A quick word on blocking ads
It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
oxicleanI think the Nomad 95 replaced it.
CadenmcculloughThe nomad 95 is a little different than the da'nollie. Little stiffer and not symmetrical.
oneill_seanAlso wider
GabbleVowNo, same width. The Da'Nollies were 95mm
oneill_seanI thought they were 90 underfoot
oneill_seanI thought they were 90 underfoot
CadenmcculloughThe nomad 95 is a little different than the da'nollie. Little stiffer and not symmetrical.
jmellberg800first the filthy riches now the da'nollie. Why do ski companies not want riders on symmetrical skis?!?!
#conspiraski
parkplaygroundasymmetrical skis are just better to ski on. I have symmetrical skis right now since I like how they feel, but asymmetrical planks ride better based on body geometry when you are switch. Why would you have want something to ski the same way forward and switch if you stand differently forward vs switch?
jmellberg800thats exactly what they want you to think, im sorry but you have been indoctrinated.
#conspiraski
GabbleVowI don't know about that. What he says has some sense. I am more comfortable riding switch on my asym race skis than on my centered sym park skis. I can still ski switch on my park skis, but I find myself running into more problems on my park skis. Just sayin
jmellberg800Thats where they get you. By the time you have reached a conclusion like that by thinking logically and rationally its already to late. You have to stay 3 steps a head by thinking irationally and close minded. Thats how you trip these companies up. Im on to you on3p and icelantic just you wait.
#conspiraski
