Restless — An Alex Hall Portrait (Full Film) | Faction Skis

Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Pros and Cons of longer skis for park

profile picture
willthompsonn
Posts: 8 - Karma: 35
Hi,

I am 5'8 and have a pair of 178cm line blends to ski on this year. I was wondering the pros and cons of a longer ski for park. ALL HELP IS WELCOMED AND NEEDED.

THANKS
Nov 6 2018 12:06AM
5 0
profile picture
Mr.Bishop
Posts: 22708 - Karma: 76,635
willthompsonnHi,

I am 5'8 and have a pair of 178cm line blends to ski on this year. I was wondering the pros and cons of a longer ski for park. ALL HELP IS WELCOMED AND NEEDED.

THANKS


Swing weight is a big thing here. If you're going to be skiing primarily east coast / midwest rope-tow resorts where you're shredding rails all day... then doing a 450 off of a really small flat rail isn't going to be as easy on longer skis.

There's likely more too, but that is the biggest one off the top of my head.
Nov 6 2018 9:07AM
3 0
profile picture
GrandThings
Posts: 3133 - Karma: 31,615
Cons: Swing weight
Pros: Look (much) cooler
Nov 6 2018 9:27AM
31 0
profile picture
skiP.E.I.
Posts: 7822 - Karma: 21,855
Longer skis are better for big landings, skiing fast, buttering (more ski to bend) and are going to help you more skiing pow. It's going to be a little harder to whip your skis around for switch-ups and fast spins, but not impossible. You'll get used to them in no time.
Nov 6 2018 10:36AM
9 0
profile picture
Pat.t
Posts: 246 - Karma: 2,023
ImO a longer ski will teach you better form because you can't really cheat tricks on rails.
Nov 6 2018 10:42AM
19 2
profile picture
skiguy04
Posts: 1597 - Karma: 1,116
Haven’t tried short skis but my 185’s do everything
Nov 6 2018 2:19PM
2 0
profile picture
Dlonetti
Posts: 1773 - Karma: 18,330
In enjoy watching rail edits with dudes with longer skis wayyy more than super tight spins on 165 skis

for example
https://www.instagram.com/p/BoiBXiahWuk/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet long

compared to people riding the typical 169 volkl revolts

**This post was edited on Nov 6th 2018 at 2:25:38pm
Nov 6 2018 2:22PM
4 0
profile picture
TRVP_ANGEL
Posts: 12506 - Karma: 116,131
use to ski longer taller than me, really helped on jumps cause honestly you can land with a large MoE but rail game suffers
Nov 6 2018 2:44PM
2 0
profile picture
SofaKingSick
Posts: 9292 - Karma: 60,989
you'll be great on those, those are soft, easy to use skis and they have some rocker too

only downside is weight but we're talking minuscule difference here, honestly hardly worth mentioning


generally longer skis are more stable, better for landings, and better in soft snow
Nov 6 2018 2:52PM
3 0
profile picture
The.Fish
Posts: 2269 - Karma: 4,988
I clip my tips and tails on rails a lot more when spinning out of them. This may just be me and my lack of ability to maneuver on rails. The line blend is very soft so sizing up can't hurt if you plan on going fast or big.
Nov 6 2018 3:08PM
2 0
profile picture
first_rodeo
Posts: 2385 - Karma: 7,781
am 5'4 and have used 180's since early 2000's, still can throw around 270's and alien grinds.
Nov 6 2018 4:27PM
3 0
profile picture
bigcat.
Posts: 92 - Karma: 767
Pros: Everything

Cons: Nothing


Pros for short skis: Chuck tricks as fast as possible to land insane tricks

Cons: No one respects you.
Nov 6 2018 4:32PM
21 0
profile picture
skiguy04
Posts: 1597 - Karma: 1,116
Nose taps and tail taps be more legitimate
Nov 7 2018 5:15PM
0 0
profile picture
DirtYStylE
Posts: 3652 - Karma: 8,888
Pros: heavier, so they are more stable. Pros use longer skis

Cons: heavier, which means beginners will have a hard time whippin
Nov 7 2018 5:41PM
1 0
profile picture
Cole9
Posts: 339 - Karma: 741
DirtYStylEPros: heavier, so they are more stable. Pros use longer skis

Cons: heavier, which means beginners will have a hard time whippin


False, have you seen Jesper Tjaders skis???
Nov 7 2018 9:03PM
1 0
profile picture
bleevus
Posts: 1308 - Karma: 2,048
Cole9False, have you seen Jesper Tjaders skis???


he stole those 164s off a 12 year old
Nov 8 2018 10:11AM
8 0
profile picture
Lonely
Posts: 6741 - Karma: 61,668
Harder tricks are harder, easier tricks look cooler, your all mountain abilities will improve.
Nov 8 2018 1:01PM
0 0
profile picture
saskyskier71
Posts: 123 - Karma: 434
I'm the same height and I ride the same ski for my park ski. I like it because there's a lot of ski to carve on and a lot of ski to land on. only con would be tight spins for rails I guess. but I really like the overall feel of the 178's
Nov 8 2018 3:41PM
1 0
profile picture
willthompsonn
Posts: 8 - Karma: 35
Thanks so much to everyone!
Nov 12 2018 11:40PM
1 0
profile picture
skiguy04
Posts: 1597 - Karma: 1,116
And centre mount
Nov 13 2018 12:15AM
1 0
profile picture
lil.Boye
Posts: 2648 - Karma: 12,030
way more stable on a longer ski. many complain about railgame, but when you get used to it you will be able to do all your rail tricks without any problem.
Nov 13 2018 4:57AM
0 0
profile picture
SofaKingSick
Posts: 9292 - Karma: 60,989
skiguy04And centre mount


this is a helpful point-- if youre worried about them being long on you, you can mount the binding up a little bit, maybe even center mount, which can be seen as somewhat analogous to choking up on a baseball bat that's too big for you (cause less of the length will be in front of your toe)
Nov 13 2018 10:16AM
1 0
profile picture
skiguy04
Posts: 1597 - Karma: 1,116
The swing is decent with centre mount
Nov 13 2018 12:26PM
0 0
profile picture
Dlonetti
Posts: 1773 - Karma: 18,330
Im 5'11'' and rode my 183 vishnu wides for the first time this past weekend and absolutely loved them the skis are taller than me but I had no trouble spinning and swapping
Nov 13 2018 1:48PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)