Member of the Month

partyandBS
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

GH5, A7III or something else?

profile picture
.HERO
Posts: 479 - Karma: 3,676
Hey all, I'm looking to upgrade my camera to either the GH5 or the A7III. I currently shoot on a Sony a6300, and primarily use my Sigma 18-35 f1.8, so switching systems isn't that big of a deal because I will get an adapter for the GH5.

I primarily shoot weddings, so I love the idea of the 10 bit 4:2:2 of the GH5, and the IBIS is incredible as it will save my arms from dying of heavy lifting using a gimbal (still will use one but a great feature). I also love the 4K 60fps feature. Does the GH5 shoot 10 bit 4:2:2 internally in 4K 60fps?I'm just nervous about the lowlight primarily as well as the autofocus. I have been waiting for the a7siii to drop but we all know how that works.

I love my sony a6300, but I am needing to upgrade to something a little more professional and versatile. Would you guys recommend one over the other, or something else entirely? My price range is about $2500 for the body, but anything less would be great and I could spend the rest on glass.

Thanks for the insight and let me know if you need more info!
POLL
Edit Poll
Votes:

Take care when editing a poll; Options should be similar to maintain vote integrity.

More options will be added automatically as you type. You must supply a question and at least two options. No HTML is allowed.

Mar 1 2019 3:45PM
2 0
profile picture
.HERO
Posts: 479 - Karma: 3,676
Also I just realized there was another thread on this created 10 months ago, but still curious on your thoughts in this situation. Thanks!
Mar 1 2019 3:52PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61719 - Karma: 124,353
If you're mostly shooting weddings, I'd say a7 for sure. GH5 is fantastic for skiing, but i could see it struggling in some low light situations.
Mar 3 2019 1:21AM
1 0
profile picture
Pataguccimane
Posts: 551 - Karma: 1,199
For weddings idk if you could beat the a7iii. I definitely agree with eheath as I’m a big Panasonic guy and love my gh4 for everything skiing/action related and despite the gh5 having that better color science and slightly better low light performance than the gh4 it still probably won’t cut it if you primarily shoot weddings/low light stuff when you compare it to how the a7 will perform in those situations.
Mar 4 2019 1:34PM
1 0
profile picture
CluckaChuck
Posts: 1541 - Karma: 734
Hey dude - I've been using the GH5 as my primary for about a year and a half now. The camera is an absolute beast for wedding videography. You're right to assume the IBS will come in handy. I was shooting a wedding last fall and my gimble failed to work, the video turned out great regardless. I would suggest buying the GH5 S it has some upgraded perks that the regular GH5 doesn't, including better low light performance which will make a huge difference, especially if you are shooting weddings because the receptions can be pretty dark. I upgraded from a Canon 6D but kept the body as a backup and bought an adapter for my GH5 so I can still use all of my Canon lenses. Another really cool feature is the ability to shoot in 180FPS, you can get some fantastic slow-mo footage. PM if you have any questions.
Mar 6 2019 9:22AM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61719 - Karma: 124,353
CluckaChuckHey dude - I've been using the GH5 as my primary for about a year and a half now. The camera is an absolute beast for wedding videography. You're right to assume the IBS will come in handy. I was shooting a wedding last fall and my gimble failed to work, the video turned out great regardless. I would suggest buying the GH5 S it has some upgraded perks that the regular GH5 doesn't, including better low light performance which will make a huge difference, especially if you are shooting weddings because the receptions can be pretty dark. I upgraded from a Canon 6D but kept the body as a backup and bought an adapter for my GH5 so I can still use all of my Canon lenses. Another really cool feature is the ability to shoot in 180FPS, you can get some fantastic slow-mo footage. PM if you have any questions.


just FYI OP the GH5s does not have IBIS.
Mar 6 2019 2:11PM
0 0
profile picture
CluckaChuck
Posts: 1541 - Karma: 734
eheathjust FYI OP the GH5s does not have IBIS.


