Member of the Month

partyandBS
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Keep skis skinny

profile picture
lordlugnuts
Posts: 17 - Karma: 429
Wax companies are the puppeteer behind ski businesses, the wider the ski the more wax used. 60 mm underfoot snowblades should put Swix and other wax companies out of business.

**This thread was edited on Mar 1st 2019 at 9:38:33pm
Mar 1 2019 9:32PM
19 4
profile picture
270on420out
Posts: 7518 - Karma: 51,236
On a serious note, can we please get more rockered park skis under 90 underfoot?
Mar 1 2019 9:35PM
13 19
profile picture
Cryptno
Posts: 176 - Karma: -11
DIRTYBUBBLEOn a serious note, can we please get more rockered park skis under 90 underfoot?


That's sounds like one of the dumbest ideas i have ever heard. I see it
with on3p and it looks kind of gimmicky, the best rationale I could find on their website was "it makes it more fun". IDK man, does it make it that mush easier for butters? Doesn't throwing a whole bunch of rocker in skinny skis make them hella unstable, theoretically you are reducing the amount of ski on the ground at any given point.
Mar 1 2019 11:13PM
8 9
profile picture
BJ2112
Posts: 130 - Karma: 442
lol imagine waxing skis
Mar 1 2019 11:24PM
19 2
profile picture
TRVP_ANGEL
Posts: 12534 - Karma: 116,689
Wouldn't wax companies be trying to get people to snowboard then? that's like twice the amount of wax.
Mar 1 2019 11:42PM
19 2
profile picture
TheClap.
Posts: 21674 - Karma: 4,176
DIRTYBUBBLEOn a serious note, can we please get more rockered park skis under 90 underfoot?


This
Mar 2 2019 12:27AM
3 7
profile picture
Dunderflip
Posts: 535 - Karma: 2,449
CryptnoThat's sounds like one of the dumbest ideas i have ever heard. "it makes it more fun". IDK man,


why do you even go skiing dude
Mar 2 2019 3:42AM
10 0
profile picture
Ted_The_Sled
Posts: 18 - Karma: 281
Don't fat-shame my skis
Mar 2 2019 1:33PM
18 0
profile picture
DildoSwaggins
Posts: 39 - Karma: 83
TRVP_ANGELWouldn't wax companies be trying to get people to snowboard then? that's like twice the amount of wax.


Who brings logic to a ski forum? Get out of here with your clear and concise reasoning
Mar 2 2019 2:18PM
8 0
profile picture
Biffbarf
Posts: 6797 - Karma: 72,689
Mogul ski master race
Mar 2 2019 2:23PM
0 0
profile picture
270on420out
Posts: 7518 - Karma: 51,236
CryptnoThat's sounds like one of the dumbest ideas i have ever heard. I see it
with on3p and it looks kind of gimmicky, the best rationale I could find on their website was "it makes it more fun". IDK man, does it make it that mush easier for butters? Doesn't throwing a whole bunch of rocker in skinny skis make them hella unstable, theoretically you are reducing the amount of ski on the ground at any given point.


Yeah but I like skinny skis with a tight turning radius and low swing weight. Camber is boring as fuck and has no discernible advantages aside from carving. The few rockered Park skis that are under 90 are popular on the market. See: Vishnu wets, ON3P magnus’, moment vices, Armada alpha xs/halo
Mar 2 2019 8:03PM
2 0
profile picture
Rparr
Posts: 5631 - Karma: 46,929
DIRTYBUBBLEYeah but I like skinny skis with a tight turning radius and low swing weight. Camber is boring as fuck and has no discernible advantages aside from carving. The few rockered Park skis that are under 90 are popular on the market. See: Vishnu wets, ON3P magnus’, moment vices, Armada alpha xs/halo


I loved the old armada halos, but those are extinct. That line became the bdog which turned into a much heavier and wider ski. I'm on the magnus now and it reminds me of the old halos in some ways
Mar 2 2019 8:57PM
0 0
profile picture
T-ROB
Posts: 252 - Karma: 649
RparrI loved the old armada halos, but those are extinct. That line became the bdog which turned into a much heavier and wider ski. I'm on the magnus now and it reminds me of the old halos in some ways


I had 2 pairs of these and they were AMAZING. Not recommended for moguls
Mar 2 2019 11:58PM
0 0
profile picture
Cryptno
Posts: 176 - Karma: -11
DIRTYBUBBLEYeah but I like skinny skis with a tight turning radius and low swing weight. Camber is boring as fuck and has no discernible advantages aside from carving. The few rockered Park skis that are under 90 are popular on the market. See: Vishnu wets, ON3P magnus’, moment vices, Armada alpha xs/halo


I completely agree except on the skinny part. I'm not sure how stable they are on powder but pescados pretty much are all of the above except they are fat.
Mar 3 2019 12:46AM
0 1
profile picture
Lemuel
Posts: 14509 - Karma: 10,783
I would love a mid 80's width full rockered ski. I not talking rocker out the ass tip and tail, I'm talking ever so slight full rocker like Volkl used to do on the bridge and mantra. I love the way a full rocker ski feels, so easy to pivot. Medium flex core and add some metal in and it will be the perfect park ski for me.
Mar 3 2019 8:32AM
1 0
profile picture
powpatrol
Posts: 1709 - Karma: 11,064
TRVP_ANGELWouldn't wax companies be trying to get people to snowboard then? that's like twice the amount of wax.


how much did u pay eheath to be a red name? Jealous

**This post was edited on Mar 3rd 2019 at 8:45:05am
Mar 3 2019 8:44AM
1 0
profile picture
Johngreenacre
Posts: 626 - Karma: 4,557
I don't even know anymore. I've skied a bunch of different types of park skis and honestly it all just depends on how you like to ski. everyone will find the type of ski that works best for them. comp skiers need stiff thin and light, those sort of in between comp and video skiers like joona ferdi Antti want something in between and new wave rippers like cal Carson want something really playful. just ski the ski that's best for you and don't just follow the industry/community trends.
Mar 3 2019 10:29AM
1 0
profile picture
DrZoidberg
Posts: 5675 - Karma: 4,269
Can you even buy an 85mm full camber 19-20m turn radius park ski anymore? Like an old line chronic or troublemakers or any of the salomon skis from that time period?

I still vote for more tight turn radius skinny park skis, like 16m or so, 90mm max but I'd be down with 85. Half the people saying they need (note that need is not the same as want) a longer radius and fat skis for stability or not hooking up on landings are kidding themselves. Also there's not even any room to make use of a long urn radius here, or enough snow to make a big jump. Give me that sweet 16m, 85mm waist ski for gaper slalom.
Mar 3 2019 8:21PM
1 0
profile picture
iced
Posts: 3070 - Karma: 17,980
big is beautiful
Mar 3 2019 8:38PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)