the people of Zimbabwe.” --- Dugin
A Nazi in his warped perfect Aryan ideology would never utter such words as these.
An anonymous user named Silent, writes, and I could not have said it better:
>>>The rotation towards the untrue right of traditionalism and nationalism that we see in the world today is, from the metaphysical and eschatological perspective, just another phase in the dialectics of counter-traditional subversion by means of counterfeit and redirection of the energies of the masses into yet another false answer. The End Times roll on, and the “awliyah al-Shaytan” laugh from the shadows.
skiermanIts like you're combining all of my posts with a pro-Trump 4chan thread, throwing it into a shitty A.I and you're posting the incoherent results.... and you had to edit that trash?
You kids are fucking hopeless and further evidence this world is overpopulated and needs to be thinned out. Thank God for COVID-19 and Trump's unfathomable incompetence.
Meh. I just wanted to say im a little bit sorry for being so rough on you. I always seem to roast you harder than what you throw at me and i kind of feel bad about it because being ginger is shitty enough i would imagine.
DolanReloadedMeh. I just wanted to say im a little bit sorry for being so rough on you. I always seem to roast you harder than what you throw at me and i kind of feel bad about it because being ginger is shitty enough i would imagine.
DolanReloadedMeh. I just wanted to say im a little bit sorry for being so rough on you. I always seem to roast you harder than what you throw at me and i kind of feel bad about it because being ginger is shitty enough i would imagine.
peace man...
Its pathetic you consider any of your posts as "rough". You Trump supporting snowflake's thin skin is only outdone by your unfathomable stupidity.
skiermanIts pathetic you consider any of your posts as "rough". You Trump supporting snowflake's thin skin is only outdone by your unfathomable stupidity.
YOUR POSTS ARE ROUGHER THAN THE SAND PAPER DILDOS I USE TO FUCK YOUR MOM WITH.
YOU'RE MORE EDGY THAN THE EXACTO KNIVES USED TO CUT YOURSELF TO RELIEVE THE PAIN OF BEING AN 8-CHAN INCEL TRUMP SUPPORTER WITH SKIN MORE THIN AND WHITE THAN RICE PAPER.
KEEP GOING! WE'RE ALL SO RIVETED BY YOUR SHITTY POSTS.
**This post was edited on Apr 28th 2020 at 8:16:16pm
