It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Well it wont actually work quite like that. The basic principle of the law is to protect people from copyright infringement but the wording is so vague that people can easily misuse the law for personal gain. Luckily there is still time to change the law itself before it comes in place so all is not lost.
nelesonWell it wont actually work quite like that. The basic principle of the law is to protect people from copyright infringement but the wording is so vague that people can easily misuse the law for personal gain. Luckily there is still time to change the law itself before it comes in place so all is not lost.
But it's game over if youtube and instagram start using copy right filters in EU.
nolliebackflipBut it's game over if youtube and instagram start using copy right filters in EU.
Youtube and Instagram already use copyright filters. If you upload something copyrighted it will be taken down quite fast because of the algorithm they already have in place article 13 wont change that in any way.
nelesonYoutube and Instagram already use copyright filters. If you upload something copyrighted it will be taken down quite fast because of the algorithm they already have in place article 13 wont change that in any way.
Well them filters succ ass cuz they aint working. Also ig will start to filter images
**This post was edited on Mar 27th 2019 at 4:57:56pm
nolliebackflipWell them filters succ ass cuz they aint working. Also ig will start to filter images
**This post was edited on Mar 27th 2019 at 4:57:56pm
Yea tru, youtubes filters do work pretty well tho of instagram i dont know so well. It would suck tho if they filter images from the eu it all depends on how the wording comes out on the final submition of the law. Its scary shit. Hopefully it doesnt obliterate fair use.
so basically IG pages like Downdays would no longer be able to repost a pic or video from any skier, since the filters would take it down.
I don't think that it's going be that way. nobody would have a chance to get pushed in the community (skiing, arts etc.) by big sites and even sponsors would have big problems to promote stuff. there will be some change to article 13
Wouldn't sites with servers outside of the EU not have to worry about any of that? Like wouldn't it be up to the EU to police this? Not like Zucc can be prosecuted for breaking the laws of a nation that facebook has no servers or offices? Like imagine if the US (or any country) banned a singular concept or image from being posted anywhere on the internet cause of terrorism or something. Now what would the US do, ban its citizens from visiting any site that does not heed their demands? I have no idea what I'm talking about and am not familiar with how international copyright law works, but some of this stuff seems pretty hard to enforce unless you're an authoritarian nation such as China, where even then people have relatively easy access to VPN's or proxy's.
FabseMso basically IG pages like Downdays would no longer be able to repost a pic or video from any skier, since the filters would take it down.
I don't think that it's going be that way. nobody would have a chance to get pushed in the community (skiing, arts etc.) by big sites and even sponsors would have big problems to promote stuff. there will be some change to article 13
Its not like everything will be copy striked the person who owns the material will still have to claim the uploaded content so ski edits and shit will be mostly fine
nelesonIts not like everything will be copy striked the person who owns the material will still have to claim the uploaded content so ski edits and shit will be mostly fine
how I understood, they will inform the owner and if he doesn't consent, then it won't be uploaded. since 99% of amateur vids contain licensed music it's going to be interesting
eheathYes you can, it's how many creators on YouTube generate content, using fair use.
Ok, imagine you're a songwriter, or a composer, you've spent many days/weeks working on a tune and then someone on Youtube uses your song and makes $1000 with their video. Yet you made absolutely ZERO dollar because they claimed it was "faire use". See where the problem is?
Fair use is not something you can throw on the table whenever you don't want to pay for something. It has specific rules, and that's also why copyright free music exists.
BrawnTrendsOk, imagine you're a songwriter, or a composer, you've spent many days/weeks working on a tune and then someone on Youtube uses your song and makes $1000 with their video. Yet you made absolutely ZERO dollar because they claimed it was "faire use". See where the problem is?
Fair use is not something you can throw on the table whenever you don't want to pay for something. It has specific rules, and that's also why copyright free music exists.
Fair use doesnt work like that. U really cant make money with a video with somebodys song on it or at least youtube is trying to reduce that. Article 13 is gonna make all the content with copyrighted material on it impossible to upload to YT even though you didnt make money with it.
nolliebackflipFair use doesnt work like that. U really cant make money with a video with somebodys song on it or at least youtube is trying to reduce that.
That's what I'm saying.
nolliebackflipArticle 13 is gonna make all the content with copyrighted material on it impossible to upload to YT even though you didnt make money with it.
We'll see. I think there is a lot of psychose around that whole Article 13.
