Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
DorianFComing from a guy who owns and uses both I would say buy a glidecam.
The gimbal is awesome, it gets really smooth shots, and allows you to rig out the camera a little easier than a glidecam does (ie external monitor and external sound equipment) but what you dont realize is how heavy the thing is. Depending on what I have attached to the gimbal it weighs 20-30 lbs in total. And you really cant put it down anywhere unless your carrying the stand around. I would consider myself reasonably fit and even still after an hour or two with a gimbal I am extremely tired. I now use a vest, which solves the weight problem, but try getting on a chairlift with it...
Also with a gimbal it is almost impossible to operate without an external monitor of some kind.
Gimbals have a learning curve almost as steep as that of a glidecam. you still have to balance it. you still need to learn how to set it up, and you need to learn about what settings are optimal to ensure that you can keep the skier in the frame. It is far from grab and go
at -30C gimbals dont work. its slow to respond, your lucky if your screen actually has enough battery to stay on, and you need to carry a ton of extra batteries. glidecam's work in all temperatures.
when you compare the smoothness of the footage there is almost no contest between the gimbal and the glidecam. the gimbal blows it out of the water, but it costs 4x as much, and takes longer to setup. plus it is not near as easy to get up lifts.
if you already owned the glidecam, the gimbal is awesome. But if you dont, get the glidecam, learn the tool, and then see if you can live with its (very minimal) limitations before you invest in a gimbal.
eheathTBH gimbals almost look too stable at times, a glidecam introduces a very, very small amount of error which I think is better. Being 'perfect' isnt always the answer, this is a very true thing in skiing and in any filmmaking.
Ascent_Cinemathis it true, they look more organic
eheathIt's funny, I was watching the newest top gear and they put this sort of idea into a perfect statement about cars, you can't bond with something that doesn't have flaws, because as humans we are inherently flawed in some way. If something is "perfect" we can't relate to it, but if something has human qualities I.E. not perfect, we are much more likely to adhere to it.
DorianFComing from a guy who owns and uses both I would say buy a glidecam.
The gimbal is awesome, it gets really smooth shots, and allows you to rig out the camera a little easier than a glidecam does (ie external monitor and external sound equipment) but what you dont realize is how heavy the thing is. Depending on what I have attached to the gimbal it weighs 20-30 lbs in total. And you really cant put it down anywhere unless your carrying the stand around. I would consider myself reasonably fit and even still after an hour or two with a gimbal I am extremely tired. I now use a vest, which solves the weight problem, but try getting on a chairlift with it...
Also with a gimbal it is almost impossible to operate without an external monitor of some kind.
Gimbals have a learning curve almost as steep as that of a glidecam. you still have to balance it. you still need to learn how to set it up, and you need to learn about what settings are optimal to ensure that you can keep the skier in the frame. It is far from grab and go
at -30C gimbals dont work. its slow to respond, your lucky if your screen actually has enough battery to stay on, and you need to carry a ton of extra batteries. glidecam's work in all temperatures.
when you compare the smoothness of the footage there is almost no contest between the gimbal and the glidecam. the gimbal blows it out of the water, but it costs 4x as much, and takes longer to setup. plus it is not near as easy to get up lifts.
if you already owned the glidecam, the gimbal is awesome. But if you dont, get the glidecam, learn the tool, and then see if you can live with its (very minimal) limitations before you invest in a gimbal.
eheathTBH gimbals almost look too stable at times, a glidecam introduces a very, very small amount of error which I think is better. Being 'perfect' isnt always the answer, this is a very true thing in skiing and in any filmmaking.
Ascent_Cinemathis it true, they look more organic