Member of the Month

partyandBS
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Newschoolers should buy k2

profile picture
MACK.
Posts: 1230 - Karma: 1,892
We should all join forces and buy K2
Then we can all be sponsered :))))))
Oct 6 2016 8:15PM
2 1
profile picture
Swandog7
Posts: 4955 - Karma: 9,023
IF we didnt buy NS Mountain i don't know why we would buy K2. God I wish we had that mountain
Oct 6 2016 9:10PM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
I thought they made spice illegal.
Oct 6 2016 9:46PM
0 0
profile picture
Holte
Posts: 10742 - Karma: 7,819
RudyGarmischI thought they made spice illegal.


Are we talking about Dune?
Oct 7 2016 1:14AM
0 0
profile picture
Rockhound
Posts: 3432 - Karma: 851
K2>smithlimo>nsmountian
Oct 7 2016 1:24AM
0 0
profile picture
KENDOZER
Posts: 408 - Karma: 1,147
lol, like ns makes any money
Oct 7 2016 8:44AM
0 0
profile picture
SofaKingSick
Posts: 9346 - Karma: 61,390
naw they called the uber and paid for the last round last night, ill pick up the tab on this one
Oct 7 2016 9:44AM
0 0
profile picture
Young_patty
Posts: 3291 - Karma: 38,154
MACK.We should all join forces and buy K2
Then we can all be sponsered :))))))


God have mercy on your soul
Oct 7 2016 12:20PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr.Bishop
Posts: 22708 - Karma: 76,635
MACK.We should all join forces and buy K2
Then we can all be sponsered :))))))


It would actually be a terrible idea for us to buy a hardgoods brand. It would put us in competition with all of the people who advertise... plus there's nobody at our company who has any idea how to run a ski brand.

Swandog7IF we didnt buy NS Mountain i don't know why we would buy K2. God I wish we had that mountain


You and me both bud. Big capital expendature though, hard to justify for real.
Oct 7 2016 12:21PM
0 0
profile picture
skierman
Posts: 8382 - Karma: 7,758
If they can hardly pay for their own original content, what makes you think they can buy a ski company?
Oct 7 2016 5:36PM
0 0
profile picture
hoodcrew
Posts: 1002 - Karma: 69,638
KENDOZERlol, like ns makes any money


You would be suprised. NS is a fuckin cash cow, the parent company just takes all the money and doesn't invest much back into the site
Oct 7 2016 6:26PM
0 0
profile picture
1KSheehan
Posts: 119 - Karma: 181
hoodcrewYou would be suprised. NS is a fuckin cash cow, the parent company just takes all the money and doesn't invest much back into the site


Who's the parent company?
Oct 7 2016 7:17PM
0 0
profile picture
hoodcrew
Posts: 1002 - Karma: 69,638
1KSheehanWho's the parent company?


Ten, aka the enthusiasts network
Oct 7 2016 8:15PM
0 0
profile picture
1KSheehan
Posts: 119 - Karma: 181
hoodcrewTen, aka the enthusiasts network


wow, http://www.enthusiastnetwork.com/ have a mini monopoly on various sites, that I thought where owned by inderviduels. well you learn somthing new everyday.
Oct 8 2016 4:08AM
0 0
profile picture
hoodcrew
Posts: 1002 - Karma: 69,638
1KSheehanwow, http://www.enthusiastnetwork.com/ have a mini monopoly on various sites, that I thought where owned by inderviduels. well you learn somthing new everyday.


Yeah I would be interested to hear bishop break it down for us, from what I was told this summer by a very reputable industry source NS pulls down about 4-600 K a month in advertisements, clearly not much of that money is going back into the site, imagine if even a small fraction of that was going back to producers who release content solely on NS? The quality of the edits you are seeing right now would go thru the roof.
Oct 8 2016 6:44PM
0 0
profile picture
1KSheehan
Posts: 119 - Karma: 181
hoodcrewYeah I would be interested to hear bishop break it down for us, from what I was told this summer by a very reputable industry source NS pulls down about 4-600 K a month in advertisements, clearly not much of that money is going back into the site, imagine if even a small fraction of that was going back to producers who release content solely on NS? The quality of the edits you are seeing right now would go thru the roof.


Damm, imagine if even 25% of that got funded back into this site the improvements they could make would be huge and they could also support as you said more producers which would be a great thing for the NS community. Fuck we should have definitely bought that Smith Optic Limo.
Oct 9 2016 3:13AM
0 0
profile picture
skierman
Posts: 8382 - Karma: 7,758
hoodcrewYeah I would be interested to hear bishop break it down for us, from what I was told this summer by a very reputable industry source NS pulls down about 4-600 K a month in advertisements, clearly not much of that money is going back into the site, imagine if even a small fraction of that was going back to producers who release content solely on NS? The quality of the edits you are seeing right now would go thru the roof.


Yeah well its a big reason why NS is dying out. They have/had the most visited website for freeskiing but did nothing to take advantage of that. Why go on here when you can get constant quality edits elsewhere like SLVSH instead of one good edit followed up by 10 mediocre or boring edits like here on NS.

One great example of a site not being run idiotically is Pinkbike.com. They were just like NS 10-15 years ago but now they're one of the most trafficked action sports websites on the web. This is largely due to the fact they invest back into the community and invest in quality writers and shredders to make edits. NS needs to hop off the "here's hoping for free killer content" idea but someone felt the need to cash out and sell NS off to whichever parent company would pay the most regardless of their managing ideas so its probably too late.
Oct 9 2016 12:24PM
0 0
profile picture
Deepskier
Posts: 3267 - Karma: 4,832
Oct 9 2016 12:28PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)