Peach.I have. I'm a big fan, actually.
The pair I tried weren't mine to keep. If they were I feel confident that I could've solved some of the fit issues I was having and been reasonably happy in it for 90% of the skiing I do.
Edit caveat:
I haven't skied it in alpine bindings. Only Radicat FT's. I'm reluctant to believe it would have the same suspension and power transfer as my RX 130's in a pair of pivots only because of its reduced mass. But, I haven't had the chance to test it. So I have no evidence to back up that assumption.
I know Cy has spent some time in it for Blister. I'd be interested to hear his thoughts on wether or not we've reached the one-boot-quiver era yet.
**This post was edited on Jan 10th 2018 at 3:01:10pm
**This post was edited on Jan 10th 2018 at 3:02:41pm
I’m going to bump this thread again so that I can eat my words.
I bit the bullet and bought my own pair of Hawx XTD 130’s this year. After playing with the fit and a 6 pack of beer in the back shop I can honestly say they’ve replaced both my Dynafit Beast Carbons for ‘freeride touring’ and my Lange RX 130’s for inbounds skiing.
I talked a lot of shit about light boots and their supposed ‘no compromise’ marketing claims but I think Matt and Atomic have actually done it this time. The XTD 130 walks noticeably better and weighs less than any other competitor I’ve used. It skis better than the S/Lab and right on par with the Freetour (and again. Weighs something like 400 grams less per foot. That is not an insignificant amount of weight.)
I genuinely think it skis just as well as my Lange RX 130’s with the added benefit of 15 degrees of forward lean without a big-ass spoiler. The only thing I miss about my Lange’s is the cush liner. And I only think about that when I’m putting them on in the morning.
Anyways, I guess I hereby admit defeat on the whole ‘one boot quivers are bullshit’ debate we all had a few months ago.
You crushed it on this one, Matt.