First of all, Its retarded to argue with the judging, becuase its done and no discussion can change that. I think the statement that Lanks made saying:
'i think spong didnt deserve what he got'
is just outrageous. Its the judges decision to choose who gets placed where in the standings, they are the only people with the power to decided who is techincally deserving of the spot. Im sure people could argue for hours about who should have beat who and so on, but none of that matters. When you talk about him going pro, to my knowledge, hes not even close to pro, he came into the open with a semi goggle sponsor, riding some armadas and wearing snowboard apparel. I think its amazing how he came into the open, and got to where he did. When Lanks said:
'its the us open trying too hard to produce another 'unknown''
im fairly confident, 'the us open' doesnt get togeather with other comps and decide that there randomly going to make some young kid a star. From what Dave said, it seemed that he deserved his spot in the big air. And was it just 'the us open' that also that gave him a top 10 spot in slopestyle. From what i know, this kid came into the open, threw down, judges loved it, so he got scored how he did. If he didnt deserve what he got, im sure he wouldnt be in that position right now.
But in conclusion, what made me write this was the fact that a 14 year old kid, with no sponors, no media attention, practially unknown, came out and placed top 10 in slope, and 2nd in big air, in one of the biggest skiing events of the year, and you say hes not deserving.....
-Nick Iwanyshyn
_______________________________________________
Saftey Meeting comming 2005 from
Theory-3 Media