Replying to K2 Domain 174 vs 179

Hi all,

I was wondering what size would better for the k2 Domain, 174 or 179.
I've skied on 179 k2 sights and they seemed fine but i know K2 sizes are usually about 3-4"cm longer then advertised on some skis and I'm coming off a torn PCL and broken Tibula from late spring. SO I was thinking the 174 skis might be better for this season for park since my leg strength isn't fully back and most likely won't be.

These will be my main park skis and I plan to ski about 70% rails (all sizes) and 30% jumps(med jumps from 25'-45' and some large but nothing bigger then 55'). If they hold up well (roughly 20x on them) I plan to use them again season and should ne healthier.

i have 179 powder skis and have a old set of 179 park skis that will be used for early/rock/mud season so it seems to make sense just to get the 179 but with my leg strength and k2 skis being a little larger that 174 would feel better for my leg.

Im 5'9" and 150lbs and mid 20s

**This thread was edited on Nov 25th 2017 at 10:20:27pm

**This thread was edited on Nov 25th 2017 at 10:21:38pm