Monsieur_PatateHe edited and removed his post because he has confidence issues, but basically he was saying it annoys him to see skis larger than >112 underfoot with entry level bindings like M10s. It keeps him up at night.
That's kind of funny that he cares about the width of the ski as the criteria for caring about binding din. So everything less than 112mm is OK lol? Maybe he just doesn't like the aesthetics of it.
OP, just an FYI... Not everyone needs to rock dins at 18 when they're skiing. Many people do just fine with a properly adjusted binding to their recommended din based on the chart, ability aside. So it makes perfect sense for someone to save money by going with a cheaper binding with a lower din range such as m10.