Unless I am using the wrong acronym IBIS stands for In-Body Image Stabilization correct? Because the GH5 does have an in-Body stabilization. Or is it just the GH5s that doesn't have it? That would be weird.

**This post was edited on Mar 6th 2019 at 3:16:25pm

**This post was edited on Mar 6th 2019 at 3:17:22pm
Mar 6 2019 3:15PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61719 - Karma: 124,353
CluckaChuckUnless I am using the wrong acronym IBIS stands for In-Body Image Stabilization correct? Because the GH5 does have an in-Body stabilization. Or is it just the GH5s that doesn't have it? That would be weird.

**This post was edited on Mar 6th 2019 at 3:16:25pm

**This post was edited on Mar 6th 2019 at 3:17:22pm


Yes, GH5 has an IS system in the body, the GH5s does not.
Mar 6 2019 3:40PM
1 0
profile picture
Hangry
Posts: 156 - Karma: 713
You could budget it and go for a G9 if it gets tight. It's essentially the gh5's nephew made for outdoor and rough use with a decent low-light sensor, check the specs https://cameradecision.com/compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-GH5-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DC-G9

**This post was edited on Mar 19th 2019 at 2:59:31pm
Mar 19 2019 2:58PM
0 1
profile picture
noah_jaff3
Posts: 294 - Karma: 284
PataguccimaneFor weddings idk if you could beat the a7iii. I definitely agree with eheath as I’m a big Panasonic guy and love my gh4 for everything skiing/action related and despite the gh5 having that better color science and slightly better low light performance than the gh4 it still probably won’t cut it if you primarily shoot weddings/low light stuff when you compare it to how the a7 will perform in those situations.


What do you use for followcams on your gh4? how do you get stable shots
Apr 12 2019 6:01PM
0 0
profile picture
Pataguccimane
Posts: 551 - Karma: 1,199
noah_jaff3What do you use for followcams on your gh4? how do you get stable shots


I usually just go with my glidecam, sometimes a ronin m but that’s a lot of weight for skiing around filming my buddy’s all day.
Apr 12 2019 6:05PM
0 0
profile picture
corona
Posts: 12816 - Karma: 32,954
If you're still searching and have the $$, check out the new Panasonic. Pretty much the best of all worlds for videography.
Aug 27 2019 7:02PM
0 0
profile picture
VT_scratch
Posts: 8805 - Karma: 6,341
VinnieFIf you're still searching and have the $$, check out the new Panasonic. Pretty much the best of all worlds for videography.


the new panasonic what? S-series? A pain to switch to the new glass system though. Though I'm not sure if there are adapters for other glass or what the deal with that is yet, But yeah they just announced a new 6k full frame with IBIS.
Aug 28 2019 12:24PM
0 0
profile picture
davetron78
Posts: 531 - Karma: 1,118
GH5 GH5 GH5
Aug 28 2019 3:09PM
0 0
profile picture
860media*
Posts: 1575 - Karma: 10,519
been rocking the Gh5 and Gh5s now for a while and loving it! obv still use a panasonic hvx200 for those servo zooms people love
Nov 8 2019 9:58AM
0 0
profile picture
GANDALF
Posts: 6304 - Karma: 6,599
If you shoot weddings a lot, i would definitely opt for the GH5s. Much better performance in low light situations (dinner/receptions). You will be fine without ibis. A few panasonic lenses have IS built into it, so you could always pick up a couple of those. the 35-100 f 2.8 is killer, and has IS.
Nov 15 2019 5:42PM
0 0
profile picture
chris.goodhue
Posts: 946 - Karma: 6,209
Been rocking the GH5 for the last 5 months or so.

Killer camera, great for run and gun shooting and has some great features. My only complaint is the auto focus and low light performance. Even with my native lenses for the gh5, the auto focus does not compare to my previous Canons I've shot with. In low light I could definitely see the Sony being a better option.

Either way they are both sick cameras, but if I were to do it agin I'd go Sony.
Nov 25 2019 5:28PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)