Stupid thred

Ski looks mad directional chief...

It's actually pretty stiff. Just get an ARV 106 or a Prodigy 3.0, those are much closer to what you're looking for.

they're stiff as fuck. heavy, and would make a terrible park ski.

Craw_Daddythey're stiff as fuck. heavy, and would make a terrible park ski.

thanks for telling me I'm stupid, I needed that

Craw_Daddythey're stiff as fuck. heavy, and would make a terrible park ski.

It's neither stiff as fuck nor heavy (2000g in 184cm length) but I agree it would be a less than ideal park ski.

People rock the Camox for occasional park laps.

mystery3It's neither stiff as fuck nor heavy (2000g in 184cm length) but I agree it would be a less than ideal park ski.

People rock the Camox for occasional park laps.

Unless they drastically changed their design from 2 years ago I'm gonna have to disagree with you on this one. I have a pair and they are boats. granted I only really rode park skis before that. But if thats all you've ridden then they are stiff and heavy

**This post was edited on May 13th 2019 at 3:57:04pm

I skied them for 3 seasons straight and they are neither stuff as fuck nor heavy as fuck. They are well within the weight range of similar width skis. The rocker is very progressive, meaning that the shovels of the skis are more flexible than underfoot. The design changed last year, with a new recommended mount of -8 from center (before it was -6). The tail has minimal rocker and is stiffer than the nose.

I grew up skiing in Europe and I know a few of the team riders. They ski them everywhere but pretty much there are better options for park skiing. The Camox is a great ski that can work for park, as well as the Captis. The Atris is a great ski and if you really want to you could move the bindings forward and give it a go, but it won’t be as good as when it’s mounted at the recommended. There are better options for park than the Atris, essentially.

animatorI skied them for 3 seasons straight and they are neither stuff as fuck nor heavy as fuck. They are well within the weight range of similar width skis. The rocker is very progressive, meaning that the shovels of the skis are more flexible than underfoot. The design changed last year, with a new recommended mount of -8 from center (before it was -6). The tail has minimal rocker and is stiffer than the nose.

I grew up skiing in Europe and I know a few of the team riders. They ski them everywhere but pretty much there are better options for park skiing. The Camox is a great ski that can work for park, as well as the Captis. The Atris is a great ski and if you really want to you could move the bindings forward and give it a go, but it won’t be as good as when it’s mounted at the recommended. There are better options for park than the Atris, essentially.

Didn't know about the redesign but that explains my thoughts on the current iteration. Very directional feel and stiff through most of the ski. Still a fun ski and one of the best carving mid-fat skis I tried last season. I skied the 189 and they ripped but couldn't imagine skiing them in the park. The Camox would be a fun park ski, light, tons of camber and stupid amount of pop.

mystery3It's neither stiff as fuck nor heavy (2000g in 184cm length) but I agree it would be a less than ideal park ski.

People rock the Camox for occasional park laps.

Can attest to this. I rocked the Camox as a park ski all summer at Hood and had a blast on them. They are pretty stiff which was my only complaint (though thats what makes them nice for all mtn), but those skis were the most durable I’ve ridden out of ON3Ps, vishnus, lines, armada, ect.

Crispy.Can attest to this. I rocked the Camox as a park ski all summer at Hood and had a blast on them. They are pretty stiff which was my only complaint (though thats what makes them nice for all mtn), but those skis were the most durable I’ve ridden out of ON3Ps, vishnus, lines, armada, ect.

what man? the durability on lines are unmatched in the industry

jwillywhat man? the durability on lines are unmatched in the industry

lol