Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
eheathBut he rotated at least 720 degrees, he did two flips.
In b4 everyone tells me I'm wrong. It's fucking science, a rodeo 5 is a flip and a 180, 360 degree flip plus 180 spin = 540 degrees of rotation. He does two flips, just because spins the opposite way he sets doesn't subtract a complete 180 degrees of rotation from the trick.
That being said, this trick is fucking sick and dean killed it so hard at wcs. I'm not entirely sure what to call this trick, but double flip 540 doesn't make any sense, at all.
eheathBut he rotated at least 720 degrees, he did two flips.
In b4 everyone tells me I'm wrong. It's fucking science, a rodeo 5 is a flip and a 180, 360 degree flip plus 180 spin = 540 degrees of rotation. He does two flips, just because spins the opposite way he sets doesn't subtract a complete 180 degrees of rotation from the trick.
That being said, this trick is fucking sick and dean killed it so hard at wcs. I'm not entirely sure what to call this trick, but double flip 540 doesn't make any sense, at all.
eheathBut he rotated at least 720 degrees, he did two flips.
In b4 everyone tells me I'm wrong. It's fucking science, a rodeo 5 is a flip and a 180, 360 degree flip plus 180 spin = 540 degrees of rotation. He does two flips, just because spins the opposite way he sets doesn't subtract a complete 180 degrees of rotation from the trick.
That being said, this trick is fucking sick and dean killed it so hard at wcs. I'm not entirely sure what to call this trick, but double flip 540 doesn't make any sense, at all.
eheathBut he rotated at least 720 degrees, he did two flips.
In b4 everyone tells me I'm wrong. It's fucking science, a rodeo 5 is a flip and a 180, 360 degree flip plus 180 spin = 540 degrees of rotation. He does two flips, just because spins the opposite way he sets doesn't subtract a complete 180 degrees of rotation from the trick.
That being said, this trick is fucking sick and dean killed it so hard at wcs. I'm not entirely sure what to call this trick, but double flip 540 doesn't make any sense, at all.
Chubz.
I want to call this a dub 540 but its too fucked to call it anything..seriously WTF..
He just stops spinning lol
Juho@KilkkiTake a look at all three videos posted in this thread with this in your mind: they're all rightside underflips with reverse grabs. You will be amazed.
eheathHe does two flips and just spins the other way instead of following the natural rotation, bmos did some dubs like this a few years ago at WCS.
eheathBut he rotated at least 720 degrees, he did two flips.
In b4 everyone tells me I'm wrong. It's fucking science, a rodeo 5 is a flip and a 180, 360 degree flip plus 180 spin = 540 degrees of rotation. He does two flips, just because spins the opposite way he sets doesn't subtract a complete 180 degrees of rotation from the trick.
That being said, this trick is fucking sick and dean killed it so hard at wcs. I'm not entirely sure what to call this trick, but double flip 540 doesn't make any sense, at all.
adamwolynWell you aren't counting right tho. You have to consider that you inclined on the take off and declined on the landing... So technically a backflip isn't a 360 degree rotation but a 270-330 degree rotation.
This is what makes a flat 1 possible. If you pause a video of a flat 3 halfway, the person will be at about a 90 degree angle (skis pointing perpendicular away fromflat ground). However, that doesn't mean that the person needs to rotate 90 in a frontflip direction to land flat on their skis. The landing is at an angle so they are about 45-60 degrees from the landing.
The way a flat 1 is done is that you throw a really tweaked flat 3 but slower so that when you are about halfway through the flat 3 rotation, you kinda just drop your skis down 45 degrees or so to be flat with the landing. So it's like 180 degrees of a flat 3 rotation with an added 45 degrees of a switch-front-flip-like rotation to set your body upright on the landing.
So technically it's more of a 225-240 degree rotation but fuck you if that's what you are going to call it cause that's too specific and convoluted to be practical. Since you land switch and it involves straining and tweaking your body so you stop rotating to a 3 and rotate slightly fowards to land, we can call it a 180.
The flat 1 isn't a flatspin(360) + left/right rotation(180)=540.
It's more like .5 flatspin(180) + switch front flip(45-60)= between 225 and 240 degrees of rotation. And that rounds down to 180.
So if you do the very technical math you get flat 1 and in this case dub flat 5.
eheathYou're talking about a true flat spin, dean is doing inverts in his trick.
Also the rest of this you over thought way too much my dude. You can't do two flips and spin less than 720, its physically impossible.
adamwolynYea but in general like Harlauts. It's not an entire flip, it's half a flip
Juho@KilkkiTake a look at all three videos posted in this thread with this in your mind: they're all rightside underflips with reverse grabs. You will be amazed.
SigTveitLike 50% of people I've seen trying to learn double flat 900s has ended up doing this rotation the first time. I don't think I've ever seen anyone do it intentionally. Don't know why, it's a cool trick
eheathBut he rotated at least 720 degrees, he did two flips.
In b4 everyone tells me I'm wrong. It's fucking science, a rodeo 5 is a flip and a 180, 360 degree flip plus 180 spin = 540 degrees of rotation. He does two flips, just because spins the opposite way he sets doesn't subtract a complete 180 degrees of rotation from the trick.
That being said, this trick is fucking sick and dean killed it so hard at wcs. I'm not entirely sure what to call this trick, but double flip 540 doesn't make any sense, at all.
Chubz.
I want to call this a dub 540 but its too fucked to call it anything..seriously WTF..
He just stops spinning lol
eheathHe does two flips and just spins the other way instead of following the natural rotation, bmos did some dubs like this a few years ago at WCS.
RudyGarmischJust because I love proving NS wrong, 1:20:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHLwoZZnPnA
Chubz.so...its a dub flat 7 revert 180 which would be a dub 5?
VinnieFthis is such dumb logic. you cannot call a 7 revert 1 a 5. it's not a 5, it's a 7 revert 1.
do you call this trick a straight air?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCKNid-ZkIk
Chubz.so...its a dub flat 7 revert 180 which would be a dub 5?
VinnieFthis is such dumb logic. you cannot call a 7 revert 1 a 5. it's not a 5, it's a 7 revert 1.
do you call this trick a straight air?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCKNid-ZkIk
eheathYou don't call a 2 pretz 2 a 0 on the rail...
You just subtract degrees because its a revert/change in axis.
Chubz.no...i was asking evan a question about his post. I think its a dub flat 5.
but he never gets to 7, look at that gif, it goes flat 3 to flat/rodeo 1. His body or skis never goes all the way to a 720 once he hits 540 he swings his feet under him to land, I cant call this a 9.
I dunno call it what you want but this is probably the closest thing we've got to a dub 540 right now.
eheathhe does two flips, its at least a 720.
Chubz.lol ok isnt this why we're having this discussion?
he never gets to 720...idk what world you live in where 2 flips = 720 degrees. Especially in this scenario.
Like i see what you'd be saying if the trick was like this..
but its not. I dont get how you think its a 9 when he only does one "three" in the rotation.