Mar-OThanks for some great input. I fully agree the need for adapters with the new macbook sucks and I don't really care about the touch bar so I might look into the 2015 model again if I can get it at a good discount now. It dosent seem like they sell refurbished macs in Norway so I think I would have to buy a brand new one and so far the price difference with the new compared to the old dosent seem very big. Very interesting if most power gain on the new one compared to the 2015 will first come if you upgrade to the 460 graphic card if thats not important for video editing. Do you think the new prosessor will make a bigger difference or is it expected to be fairly similar to the old one for video work?
Also what is peoples experience only going with the 256GB hard drive, since I will be working off external hard drives when editing anyways I can't really see much reason to upgrade?
Even if its not through Apple I'm sure you can find a 2015 15" w/ dGPU for a discount at a 3rd party seller in Norway thats trying to empty out their stock for the new one. I'm not sure how much better the processor will be but Intel hasn't really made big advancements performance wise, like the AMD card in these macs its all about efficiency so it'll use a bit less power for the same performance. As far as 256 or bigger goes, I "had" to get 512gb in my 2015 since they don't sell one with a dGPU for any lower but now that I have that I would never want to go back. I edit off externals too but for on the go once I know I have all the footage/files needed for a project I load it onto the internal SSD and it definitely speeds up loading things while editing a little since the rMBP SSDs are stupid fast. The 2016 model has even faster storage so it'd be a shame to not be able to utilize that to the fullest
ICaryAs a Film Major, I built an iMac
what?
ICaryWhen I edit on the iMac versus my macbook pro I am so calm and relaxed because I never have issues with anything or long ass rendering times. My iMac halls ass and never gets the rainbow wheel of death and export/rendering times are literally 100% faster. Plus a desktop is cheaper and you get way better internals.
Are you comparing a new iMac with a 13" MBP which none have a dGPU? Theres a huuuge range of MBP and quite a lot that shouldn't even be called "Pro" in the first place. My 2015 MBP "halls ass and never gets the rainbow wheel of death and export/rendering times are literally 100% faster", that sentence means nothing until you say exactly what you are comparing to.
if you compare geek bench results between the 2.8ghz 2015 MBP and 5KiMac with the top spec 4ghz chip they are extremely similar except, slight edge going to the iMac in single core and to the MBP in multicore, which is useful for video editing. For graphics neither are too impressive since they're macs and apple refuses to use top end GPUs for power reasons, and even though the iMac is a desktop it uses a laptop GPU. And that laptop GPU is pushing almost twice the pixels of the rMBP in the 5KiMac which definitely impacts performance, the 21.5" 4K iMac doesn't even have a damn GPU haha.
ICaryPlus a desktop is cheaper and you get way better internals. Also its nicer to work on a larger monitor and start to build a workstation if you are going to become a true editor. Just my .02
The iMac that competes with the high end 2015 MBP is $3.2k, 3.6k if you opt for 32gb of ram instead of 16 to match the MBP. I can't find the top end MBP price since apple doesn't sell it anymore but I believe it was $3.2-3.4k. So pretty damn similar real world performance, one you can take with you everywhere, and one that has a beautiful 5K display without the true graphics power it needs to drive it efficiently.
Plus I'd argue that plugging in a MBP to a monitor/dock is more of a "workstation" than an iMac, where the only thing that you can change once its been bought is the ram. Laptop + monitor at home gives you all the comfort/screen real estate of a desktop, and when you need to go you can actually take your work with you. And you can use an eGPU over thunderbolt 2/3, which opens up even more possibilities.
A PC desktop would have a ridiculously better cost:performance ratio which would actually be "cheaper with better internals" like you said, but then you have a windows computer that sits stationary on a desk which not everyone is thrilled about
also the iMac lineup hasn't been refreshed in 384 days, so fuck paying full price for that